Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fact And Comment.... Japan's Latest Blunder
Forbes ^ | October 14, 2002 | Steve Forbes

Posted on 10/01/2002 5:57:30 AM PDT by bert

Fact and Comment
Steve Forbes, 10.14.02, 12:00 AM ET

Japan's Latest Blunder

Talk about desperate but dumb moves. The Bank of Japan has caused a stir with its plan to buy equities from large, troubled banks. No other major central bank owns stocks. In the U.S. it is flat out illegal for the Federal Reserve to do so. The BOJ is going to buy the equities to shore up the capital of shaky banks burdened with enormous numbers of bad loans. This amazing, controversial move wouldn't be happening had the bank had its act together. And the deed will only be a short-term palliative: Japan's troubled economy is still in the woods, which is bad news for all of us.



The BOJ is under tremendous pressure to bail out these banks. Politicians had been hinting that the bank's independence would be jeopardized if drastic steps to prevent a financial collapse were not taken. The BOJ caved. The nice thing for Japanese pols about the bank's writing the checks--the costs don't show up in the budget.

Weep not for this institution. The BOJ is reaping the whirlwind of what it sowed a dozen years ago, when it embarked on its aggressive deflationary policy. Central bankers starved the economy of necessary liquidity by increasing the intrinsic value of the yen, inflicting a crushing burden on debtors. In effect, if you borrowed a yen you'd have to pay back 1.5 to 2 yen. Imagine what would happen in this country if corporate debt went up 50% by Federal Reserve fiat. Japan's situation is even worse because its primitive capital markets make businesses far more dependent on bank debt than they are in any other advanced country.

What should Japan do now? Aggressively reflate by pumping out more yen. With a genuine reflation, corporate balance sheets would enjoy enormous relief. Some of those bad or near-bad bank loans would come back to life, thereby enabling banks to clean up their portfolios without destroying the economy.

A crude but effective barometer of inflation/deflation is the gold price of a currency. Between the late 1980s and 2000 the yen appreciated more than 50% against the yellow metal. This is a deflation of Depression-like magnitude. Since then the BOJ has eased sporadically, but not nearly enough. In fact, there are disturbing signs it may be tightening again.

Why has the BOJ been so bloody-minded when the devastation it wascausing became clear years ago? Some observers speculate the bank has had its own agenda: A harsh money policy would force fundamental restructuring of Japanese companies and banks and perhaps even push politicians to begin reforming their deeply corrupt political system. If so, the strategy patently did not work.

A sick Japan is not good for the U.S., not with China on the rise. Other Asian states would feel more secure and be more prosperous if both the U.S. and Japan's economies were vibrant. The Fed should ponder hard how to avoid a Japanese-style deflation here. After all, we're just beginning to recover from the fallout of the much-milder Greenspan deflation of 1997-2001.

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bankofjapan; japan
Steve Forbes is a great writer and his biweekly column is great reading.
1 posted on 10/01/2002 5:57:30 AM PDT by bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

VOTE THE RATS OUT!!

DONATE TODAY.
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

2 posted on 10/01/2002 6:08:09 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert
He also, I am sure, wines and dines in mid-town Manhattan with the most elite of the elite in Japan, corporate titans who oversee massive kingdoms built in structural corruption, kickbacks, illegal accounting practices, bid rigging, revolving door conflict of interest, and even yakuza control in some bedrock industrial sectors such as real estate, entertainment, construction, transportation, shipbuilding.

Amazing that Mr. Forbes only lightly brought up a brief mention of the single most attributable cause of Japan's problem: endemic corruption by his corporate friends' firms across the board.

He choses to attack the problem from the standpoint of primarily macroeconomic theory discussion within the confines of a hermetically sealed lab.

He misses the point completely. He is not the first 'knowledgeable' American at a senior level to be bullshitted by Japan, Inc. and he won't be the last. Many so-called Japan Revisionists [actually, more "Japan Realists"] wrote for years that "Japan is Different", (Nihon Ishitsu Ron) precisely because this was the statement in an internal Japanese sense of Japanese corporate culture. The strategy in dealing with Japan would be to deal with Japan as Japan is, not what our subjective American view of them would be. When the West and particularly US trade negotiators caught on and said they, too, believe in a unique corruption aspect of Japan, the PR mechanism of Japan in the USA run by Japan's Embassy, JETRO, K Street lobbyists, Japan-funded think tanks and academicians like Heritage or Cato, and compliant American apologists, was to strongly refute that Japan was anything of the sort. That if anything, it was "just like America".

They sought to disavow any aspects of endemic cultural business corruption. They hoodwinked a lot of people along the way. Forbes Magazine never attacked the problem from this perspective, and yet eerily, the Japanese version of Forbes (Forbes Japan) had a number of articles written by Japanese, among Japanese, in Japanese, that called the problem square on....needless to say, these never saw the light of day translated into Steve's US-side publication. Why was that?

3 posted on 10/01/2002 6:15:07 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Heritage and CATO are funded by Japanese ?
4 posted on 10/01/2002 6:22:42 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Yes, they receive yen. Read Pat Choate's "Agents of Influence" and research the money trail by Japan on influencing US perception of Japan in the US.
5 posted on 10/01/2002 6:30:30 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
I also highly recomment both "Bamboozled: How Americans Have Been Managed by Japan in their Japan Policy" (by Professor Ivan Hall), which came out recently, which follows another brilliant book of his, "Cartels of the Mind". You will see how much the debate is controlled and dissent is not permitted when Japan controls the PR agenda. Another good one, yet old, is "The Enigma of Japanese Power" by Karel von Wolferen.
6 posted on 10/01/2002 6:33:41 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
In addition, from Korea, too:

This foundation was very close to both the Chun and Roh regimes, and received large amounts of funding from Korea. Chang Se-dong, a director of the KCIA (after it was renamed the Agency for National Security Planning), testified in 1988 that the Agency donated substantial sums to Heritage, but would not confirm the actual amount. Other documents from a 1988 inquiry, however, gave the sum as $2.2 million. One account noted that Heritage failed to report this to the Justice Department's foreign agents department.[42]

From Japan Policy Research Institute

7 posted on 10/01/2002 6:41:38 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

8 posted on 10/01/2002 6:44:20 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bert
I guess Japan wants to be like Argentina. They are going to go bankrupt, you can see it coming.
9 posted on 10/01/2002 6:49:05 AM PDT by Nuke'm Glowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert
BOJ ownership of some of the stock of some Japanese companies will allow the Bank's directors and senior managers and their friends to eventually become directors of those companies. With each corporate diectorship will come some degree of wealth.
10 posted on 10/01/2002 6:50:40 AM PDT by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Forbes has a long history of being hoodwinked by foreign corruption. I remember the glowing reports they wrote about the previous president of Mexico, a man so sleazy he had to live in exile once his term ended. In fact, I believe he was even a guest columnist for a while.
11 posted on 10/01/2002 7:07:48 AM PDT by jalisco555
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jalisco555
It fits a pattern. It is a management of reality at the senior levels of US business and US journalism, often in tandem, to gloss over some of the more 'offensive' practices and natures of their international partners. And yet, as I pointed out, domestic journalism in these countries, credible economic reporters, quite frankly write in detail what the true problems are. But these observations are buffed over and filtered out by the slick PR machines many of these foreign countries and companies employ through lobbying, legal, foundation, think tank and consular mechanisms in the USA. The Soviets did it (or tried). The Japanese do it. The Mexicans do it. It's big money and it is often quite effective.
12 posted on 10/01/2002 7:55:52 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Phew! It's hard to believe your point because your post is more condescension and innuendo than content.

Is Japan "unique" from top to bottom? Aren't all countries? But that doesn't allow it to escape the rigors of economic analysis. Fundamentals are fundamentals. As the article's title suggests, this BoJ move is only the latest in a long string of increasingly desperate moves. I wouldn't be surprised if Japan Inc declares bankruptcy (increasingly likely) if they don't get their act together. And it may very well require something that radical to force reform in Japan. While SF doesn't need me as an apologist (I wish ;-), he clearly references Japan's' structural corruptness. To the extent such "uniqueness" is cultural, only external necessity (e.g., macroeconomics) can force a painful change. Culture is destiny.

Your laundry list of Japanese problems existed before and during the upturn in Japan Inc's value. Their existence during the downturn can hardly be causative. (Just as the existence in the US of a long list of structural problems is hardly causative of the current US downturn). Similarly, if systemic corruption did not exist in Japan during the 70's and 80's, Japan's fall in the 90's would still have needed to occur (just as the current US downturn was necessary after the Clinton Bubble).

Quite frankly, I think Japan will just hobble along until either another bubble comes along, or their house of cards collapses.

As a personal aside, I think much of the US political kowtowing was brought on by politicos' assumptions that Japan had found a third-way (one that favored their own corrupt practices).
13 posted on 10/01/2002 8:58:06 AM PDT by polemikos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: polemikos
What you are saying, then, is that you are a fan of rational choice economic theory? Correct?
14 posted on 10/01/2002 9:08:29 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: polemikos
he clearly references Japan's' structural corruptness

Oh, he referenced it alright, but he does not give it the key coverage that it deserves, that his US version of his magazine ignores, and that is commonplace discussion in Japan in context of what the Japanese think about their own system, and which many foreigners simply cannot grasp for what it is.

15 posted on 10/01/2002 9:11:04 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
I can't argue because I am not an economist. I don't think Steve Forbes wines and dines Japanese politicos and has any thing to lose by taking them to task. He has enough problem in America.

If he raises the issue, pay attention.

I intend to post some of his work for more people to see. Your criticism to the contrary, he is not only a great Amewrican, he is a great writer. The left fears him.

16 posted on 10/01/2002 11:06:16 AM PDT by bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bert
PS: memo to file...... stop dictating your posts to Free Republic.
17 posted on 10/01/2002 11:08:09 AM PDT by bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bert
Sorry, but more me, the issue of dissecting and understanding les realities of Japan, far transcends mere, worn-out, 'left vs. right'.

Even Rush Limbaugh is great on Clinton, Toricelli, and Iraq issues but he is an absolute idiot when it comes to Japan, how to understand them, and how to deal with Japan officialdom for the benefit of the United States national interest.

18 posted on 10/01/2002 11:21:55 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
You are trying to deflect the discussion back to your desire to discredit Forbes by making him a right winger. he is much more.

Chew on this for me:

"Japan is saddled with a pernicious combination of dangerously high government debt and low interest rates.

In the 1990s the Japanese attempted to resuscitate their moribund economy with more than $1 trillion in government spending, but it was futile, as the money got sucked into a vast financial sinkhole. The Bank of Japan (BOJ) has lowered short-term interest rates all the way to 0%, but deflationary pressures persist and the economy isn't growing. Japanese consumers are frightened and don't want to spend, so the low nominal rates have had a negligible impact on the economy.

In the eight months since Prime Minister Koizumi took office, the Japanese economy has fallen deeper into recession. Koizumi's fiscal restraint has left the responsibility of boosting domestic growth squarely on the shoulders of the BOJ, but its efforts continue to be ineffectual, leaving the economy in a very precarious position."

The Sinking Yen

Andrew J. Kreiger, 02.04.02

Forbes

19 posted on 10/01/2002 11:38:17 AM PDT by bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bert
All of this is true, of course, there is no reason to argue it. The overarching underpinnings and foundation of this, every bit of it, is bound up in massive, endemic structural corruption in Japan, the boryokudan (organized crime) stranglehold on the real estate and construction sectors, the press on banks to loan even though no bank in it's right mind in an Occidental setting would loan to some of these companies, and reprehensible lack of transparency in most major Japanese corporations, and on the part of nearly all ruling LDP politicians as well as the so-called watchdog "regulatory" organizations in Japan such as Kosei Torihiki Iinkai.

He does not go to the root of the problem (which Japanese commentators have more than adequately done).

20 posted on 10/01/2002 1:26:02 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson