Skip to comments.
Forrester:"NJ has no 'we think we're going to lose so we get to pick someone new' clause"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A24368-2002Sep30.html ^
| 9/30/02
| Doug Forrester
Posted on 09/30/2002 5:59:16 PM PDT by ChadGore
"The laws of the state of New Jersey do not contain a 'we think we're going to lose so we get to pick someone new' clause," taunted Torricelli's challenger, Doug Forrester.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: majority; njgop; thenextsenator
1
posted on
09/30/2002 5:59:16 PM PDT
by
ChadGore
To: ChadGore
"The laws of the state of New Jersey do not contain a 'we think we're going to lose so we get to pick someone new' clause," taunted Torricelli's challenger, Doug Forrester.
2
posted on
09/30/2002 5:59:54 PM PDT
by
ChadGore
bttt
3
posted on
09/30/2002 6:00:37 PM PDT
by
ChadGore
To: ChadGore
I heard that live on Hannity, totally unrehearsed off the cuff comment.
To: ChadGore
Communists recognize no rules or laws unless such instruments preserve their power.
To: Constitutional Patriot
Re:
Communists recognize no rules or laws unless such instruments preserve their power. Damn, that's good, did you just make that up ?
6
posted on
09/30/2002 6:03:57 PM PDT
by
ChadGore
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
Props for Forrester who sounds like he just might be spurred on to become a search and destroy Republican.
7
posted on
09/30/2002 6:05:15 PM PDT
by
dennisw
To: dennisw
bttt
8
posted on
09/30/2002 6:09:25 PM PDT
by
ChadGore
To: ChadGore
Already nominated as non-Freeper Quote of the Day
To: ChadGore
This is the political equivalent of "calling a do over"
If this fictional replacement for Torricelli doesn't excite the voters either, will the Democrats go the bullpen yet again?
To: The G Man
If the dems had a god damn brain in there head, they would just back the green party guy (who ever the hell that is) and push them with ads and such. Thank God that the dems are devious power hungry idiots. They'll probably try and go to court to do something, and lose there. My personal belief is that they wanted him to drop out for 3 reasons. 1)He's going to lose, maybe they can replace him or try and usurp the law in an attempt to do so, 2)He is costing them alot of money in a pathetic attempt to keep office, as long as he runs, they were going to give money which they can use elsewhere, 3)He is bad press, every time news reports talk about senate races, he is the first name mentioned and the first story which sets a nasty following for all the other rat canidates.
11
posted on
09/30/2002 6:25:41 PM PDT
by
Sonny M
To: The G Man
Mulligan... NOT!
Trajan88; TAMU Class of '88; Texas aTm Aggies... Beat the Hell outta the TT Redwing Raiderettes!
12
posted on
09/30/2002 6:26:58 PM PDT
by
Trajan88
To: The G Man
This is the political equivalent of "calling a do over" Multiple Mulligans went out with Slick Willie two years ago. Now days we adhere to the rules.
13
posted on
09/30/2002 6:28:50 PM PDT
by
jackbill
EVERYONE NEEDS A HELPING HAND! SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC TODAY! VOTE REPUBLICAN!
VOTE THE RATS OUT!!
DONATE TONIGHT
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC
Donate here by secure server
Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
14
posted on
09/30/2002 6:45:46 PM PDT
by
terilyn
To: dennisw
Forrester was just on "Hannity and Commie". His interview was more interesting than the Torch's "it's all you peoples' fault, not mine" opus. Reruns at 2:00AM ET.
To: ChadGore
Other possible replacements, Reps. Menendez, Rob Andrews and Frank Pallone, are members of the House, and relatively little known outside their own districts. And these replacements would create a "snowball" problem as they, in turn, would need to be replaced by someone else on the ballot. The Republicans tried this bait-and-switch nonsense against Schundler. It must be stopped before it gets even more out of hand.
To: Hillarys Gate Cult
I just saw it on EST time.
17
posted on
09/30/2002 6:54:39 PM PDT
by
dennisw
To: dennisw
When's algore and reno gonna demand a recount?
To: ChadGore
Once again the Dems are trying to cheat the voters. But after you try to steal the US Presidency, what's the big deal about trying to steal a Senate seat?
19
posted on
09/30/2002 7:24:59 PM PDT
by
TheDon
To: ChadGore
Yes. It's only the truth.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson