She called him "you" emphasizing the word as in-- it was "YOU" who did this, it was "YOU" who did that.
It was insulting. He was polite although taken back by the rude booing of her crowd.
Why the hell did this guy agree to a debate sponsored by the NAACP? That's like a Demo'rat agreeing to a debate sponsored by Free Republic in hall filled with angry Freepers.
Were I Protestant, I'd take offense at her attempt to mimic a revival preacher. Near the end she was a'bellowing about her faith in MD. "Ah Buh-leeeeeve in the people of Maryland hubbubllulula.... Ah Buh-leeeve that the economy will turn around hubbbubblullla.... Ah Buh-leeeve!!" Fortunately, she has no rhythm so she stumbled and looked like the idiot she really is. But she did try!
To Ehrlich's credit, he did point out that there exists a diversity of ideas in this state, that he rejects the idea that all people of a certain pigmentation must have the same ideology, and that thinking people should be offended that the Democrats take them for granted.