[sam_paine]

AAAAAAARRRRRRGGGGGHHHHH

Teddy: "If Tony Blair is correct, and Saddam can launch WMD in less than 45 minutes, then that's even more reason not to put OUR troops into harm's way, unless all possible diplomatic means have been exhausted."

IOW, if he's got WMD, then it's already too dangerous to attack him, and if he doesn't have WMD then there's no reason to attack him!!!

I'm, uh, speechless!!!

[Molly Pitcher]

For your edification and enjoyment:-)

[epluribus_2]

If he has'em, and we know it - WE DON'T NEED NO STEENKING EENSPECTIONS, TED!!! If Tony's right, then Saddam is lying, RIGHT? Then the whole premise of Inspecting to Verify that Iraq No Longer Has... is moot and a bunch of crap. And do you think those nerdy swiss nuclear accountants will be any use in forcing Disarmament? Get a life! Get a brain!

Sad thing is 43% of the voters have neither.

[Capt_Hank]

I was also confused by his statement. I still say the "Gulf War Syndrome", was caused by Saddam's chemical arsonal.

[Violette]

If Tony Blair is correct, and Saddam can launch WMD in less than 45 minutes, then that's even more reason not to put OUR troops into harm's way, unless all possible diplomatic means have been exhausted.

It sounds like Teddy is suggesting that we negotiate with the terrorists in this statement. Because that is the logic when one negotiates with terrorists; talk to them and find a middle ground so no one gets hurt....when all we do in the end is compromise and compromise and then 9/11 happens.