Replies

It's funny. I never really gave the definition much thought, but my idea of a neo-con is almost a direct opposite of yours. My own take on it is that it's not so much a difference in the desired end result, but in the means of getting it. I consider Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Ann Coulter hard-core neo-cons. By my definition, neo-cons believe the "end justifies the means" when promoting their agenda. Take no prisoners, kill all the liberals/arabs/communists. Just generally bitchy and divisive, with absolutely no room for compromise (or independant thought). I have no use for any of them.

Just generally bitchy and divisive, with absolutely no room for compromise (or independant thought).

This may shock you, but I can't identify with any of the above. Cheers.

By my definition, neo-cons believe the "end justifies the means" when promoting their agenda. Take no prisoners, kill all the liberals/arabs/communists.

WRONG this is what the sensible members of the hard right( like Rush and Rush is hard right he ain't no Bush Bot) believe( as well as the objectivist libertarians among other groups of libertarians pacifism and pie in the sky isolationism tend to cloud their reason). If Neocons believed this I would give them more credit. The left is evil its agenda is totalitarianism and they should be ruthlessly exterminated before they do it to us. Well I wouldn't say all Arabs I would say all who wouldn't convert. As for liberals most are just sheep only their leaders need to be executed.

Do unto others before they can do unto you.