Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stun gun used on boy -- Stepfather: Device suitable disciplinary tool
Houston Chronicle ^ | September 26, 2002 | Eric Hanson

Posted on 09/26/2002 7:17:06 AM PDT by Dog Gone

SWEENY -- After his 8-year-old stepson missed his school bus earlier this week, Theodore E. Moody told the boy to walk.

stun gun
Kevin Fujii / Chronicle
The Panther, a stun gun wielding 300,000 volts, was used by a man to punish his 8-year-old stepson for missing his school bus.
And to make sure he didn't dawdle, he followed the child, shocking him repeatedly with a stun gun.

Child welfare officials removed the boy and three other children from Moody's home near this Brazoria County town after learning that he had been disciplining the boy with the battery-powered device.

"I just can't fathom people doing something like this to their own children," sheriff's Capt. Jeff Adkins said Wednesday.

District Attorney Jeri Yenne, who tested the device on herself to understand what the boy felt, said she is awaiting the outcome of an investigation before deciding whether to file charges.

"This is a new one for us," said Estella Olguin, spokeswoman for Children's Protective Services.

Officials at Wild Peach Elementary, in the Columbia-Brazoria school district, contacted authorities Monday after the boy arrived. Adkins said the boy told police his stepfather used the stun gun to punish him for being late to school.

Moody, 27, who recently quit his job as a truck driver, acknowledged Wednesday that he had resorted to the stun gun when other disciplinary methods failed.

"I felt I did the right thing," he said. "The belt didn't work; this did. It hurts less than the belt.

"I've whipped his ass so hard that it left marks. That just didn't send the message and this did."

Moody and his wife have two children, ages 2 and 3, in addition to the boy and his 11-year-old sister, who are her children from a previous marriage. All four are now in a foster home, Olguin said.

Although parents have the right to use corporal punishment, she said, the methods must be within reason.

"They felt (the stun gun) was an appropriate form of discipline," she said. "This just seems like a very cruel way to punish a child."

Moody, who moved here several years ago from New York, said he had told his stepson that if he missed his school bus again he would have to walk to school, although it is several miles.

"So we went for a walk and every time he slowed down, I hit him in the ass with (the stun gun)."

He said he had acquired the Panther 100 recently in exchange for a pack of cigarettes. He tested it on himself, his wife and a neighbor before using it on the boy, Moody said.

Moody said his wife drove him and the boy the rest of the way to school after they had walked about a mile and the boy grew tired.

Adkins, the sheriff's captain, said the mother told officers that she does not consider stun-gun jolts a harsh punishment.

Adkins said he has been shocked by a stun gun and likened it to a severe bee sting, followed by temporary paralysis. He said the device usually causes two small, red blisters similar to insect bites.

Yenne, the district attorney, said she wanted to know how much pain a stun gun inflicts.

"I used it on myself because I honestly thought that I needed to know if it caused physical pain and I needed to know what the 8-year-old felt like," she said.

She touched her leg with the device and said it was an unforgettable experience.

"It hurt. It was very uncomfortable," she said. "I don't think I will do it again."

From a prosecutorial standpoint, Yenne said, there are differences between parents who deliberately abuse their children and those who use poor judgment when administering punishment.

"I believe sometimes that well-intentioned people make horrible decisions on discipline," she said.

She added that the expectation of pain was almost worse than the pain itself.

"The apprehension prior to it was probably more excruciating," she said. "It is psychological abuse. This goes to show that some people believe that if you don't leave marks there is no injury. I really believe that was the thought process."

Depending on what the investigation turns up, Yenne said, Moody could be indicted on a third-degree felony of injury to a child.

A court hearing will be held Tuesday to determine whether the children should remain in CPS custody.

Moody said he still believes it was appropriate to use the stun gun, but said he will not use it since police and child welfare officials believe otherwise.

"It's not abuse," he said. "The instructions say that it cannot cause permanent damage. My definition of abuse is some kind of permanent damage, whether it be physical or mental."

The Panther is manufactured by Panther Stun Guns.com, a division of PersonalArms.com of Little Ferry, N.J. Company vice president Nick Cicala said the devices are intended for self-defense but, unfortunately, also are used to attack others.

He said he had never heard of one being used to discipline a child.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

1 posted on 09/26/2002 7:17:06 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
As much as I think the use of stun-guns on a child is absoFReepinglutely horrible, the police use them on people they would like to control. So, think about that. Frog in a pot.
2 posted on 09/26/2002 7:21:19 AM PDT by Scruffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !

Would he use a stun gun on his dog?

I have an idea of how to make his agree to confess .... but it would involve turning the perp's gonads into 'crispy critters."

3 posted on 09/26/2002 7:21:39 AM PDT by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
We need to require a license to have children with a continuous 3 year renewal. This would be for all
4 posted on 09/26/2002 7:23:46 AM PDT by .45MAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scruffy
I don't think the two are really comparable - there's a bit of a physiological difference between an 8-year old, ~50 pound boy, and a ~200 pound drunken lout of an adult.
5 posted on 09/26/2002 7:24:01 AM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
"I've whipped his ass so hard that it left marks. That just didn't send the message and this did."

Nice guy.
6 posted on 09/26/2002 7:28:18 AM PDT by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scruffy
LOL, are you saying that slap-sticks and mace would be appropriate family discipline tools?

Of course, "cutting your own switch" in days gone by probably isn't too much better than a stun-gun.

By the way, as dangerously foolish (read: male) teenagers, my friends and I would use a stun-gun to shock each other. We'd never be able to keep it in place for more than a fraction of a second since the target was always aware that it was coming, so there were never any serious effects. I even used an old one with a weak battery to keep me awake on a Spring Break trip to Florida when my radio was broken.

7 posted on 09/26/2002 7:32:27 AM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Scruffy
Frog in a pot.

This is no frog in the pot scenario.

Using a stun gun on an 8 year old is a criminal offense, besides being incredible moronic thing to do

A stun gun in the hands of a police officer using it for control verses a weapon in the hands of a officer makes for a few less dead dump ass "hold muh beer drunks" or dopers and a few less cops putting a slug into a normally harmless idiot who had too much to drink or taken too many drugs to know better.

8 posted on 09/26/2002 7:32:41 AM PDT by JZoback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JZoback
"Using a stun gun on an 8 year old is a criminal offense, besides being incredible moronic thing to do"

Why is that? I thought stun guns were harmless, had no side effects, and did no damage?

My point is that we have become a society where as long as something happens to the other guy, we're OK with that: He probably deserved it. Put the word "child" in the same argument, and we freak out. A human is a human, so why the difference?

No child deserves abuse, mental or physical. So, why do we accept abuse to adults? I know, I know, a 200 pound crazy man should immediately be stunned. yeah, right. No other way around that situation, huh?

If someone is really posing a lethal threat and needs restrained, shoot the idiot. This "less than lethal force" stuff simply has given the cops the idea that use of force is OK as long as the person doesn't die, which has also elevated the use of deadly force to the point we are even killing the same children we freak out about.

Frog in a pot.
9 posted on 09/26/2002 7:46:17 AM PDT by Scruffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
He tested it on himself, his wife and a neighbor before using it on the boy, Moody said.

"Hey baby...hold muh beer and watch this!"
10 posted on 09/26/2002 7:53:20 AM PDT by Sweet_Sunflower29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
Of course, "cutting your own switch" in days gone by probably isn't too much better than a stun-gun.

I don't know. My grandparents were the most gentle people, yet they lovingly recalled some stories about having to go get a peach switch or two. Didn't seem to hurt them or mar their characters. Who knows, maybe it even helped?

"No discipline seems pleasant at the time, but painful. Later on, however, it produces a harvest of righteousness and peace for those who have been trained by it."—Hebrews 12:11

11 posted on 09/26/2002 7:53:43 AM PDT by avenir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Scruffy
Ditto sonic and microwave pain fields, beanbags, barf gas, sticky foam, water cannons, pepper spray ... stuff to make the rabble go home and stop complaining. Officers would never use any of these methods indiscriminately - or for the purpose of oppression of legitimate political dissent.
12 posted on 09/26/2002 7:56:13 AM PDT by coloradan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: .45MAN
Why was an 8 year old being sent to catch the bus at a bus stop without an adult? When my kids were that young, I waited at the bus stop with them.
13 posted on 09/26/2002 7:57:52 AM PDT by mouse_35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator; southern rock
"I've whipped his ass so hard that it left marks. That just didn't send the message and this did."

Here's your kinda guy. Jump in and defend him.

14 posted on 09/26/2002 8:00:13 AM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Now we can hear from all the Freepers who were stun-gunned as children and turned out "just fine".
15 posted on 09/26/2002 8:01:58 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Would he use a stun gun on his dog?

Ever hear of the invisible fence?

16 posted on 09/26/2002 8:04:10 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Scruffy
Suitable disciplinary tools are a belt, or a ping pong paddle. Cattle prods ain't. Sheesh.
17 posted on 09/26/2002 8:05:29 AM PDT by Liberal Classic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
An eight year old is still learning how to do things on his own and still requires a lot of help and reminding. A man who would resort to beatings and stun guns to motivate a child reveals a real lack of character.
18 posted on 09/26/2002 8:07:26 AM PDT by lsee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
"Moody said his wife drove him and the boy the rest of the way to school after they had walked about a mile and the boy grew tired"

I think the kid must be a pathetic wimp. My eight year old girl can run farther than that and ride a bike over 30 miles. He must be a feminized public school kid. perhaps on ritilan or something.

I think we have all been conditioned to be reviled whenever the word "child" is spoken. We are all conditioned to gasp for air - even before you know the facts. The truth is that you all gasped even before you knew the details.

I think that conditioning is far worse than anything in the story.

The guy is obviously a "hold muh beer" kind of guy. But is the reaction really to say the GOVERNMENT should issue licenses? The GOVERNMENT should regulate and manage the family???? Pluuueeeaase!

19 posted on 09/26/2002 8:08:30 AM PDT by artios
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZoback
This clown is the stepdad. Not unusual in the animal world for the replacement male to kill the existing offspring or drive them off. Whe wants to support anothers young. What is wrong with the mother here? Bunch of inbred moe-rons.
20 posted on 09/26/2002 8:13:54 AM PDT by willyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson