Posted on 09/21/2002 5:47:32 PM PDT by StopGlobalWhining
Corinne Thatcher is a junior majoring in Latin American studies and a Collegian columnist. Her e-mail address is cet131@psu.edu.
It seems as if President Bush has found a new cause to distract television viewers from the heated political commentary that has besieged the issue of Iraq. In a speech Tuesday, Dubya spoke with incredulity about the lack of knowledge U.S. students have about their nation's history. He expressed amazement, for example, at the fact that the average student doesn't know that James Madison was instrumental in drafting the U.S. Constitution -- though I cannot help but wonder whether he knew this fact before his morning briefing.
But you know what? For the first time since President Bush expressed his support for the legalization of undocumented Mexicans working in the U.S. (we'll save commentary on that issue for another day), I actually find myself in agreement with the president of my country. Bush is absolutely right: Americans, in general, know far too little about the history of our country. However, I have a feeling that Bush and I differ on what we mean when we say Americans should know more about this country's past.
Bush has made it quite clear that the version of America's past he is referring to is the version that portrays America as the world's triumphant moral leader, existing as a beacon of hope to the undemocratic, undeveloped nations of the world. His version of our nation's past would glorify the merits of statesmen such as George Washington; it would remind us of how America single-handedly pulled Europe out of the shambles left by World War II; and it would have us all learn how America saved Latin America from the evils of communism during the Cold War by instating leaders committed to democratic principle.
I, on the other hand, would have Americans learn both sides of the story. I would have us learn that George Washington, among others, also owned slaves and purportedly had numerous affairs with his female servants; I would remind us that one of the primary reasons the U.S. passed the Marshall Plan was because our own economy hinged on the well-being of Europe's (hardly altruistic); and I would call into question our government's practice of protecting democracy by overthrowing popularly elected leaders in order to replace them with military dictators.
Believe it or not, I would do all this out of patriotism. I love my country and what it is supposed to stand for, and I am thankful for the rights that Americans enjoy. But Americans are being duped out of those rights by being told that our leaders are helping to uphold the American values of democracy, freedom and human rights around the world, when they are often doing the opposite. The education most of us receive in school and from the media has lulled Americans into complacency: Why exercise our rights to peacefully protest, to question our government, and, in a growing number of cases, even to vote when things seem to be going along just fine?
The truth is, though, that things are not going along just fine. In the eyes of the rest of the world, America is no longer the model nation it once was -- and I can say this with a significant level of confidence. I happened to be among the small number of Americans, including 13 of your other Penn State classmates, who showed up in Johannesburg, South Africa, for history's largest-ever summit, despite the fact that our president decided to take the time to vacation. And friends, the world is not happy with us. "What are we going to do about the United States?" were the bold letters tattooed across the shirt of a workshop facilitator at the parallel Civil Society Summit on Sustainable Development, where reps from non-governmental organizations (NGOs) had come together to hold their own forum on the issues compromising our collective future. In Johannesburg, the outlaw country was not Iraq, North Korea or Libya; it was the U.S., the country that wants to break inveterate just-war doctrine with pre-emptive strikes against Iraq; the country that demands support in its war against terrorism, but refuses to support other countries in eradicating the conditions that breed terrorists.
Is this the view that we want the world to take of our country? Are we as Americans prepared to be the outlaws? I hope the answer is no; and if it is, that means it's time for us to seek out the facts, because if the past is any indication of the future, our government, media and schools aren't going to provide them for us. It is time for us as Americans to rise out of our complacency and to exercise our rights, which have lain dormant for so long: our rights to question, criticize, and communicate to our leaders the policies we want on the national and international agenda.
We as Americans have a lot more power than we think to effect change in this world because we live in a country that controls a very large portion of the world's resources, and we have the right, as citizens of a democracy, to dictate how those resources are used and shared. Let us not forsake our responsibility to the world to ensure that the leaders of our country are playing by the rules.
The good news for Penn State is they had the highest percentage of conservative faculty, 17%, than any other college mentioned in Professor Williams column.
The sorry article above by a naive Penn State junior is a sorry reminder of the results of such a policy.
Ah, Corinne Thatcher, Mr Madison knew you would say that!
TUESDAY. JUNE 26. IN CONVENTION
"Mr Madison: ...In framing a system which we wish to last for ages, we shd. not lose sight of the changes which ages will produce. An increase of population will of necessity increase the proportion of those who will labour under all the hardships of life, & secretly sigh for a more equal distribution of its blessings. These may in time outnumber those who are placed above the feelings of indigence. According to the equal laws of suffrage, the power will slide into the hands of the former. No agrarian attempts have yet been made in in this Country, but symtoms, of a leveling spirit, as we have understood, have sufficiently appeared in a certain quarters to give notice of the future danger. How is this danger to be guarded agst. on republican principles? How is the danger in all cases of interested coalitions to oppress the minority to be guarded agst.? "
What type of career does one hope to fashion based on that degree?
It's too bad the author didn't share at the world conference the following part about what she believes our rights are:
We as Americans have a lot more power than we think to effect change in this world because we live in a country that controls a very large portion of the world's resources, and we have the right, as citizens of a democracy, to dictate how those resources are used and shared.
Thud.
I was one once. In fact, when I was 18, my parents were completely and utterly screwed up. By the time I was 21 and got married myself, it was amazing what they had learned in just three short years.
Ok, I agree with this, but I think the author is lulled to sleep, too. Since she is such a civil rights, diversity advocate, perhaps she should read up on the founder of her university - Penn owned slaves.
You forgot "I mean".
What type of career does one hope to fashion based on that degree?
"You want fries with that?"
What type of career does one hope to fashion based on that degree?
Several possible careers immediately come to mind:
Or perhaps if she wants to prove her leftist commitment to the cause of global justice, she can lead a rescue mission to Peru to liberate fellow naive dunce, Lori Berenson, currently freezing in a jail in the Andes.
These naive, ignorant do-gooders think they can get away in other countries with the same nonsense we tolerate in America.
Piling on her is like kicking kittens for gosh sakes.
In earlier generations children were taught that George Washington chopped down his father's cherry tree. That was also a lie, but at least the story taught an important lesson: don't chop down someone else's tree.
Paul - see my post #10
[Actually I think you were partly right, I'm just testing the limits of your argument :) ]...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.