Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Patrick) Kennedy Chief of Staff Fired Over Lobbying
Providence Journal | 9/19/02 | John Mulligan

Posted on 09/20/2002 11:13:37 AM PDT by aShepard

Kennedy chief of staff fired over lobbying
Political observers say Rep. Patrick J. Kennedy ousted Dean J. Martilli because Martilli's failure to fully disclose his past lobbying activities could become a campaign issue.

09/19/2002

BY JOHN E. MULLIGAN

Journal Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON -- Rep. Patrick J. Kennedy yesterday accepted the resignation of his chief of staff, whose failure to disclose his past dealings as a Washington lobbyist had become a political liability.

Kennedy portrayed his top staffer, Dean J. Martilli, as the victim of unfair criticism by his little-known Republican opponent, David W. Rogers. But he said, "I thought it was wise for Dean to move on," so that his reelection campaign can focus on public policy issues.

Martilli's ouster is the second such Kennedy staff upheaval in 18 months. It comes less than seven weeks before Rhode Island voters decide whether to grant Kennedy a fifth term in the House.

The episode also represents a strange twist in the continuing drama of Kennedy's career.

Rather than press on with his lavishly financed campaign and ignore the attacks, which have received scant attention from the news media, the famous congressman responds in the splashiest way possible.

He sends his chief of staff packing.

"They're nervous," Moakley said of Kennedy and his circle. "Rhode Island voters are very skittish about insider connections and the emerging scandals at the State House," she said. "To the extent that there is any related criticism" that Martilli skirted "the spirit of the law" on congressional ethics, Kennedy has a problem, she said.

Moakley and Darrell M. West, a Brown University political scientist, both said the issue of Martilli's lobbying is not enough to defeat Kennedy but will increase scrutiny of the congressman.

They also stressed that they view public financial disclosure laws as a serious policy matter. "The purpose of these rules is to give voters information on the financial interests of congressional staffers so that people can judge where that person is earning his income and what interests they have," said West, "or conflicts of interest."

When he hired Martilli in April 2001, Kennedy agreed to pay him $97,300 a year in public funds to be his chief of staff -- just below the level that would have triggered the personal financial disclosure statement demanded of members of Congress and their principal aides.

Separately, Kennedy paid Martilli from campaign funds -- $82,930 since his hiring -- for work on his reelection. In an interview yesterday, Kennedy defended the arrangement, saying it complied with the law. "There's nothing wrong with it," said the congressman.

"There is absolutely no reason for a chief of staff making a lot of money not to file a financial disclosure statement," countered West, an expert on the influence of money on the Congress. Such disclosure "is pretty routine in congressional offices across the country," even though Martilli's arrangement was apparently legal, West said.

Martilli also failed, for most of his tenure with Kennedy, to file another public document required under congressional ethics law, a statement of his work and income as a lobbyist prior to joining Kennedy's staff.

In fact, Martilli denied that he had been a lobbyist when Rogers, Kennedy's Republican opponent, raised questions about the issue early last month. He said, rather, that he had been a "consultant."

But on Aug. 28, Martilli quietly filed a back-dated form acknowledging that he had been a lobbyist before joining Kennedy's staff. The form said his clients included Picerne Properties, a national real-estate concern based in Warwick.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Rhode Island
KEYWORDS: kennedy; patches; ratscum
Well, following Patches problems with a LAX security guard; his trashing of a chartered yacht, after the Coast Guard had to evacuate his harrassed female companion; his close ties to the RI House leader who is battling to keep his position after the disclosure that he had the state pay $75,000 in workers comp to an employee to keep her quiet about his sexual harrassment, (read Lewinski's), I think that RI voters may be ready to ditch this Rat embarrassment.

This guy Rogers is a great pubbie choice, businessman, ex Navy Seal, articulate, and savvy. He's getting great press on this issue.

1 posted on 09/20/2002 11:13:37 AM PDT by aShepard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aShepard
Patches seems a bit shakey. Maybe he needs another run-in with LAX senior citizens who dare to get in his way.

What a POS!

The only good Kennedy was killed in Dallas... IMHO.

2 posted on 09/20/2002 11:21:57 AM PDT by johnny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aShepard
Once again, this will be another example of "being a rat means never having to admit your guilt".
3 posted on 09/20/2002 11:24:19 AM PDT by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mware
Patches bump!!!!
4 posted on 09/20/2002 11:34:03 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aShepard
If young Patrick REALLY and SINCERELY felt Martilli was a victim why then didn't he stand up like a man and INSIST Martilli remain on board?????????? Are you kidding??? ha,ha.
5 posted on 09/20/2002 11:49:42 AM PDT by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cubreporter
He is clearly the stupidist Kennedy, if that's possible to distinguish. When will he run for the Senate so he can carry of the tradition.
6 posted on 09/20/2002 11:51:35 AM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aShepard
I hope all the Kennedy's and Cuomo's and the ex-Klintoon staffers all get their political careers/ambitions cut short.
7 posted on 09/20/2002 11:53:40 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aShepard
LOL. Those Kennedy's.
8 posted on 09/20/2002 12:35:00 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
None of 'em ever were or ever will be any good...IMHO.
9 posted on 09/20/2002 2:35:31 PM PDT by metesky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aShepard
Patrick admitted to being on antidepressants didn't he?
We have an emotionally unstable congress twit from Rhode Island. We will soon see just how much Rhode Island voters need a Kennedy name. I am hoping they realize this little guy needs a vacation and some help.
10 posted on 09/20/2002 2:47:03 PM PDT by oldironsides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aShepard
I've always been for a constitutonal amendment that would limit the number of Kennedy progeny in government.....The Keep Out the Kennedys Amendment.

There's so many Kennedys in or seeking office. The Kennedy sense of entitlement for power has become something akin to an imperial privilege.

It's offensive the way they roll over other American citizens who dare to get in their way. Patrick is one of the worst Kennedy offenders, besides the terminally liberal Teddy, that is.

11 posted on 09/20/2002 7:16:50 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson