Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq’s offer
Arab News ^ | 18 September 2002 | Arab News Editorial

Posted on 09/19/2002 4:16:30 PM PDT by Imal

Iraq’s offer
Arab News Editorial 18 September 2002

Iraq’s decision to back down over arms inspectors and allow them back on without conditions will be regarded by many as a crafty move by a wily tactician intent on by spinning out the process and throwing American strategy into difficulties.

Without doubt, that is precisely what was in Saddam Hussein’s mind. But equally, there can be no doubt that he would not have moved even this far had it not become blindingly clear that after the US decided to go down the UN route, the international community had closed ranks behind it and was intent on passing a UN ultimatum demanding the inspectors’ return. The Saudi announcement that it would cooperate in any action approved by the United Nations further added to the pressure on Baghdad. Saddam’s retreat is proof that he has at last become convinced that he is now standing alone, truly and honestly alone, facing the possibility of finding himself against the entire international community.

But this is not the end of the story, merely the end of a chapter. Despite comments by the Russian prime minister that Iraq’s climb down makes a UN resolution unnecessary, Washington will still push for, and get, an ultimatum spelling out a timetable and requiring Iraq’s total acquiescence. The fear is that without such a resolution, Saddam will delay, procrastinate and give the arms inspectors the general runaround as he did before. He will probably do that anyway despite being confronted with an ultimatum; he cannot afford the inspectors to dig too deeply. Even now it is unclear if his agreement to allow them back in “without conditions” refers to them being permitted back as and when they want or, once in, their being allowed to go where they want, whenever they want.

For Saddam, this seems to be the last chance. The international community is not going to allow him any further twists and turns. The inspectors will pull out the first minute they find their path impeded. That will then move the confrontation back to brinkmanship, with the US again insisting on military action.

Yet for all this skeptical, but thoroughly realistic, view of what Iraq is going to do, the fact remains that it has made a climb down. The ought to be grabbed by the UN and turned back on Iraq. Rather than simply limit the argument to one about arms inspectors, the UN should increase its demands on Iraq. There are many other promises that Baghdad has not kept.

The international community’s opposition to unilateral action by the United States did never mean an endorsement of Iraq’s refusal to deliver on the commitments it made in the cease-fire agreement. These should be incorporated into any resolution on Iraq. It should not just be about weapons of mass destruction; it ought to take into account the interests of the Iraq people. If there are arms inspections, why not also demand inspections of Iraqi prisons to see what is going on there — and, maybe, find the missing Kuwaitis?

The Iraqi regime will, of course, resist such demands but at least the international community will have put the wider moral case for change in Iraq — change that not only removes a major threat to regional and international peace but also brings freedom and security to Iraqis as well.


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arab; arabia; baghdad; editorial; extended; foreign; hussein; iraq; israel; news; saddam; saudi; security; un; war
"Rather than simply limit the argument to one about arms inspectors, the UN should increase its demands on Iraq."

Is this really Arab News? Wow!

1 posted on 09/19/2002 4:16:30 PM PDT by Imal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Imal
it's real alright...they NEED the UN intact for greater goals. iraq can be a victim.
2 posted on 09/19/2002 4:24:45 PM PDT by debg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Imal
Arab News does not print anything in opposition to the Saudi Government. It is not a government mouthpiece, but it has a short leash.

So, this says a lot.

This column favors a UN resolution essentially calling for the overthrow of Saddam. I would say that is a "climb down" on the part of the Saudis.
3 posted on 09/19/2002 4:28:28 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Imal
As Casey Stengel said of his Mets.........

amazing........amazing.....amazing.....amazing...........

4 posted on 09/19/2002 4:32:06 PM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Imal
Saddam has seen the light at the end of the tunnel and realized it is an oncoming train. The clever offer he has made is an invitation to the same dance we did in '98, when he agreed to allow Scott Ritter (the sell-out king) and his inspectors access, BUT not to any "Presidential Palaces". Guess what, suddenly dozens of sites were declared to be "Palaces", some containing literally hundreds of buildings. This offer is "unfettered access to all MILITARY sites". Anybody want to bet your donuts against my dollars we will see all sorts of sites of interest declared civilian and therefore off-limits to inspection?

Hussein is once more trying to buy time, and I don't think we can afford to give it to him. If we wake up one fine morning and find Hussein asking us to guess which of our ports has his Islamic Bomb in a dockside seatainer ready to go, we will be in a whole new world and deeply regret not having moved now. Anyone who thinks the current war/no war option is unpleasant should contemplate this entirely too likely scenario and I would welcome their input as to what good choice we have with that seatainer in place.
5 posted on 09/19/2002 5:36:11 PM PDT by barkeep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: barkeep
Yep. Saddam doesn't seem to understand that this US president isn't as stupid as the last one.
6 posted on 09/19/2002 5:43:17 PM PDT by Imal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: barkeep
with a heavy heart i agree with you completely...may have many of our finest young men and women dead in weeks or months...a difficult thing to accept, especially after wathcing them bring home the body bags on the evening news not so long ago...since nam, over a quarter of a century, and the old men didn't learn a damned thing!
7 posted on 09/19/2002 6:25:54 PM PDT by gPal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gPal
could this article (mubarak) be telling sad damn that he is really on his own as far as the arab league is concerned, just telling him to let the inspectors in, which they must know is the last desperate step before the bombs begin to fall, or absolutely nothing"?...
8 posted on 09/19/2002 6:33:49 PM PDT by gPal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Imal
Is this really Arab News? Wow!

Maybe they were hacked? Another Saudi news outlet, Al Jazieria (sp?) (NOT the Qatari version of CNN Al-Jazeera) published the old Jews use blood in their matzos b-s this week.

9 posted on 09/19/2002 7:14:58 PM PDT by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson