Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tories enlist Bridget Jones to promote pro-marriage policy (UK FAMILY VALUES ALERT)
The Daily Telegraph ^ | September 18, 2002 | George Jones and Sarah Womack

Posted on 09/18/2002 3:23:35 AM PDT by MadIvan

The Conservatives used Bridget Jones to put support for marriage at the heart of their policies for tackling the breakdown of society.

David Willetts, the party's spokesman for work and pensions, last night dismissed Left-wing claims that marriage was an outdated institution. He said that while young people were marrying later, increasing numbers of people followed the book and film heroine's route in looking for the right partner.

"If anything, we have higher hopes of marriage than ever before. We are taking longer to find the right partner, but still searching for that person with whom we want to spend the rest of our lives - just ask Bridget Jones."

Mr Willetts, the party's leading thinker on social policy, confirmed that the Tories were still attracted by the idea of a special tax break for married couples with young children.

At the last election, the Conservatives proposed a transferable personal tax allowance, worth £1,000 a year to many families. It would mean a mother or father who stayed at home to look after children under 11 would be able to transfer their tax allowance to the working spouse.

"We should recognise the good things that flow from the institution of marriage for society as a whole. We should not inadvertently or, even worse, deliberately undermine marriage. And there are ways we can support it directly, as we did before the last election with the transferable tax allowance," Mr Willetts said.

His speech to the Conservative think-tank Policy Exchange follows a fierce debate within the party over the extent to which the Tories should embrace alternative lifestyles in an attempt to show that they are more open and inclusive.

Mr Willetts tried to reconcile opposing viewpoints within the party, acknowledging that it should accept that many young people today preferred to cohabit in long-term relationships, although he indicated that marriage still provided the best background for bringing up children.

The speech will be seen as an indication that Iain Duncan Smith, the Tory leader, has decided that the Conservatives should continue to make a positive declaration in support of marriage.

Mr Willetts praised Mr Duncan Smith's efforts to show that the Conservative Party was changing and demonstrate that it was concerned about the vulnerable in society. He said the remark, attributed to Margaret Thatcher, that "there is no such thing as society" had "hung around our necks for the past 15 years".

Mr Willetts echoed Mr Duncan Smith's accusation that Tony Blair's government had adopted a policy of "moral neutrality" towards the family. He said the "Blairite pundits" claimed that as a nation Britain was abandoning marriage - that it was relegated to "just another lifestyle choice".

Mr Willetts, who is married with two children, said he had read Bridget Jones's Diary and seen the film. The book, which began life as a column serialised in The Telegraph, is a fictional account of a thirtysomething single woman who works in the media and spends her life fretting about her romantic disasters and looking for Mr Right.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: bridgetjones; familyvalues; uk; usa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
Well it's not all bad out there then. Reports of the demise of British marriage and romance are greatly exaggerated. ;)

Regards, Ivan


1 posted on 09/18/2002 3:23:35 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: schmelvin; MJY1288; fivekid; jjm2111; LonePalm; Gracey; Aric2000; Happygal; justshe; tet68; ...
Bump!
2 posted on 09/18/2002 3:23:56 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I will only buy this spin...if I get to go home with a Colin Firth type ;-)
3 posted on 09/18/2002 3:43:29 AM PDT by Happygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Oh, why don't they just use the real thing and appeal to the young to re-read Austen. The original was a much better story. Elizabeth Bennett is a much more interesting character than Bridget Jones. OTOH, she's also virtuous. That may not go over well.
4 posted on 09/18/2002 4:38:22 AM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
Oh, why don't they just use the real thing and appeal to the young to re-read Austen.

That may appeal to young ladies, but I found Jane Austen unbelievably tedious when I was in school. I much preferred Charles Dickens at that age.

The original was a much better story. Elizabeth Bennett is a much more interesting character than Bridget Jones. OTOH, she's also virtuous. That may not go over well.

Well Pride and Prejudice was popular as a television series, even with the virtue. ;)

Regards, Ivan

5 posted on 09/18/2002 4:42:47 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Editorial comment re Dickens: Zzzzz....Zzzzzzz....

And yes, I'm quickly wearing out my copy (all six episodes) of the Colin Firth/Jennifer Ehle version of P&P.
6 posted on 09/18/2002 6:21:33 AM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
Editorial comment re Dickens: Zzzzz....Zzzzzzz....

It's a bloke thing, you wouldn't understand. ;)

And yes, I'm quickly wearing out my copy (all six episodes) of the Colin Firth/Jennifer Ehle version of P&P

Not entirely for the story, one presumes. ;)

Regards, Ivan

7 posted on 09/18/2002 6:27:19 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Of course I watch Pride & Prejudice for the story. Those had to be the worst costumes Colin Firth ever wore. Definitely didn't show off enough at all. And they never combed his hair either.
8 posted on 09/18/2002 6:38:25 AM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
Those had to be the worst costumes Colin Firth ever wore. Definitely didn't show off enough at all. And they never combed his hair either.

I take it from this post, however, you were actively exercising your imagination. ;)

Regards, Ivan

9 posted on 09/18/2002 6:39:14 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
A lady should NEVER publish all her private thoughts... Just the more pert ones.
10 posted on 09/18/2002 6:45:13 AM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
A lady should NEVER publish all her private thoughts... Just the more pert ones

In some cases no publishing is required, as they are perfectly obvious. ;)

Regards, Ivan

11 posted on 09/18/2002 6:48:09 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
So, you read minds, Ivan? Do you?

Well, there's a couple other British actors out there just as yummy as Firth. Although, none of them could have Darcy like he did. There's a scene in "An Ideal Husband" in the steam bath...nevermind. It's a chick thing.
12 posted on 09/18/2002 6:54:10 AM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Make that could have nailed Darcy. In the sense of really turning him into the arrogant, conceited, proud guy that he is.
13 posted on 09/18/2002 6:55:39 AM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
So, you read minds, Ivan? Do you?

I don't have to, when you say things about Colin Firth being "yummy". ;)

Well, there's a couple other British actors out there just as yummy as Firth. Although, none of them could have Darcy like he did. There's a scene in "An Ideal Husband" in the steam bath...nevermind. It's a chick thing.

Yes, it most definitely is. And this is a bloke thing:

;)

Regards, Ivan

14 posted on 09/18/2002 6:59:28 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
Make that could have nailed Darcy.

I'll read a Freudian slip into both statements. ;)

Regards, Ivan

15 posted on 09/18/2002 7:00:10 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Okay, enough with Renee Fleming.
16 posted on 09/18/2002 7:01:13 AM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
Okay, enough with Renee Fleming.

Well you started it. You bring up Colin Firth, I bring up the lovely Renee, and we counter from there. ;)

Regards, Ivan

17 posted on 09/18/2002 7:02:15 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
No, I didn't bring up Colin Firth. YOU said you were sure I was watching P&P for the story in a "yeah, right" kind of way. I just answered it.

And for the record, I'm waiting, impatiently, for a movie, film, whatever, with BOTH Colin Firth and Jeremy Northam. A little Rupert Everett wouldn't hurt. Talk about eye candy. Wouldn't quite be as delicious as last year's version of "Ocean's Eleven" but close.
18 posted on 09/18/2002 7:16:04 AM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
YOU said you were sure I was watching P&P for the story in a "yeah, right" kind of way. I just answered it.

That isn't the same as me bringing up Colin Firth. ;) Sorry, dear, but playing the diva this time around won't save you. ;)

grinning wickedly

And for the record, I'm waiting, impatiently, for a movie, film, whatever, with BOTH Colin Firth and Jeremy Northam. A little Rupert Everett wouldn't hurt. Talk about eye candy. Wouldn't quite be as delicious as last year's version of "Ocean's Eleven" but close.

Are you trying to bring on a blitz of Renee? ;)

Regards, Ivan

19 posted on 09/18/2002 7:18:57 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
You and your crush of Fleming...Ivan, what are we to do with you?

Wait - don't answer that.
20 posted on 09/18/2002 7:22:05 AM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson