Posted on 09/17/2002 7:31:29 PM PDT by greydog
Edited on 04/12/2004 5:43:55 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
WASHINGTON -- Sen. John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat who aspires to be the 44th president, accuses the 43rd of "hasty war talk." The adjective "hasty" suggests impetuousness. But although the president's policy acquired special urgency with the terrorist attacks, the thrust of the policy was a campaign theme of candidate Bush before the first primary of 2000.
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
By the way, I've been offline for 3 weeks (processor fried) and under "my comments" there is a slew of "gotta see this" posts.
What goes here?
I mention this, because I think his son might be making a similar mistake...and the democrats are doing their best to tie one hand behind Dubya's back.
Old Send in the Ground Trops Kerry was singing a different tune when the war in question was against Serbia over Kosovo!!!! And NO ONE was thinking that Serbia was developing weaponsof mass destruction, or in any wayu was a threat to either America or her allies!
What was the REAL difference in Kerry's thinking between Serbia in 1999 and Iraq in 2001? Was it Serbophobic racism? Or was it a NWO desire to please the World Empire's muslim clients?
This is the comparison that finally brought Bush's message home to me. But Hitler was not only an aggressor. He virtually anhilated an entire generation of Germans through warfare. Saddam Hussein may sit in the ME rather than the heart of Europe, but I don't see that he is any less a merchant of chaos. The world doesn't need Aryan supremacy, nor Hussein as an exemplar of "Islamic power"
What?
Haha....oi...nevermind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.