Posted on 09/17/2002 4:16:06 AM PDT by Alouette
It is a familiar pattern.
A well-known Diaspora Jewish figure speaks out in a secular-news outlet denouncing Israeli policies.
While the majority of Jews gasp at the chutzpah of the denunciation, commentators and journalists speak in hushed tones about the trials and tribulations that the dissenter will be subjected to for breaking with Israel. A few pro-Israel stalwarts will voice outrage, but most of the reaction will, however, center on the "courage" that the Israel critic has shown. All of which will be pure bunk.
Far from having to pay a price for bashing Israel, the critic will be showered with praise and spend the rest of his or her public career having unique access to the opinion pages of secular newspapers, and being the favorite source for prominent journalists searching for a Jewish voice to use against the Jewish state.
This routine has just been played again in Britain, where no less a figure than the highly respected chief rabbi of the United Kingdom, Jonathan Sacks, earned applause for telling the Guardian - England's most notoriously anti-Israel newspaper - that Israel's self-defense against a two-year war of Palestinian terror makes him "feel very uncomfortable as a Jew."
Headlined "Israel Set on Tragic Path," Sacks confided to the left-wing paper that "the current situation is forcing Israel into postures that are incompatible in the long run with our deepest ideals."
Predictably, Sacks expressed support for Israel, and later said his remarks were taken out of context. (Has anyone else noticed that the two groups most likely to complain about being misquoted are professional athletes and rabbis?)
But most of the commentary after the fact centered on how gutsy the stuffy rabbi - who prefers to be called "professor" - had been to call into question the morality of Israeli actions.
(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...
JPS: Shoftim 5:23 'Curse ye Meroz', said the angel of HaShem, 'Curse ye bitterly the inhabitants thereof, because they came not to the help of HaShem, to the help of HaShem against the mighty.'
The left seems to revel not only in the creating of victims (whom they can help) but seem sustained by a sense of individual victimization. Its fine for Rabbi Sacks to express his opinion, but statements that the secular actions of Israel make Sacks "feel very uncomfortable as a Jew" demonstrates to me a Clinton sized ego rather than a sincere concern for solving the problems on the ground. Maybe Id understand if he was riding an Egged bus to work every day.
I wonder whether Sacks takes Yom Kippur seriously.....
The Orthodox Rabbi said,"To ask God to forgive us our sins"
The Conservative Rabbi said, "We think it might have something to do with the antiquated belief in sin"
Jonathan Sacks said, "Screw it, want a bite of my ham and cheese?"
Religion can be a "form of conflict resolution". As long as everyone got a ham and cheese sandwich, and no one got more mustard that his neighbor, there'd be nothing to fight about, and Rabbi Sacks would be fine with it.
Can I, a Jew, hear the echoes of God's voice in that of a Hindu, or a Sikh, or a Muslim?
We will make peace only when we learn that God loves difference and so, at last, must we. God has created many cultures, civilisations and faiths, but only one world in which to live together - and it is getting smaller all the time.
Imagine that. Judaism says that the world will make peace when Mochiach comes. Rabbi Sacks can't seem to find room for Moshiach in his Judaism. He must be too busy making sure his fellow Jews will be making pork- kosher.
Theres no role for Moshiach in Rabí Sacks vision of a shrinking world, and accomodation for those who would rid the world of Jews (faith is a conflict resolver, after all). All beliefs are equal, even to the believer, to think otherwise is extremism, and if you believe it well all get along. I almost think he revels, from a very safe distance, in a sense of impending victimization, hell be a victim of his own superior morality, of course. Fine for him, not for me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.