Skip to comments.
Massive world recession to occur if
Iraq attacked: Economist
XINHUA NEWS AGENCY / Drudge ^
Posted on 09/13/2002 5:29:40 PM PDT by RCW2001
Massive world recession to occur if Iraq attacked: Economist |
|
|
|
HONG KONG, Sept 12, 2002 (Xinhua via COMTEX) -- The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), which operates under the Economist magazine, predicted that the world would suffer a massive recession if Iraq were attacked and Middle East oil producers protested by pushing up the oil price. Robin Bew, the chief economist of the EIU, told Xinhua in a written commentary Thursday, "Our forecasts assume that the United States does attack Iraq, and that the Middle East oil producers oppose the US action and team up to cut oil production, and thereby, pushing the oil price to, say, 70 US dollars a barrel or more, that would deliver a massive supply-side shock to the global economy and probably trigger a massive recession, similar to the oil shocks in the 1970s," Bew said. Turning to the US economy, Christopher Nailer, the Singapore- based regional economist of the EIU, also told Xinhua in the commentary that the current imbalance in the US economy is severe, saying that sluggish growth is forecast for both 2002 and 2003. "We expect the US economy to grow only 2.4 percent in 2002 and accelerate to only 2.8 percent in 2003. This is better than 2001 when the US economy grew only 0.3 percent, but still very weak. "However, the imbalance in the US economy is severe, and we rate the possibility of a major recession - worse than the 2001 one - within the next two years as a 30 percent probability," Nailer said.
Copyright 2002 XINHUA NEWS AGENCY. |
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: dogbyte12
Right. 500 M1A1's and 250,000 P.O.'ed American troops right over the horizon. These tin pot oil Ho's will be GIVING petroleum to us and will thank us for taking it.
To: RCW2001
Current indications are that if we attack Iraq, the other Arabs will do virtually nothing.
22
posted on
09/13/2002 6:03:02 PM PDT
by
Cicero
To: RCW2001
"However, the imbalance in the US economy is severe, and we rate the possibility of a major recession - worse than the 2001 one - within the next two years as a 30 percent probability," Nailer said. 30% chance. Gee, that's really going out on a limb!
So I guess we have a 70% chance of having a decent economy if we attack Iraq. I'll take those odds.
To: leadhead; RCW2001
<< Bad assumptions. US attacks,in 96 hrs. US controls 2nd largest known oil reserves. Opec shits pants at prospect of competition. Thousands of fat, greasey diaper heads in Saudi commit suicide because their payment for little boys cut off. >>
Gee whiz!
What you just said here is awful!
And I liked it very much, so here it is again!
To: evolved_rage
Like that growth spurt that started last time we attacked Iraq???
'Zackly
To: RCW2001
The Saudi's need the money now. If the money spigit is cut back, and the welfare state is truncated, the Royal Family might be out. I wonder if the gurus at The Economist thought about that.
26
posted on
09/13/2002 6:38:45 PM PDT
by
Torie
To: dogbyte12
If oil shipments are reduced out of the gulf and the prices sky rocket,That would last 10 minutes, just like it did after the Gulf war. Russia, Mexico, Venezuela, etc. would turn on the spigots, Congress would vote to open ANWR, and the price of oil would go way down.
There's more oil than the world needs, and countries that have economies based on oil don't dare risk having other sources become available.
To: RCW2001
I'd rather be broke than dead, I can always make more money.
28
posted on
09/13/2002 6:46:54 PM PDT
by
SCHROLL
To: RCW2001
You can see what the Ecomomist Intelligence Unit (EIU) is
really saying at
this website. I don't see anything about a world recession.
29
posted on
09/13/2002 6:51:31 PM PDT
by
be131
To: RCW2001
I am looking into my crystal ball.. looking.. WAIT a sec Wait a sec... The future is bright, I see oil, lots of oil..
I just proved them wrong.
30
posted on
09/13/2002 7:10:26 PM PDT
by
aSkeptic
To: ex-snook
Bush was given the great opportunity to bring peace to the Near East, a businessman's properity to the country and a downsizing of government (deficit was rising long before 9/11). He has screwed up on all counts, as they say, BIG TIME. I just thought I'd acknowledge your post, since everyone else thinks it's bullshit, as I do.
31
posted on
09/13/2002 7:19:22 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
To: leadhead
Bad assumptions. US attacks,in 96 hrs. US controls 2nd largest known oil reserves. We don't even have to take Baghdad. Just seize the oil fields, surround them with our troops, start pumping oil at full speed as compensation for all the stuff that Sadaam has pulled.
To: nutmeg
Bump for later
33
posted on
09/13/2002 10:32:25 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
To: SauronOfMordor
Now there's a thought, we just move right to the outskirts of Baghdad. Pump all the oil we want, and let the citizens come out of the city one at a time. By next summer, the only person in the city would be Saddam, then we just level the place, give them their oil back, and let them pay for building anew.
34
posted on
09/13/2002 10:53:13 PM PDT
by
Aric2000
To: RCW2001
World recession?...XINHUE must of mistook me for someone who gives a shit.
35
posted on
09/13/2002 10:58:10 PM PDT
by
alphadog
To: RCW2001
I particularly like this part: "...and thereby, pushing the oil price to, say, 70 US dollars a barrel or more...". Yeah, that's a good technical analysis if ever there was one. A random character generator could do better.
This article has as much credibility as everything else Xinhua prints.
Imal
36
posted on
09/14/2002 12:08:53 AM PDT
by
Imal
To: JennysCool
I read that Kuwait will most likely help us with more oil. At the same time, we have a large strategic oil reserve now. Bush has his ducks in a row. And Saudi Arabia is reportedly cash strapped right now to boot.
To: RCW2001
Wow, this is like deja vu all over again. They said the same thing last time we attacked Iraq. I'm sure he is right. We should all sit here on our butts and wait to be nuked. That would be much better for the world economy.
38
posted on
09/14/2002 4:54:18 AM PDT
by
foolscap
To: leadhead
Thousands of fat, greasey diaper heads in Saudi commit suicide because their payment for little boys cut off.Good heavans! I thought I was hard on them. LOL! You wouldn't be having any social issues with the Arab community, would you?
To: leadhead
Thousands of fat, greasey diaper heads in Saudi commit suicide because their payment for little boys cut off.I was tempted to mention pampers, triple absorbant, but well, I suppose I should show some consideration toward our alleged allies.
When I stop laughing, I'll tell you how ashamed you should be of yourself for being so hateful toward an entire people, not all of whom rape little boys and/or wish us ill. But in the meantime... ROFL!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson