Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There and Back Again: Apollo 12 part spotted?
SpaceRef.com ^ | September 11, 2002 | Paul Chodas

Posted on 09/12/2002 8:40:11 AM PDT by cogitator

Newly Discovered Object Could be a Leftover Apollo Rocket Stage

An analysis of the orbital motion of the newly discovered object J002E3 indicates that it could be a leftover Saturn V third stage from one of the Apollo missions, most likely the Apollo 12 mission, launched on November 14, 1969.

The new object was discovered on September 3 by Bill Yeung, who noted that it was moving quite rapidly. Initial orbit computations by the Minor Planet Center indicated that the object was only about twice as far away as the Moon, and was actually in orbit about our planet. This fact, combined with the rather faint intrinsic magnitude, immediately led astronomers to suspect that the object is actually a spacecraft or rocket body, not an asteroid. But the object could not be associated with any recent launch.

J002E3 is currently observable at magnitude 16.5; it is easily detectable in asteroid surveys, and even bright enough to be seen by many amateur astronomers. If it is a leftover piece from an old launch, why was it not discovered until last week? A backwards analysis of the orbital motion provides the answer: the object was apparently captured by the Earth from heliocentric orbit in April of this year. The capture occurred when the object passed near the Earth's L1 Lagrange point, a location where the gravity of the Earth and Sun approximately cancel. This point serves as "portal" between the regions of space controlled by the Earth and Sun. J002E3 is the first known case of an object being captured by the Earth, although Jupiter has been known to capture comets via the same mechanism. (For example, Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9, which collided with Jupiter in 1994, had been captured by Jupiter decades earlier.)

Analysis of J002E3's pre-capture orbit about the Sun shows that the object was always inside the Earth's orbit, and that it may have come within the Earth's vicinity in the early 1970s or late 1960s. Many of the test cases in our analysis in fact passed through the L1 portal, back into Earth orbit (going backwards in time) during the early 1970s. In other words, this object was very likely orbiting the Earth during this period before escaping into the heliocentric orbit from which it was captured in 2002. It seems quite likely that this object is one of the Apollo Saturn S-IVB third stages which flew by the Moon during this era (Apollos 8 through 12). The brightness of J002E3 seems to match the expected brightness of an S-IVB stage. Further circumstantial evidence suggests that this object is in fact the Apollo 12 stage, which was left in a very distant Earth orbit after it passed by the Moon on November 18, 1969. This spent rocket body was last seen in an Earth orbit with a period of 43 days, not much different from J002E3's current orbit.

The future motion of J002E3 is also very interesting. A similar orbital analysis which takes into account the current orbit uncertainties shows that the object has a surprisingly large 20 percent chance of impacting the Moon in 2003. Such a lunar impact would not be unprecedented: NASA intentionally impacted five Apollo S-IVB stages on the Moon from 1970 through 1972 (Apollos 13 through 17), as an experiment to study the interior structure of the Moon. Looking further into the future is problematic, due to the chaotic nature of J002E3's orbit, but our current analysis shows the object to have about a 3 percent chance of impacting the Earth within the next 10 years. This should not be of concern to the public. Apollo stages have impacted the Earth before, in the 1960s, and the larger Skylab re-entered in the 1970s. (The even larger Mir Space Station was intentionally impacted into the Pacific Ocean in March 2001.)

Additional positional observations of this object are being received daily, and our knowledge and modeling of its orbit continues to improve. The collision probabilities mentioned above will change as we are able to make more precise predictions.

Animations showing how J002E3 was captured into its current chaotic orbit around the Earth are available on the Near-Earth Object Program website:

http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2003aa29; 2006rh120; apollo12; asteroid; booster; cruithne; earthcrossers; j002e3; minimoon; minimoons; minormoon; moon; nearearthobject; object; quasisatellite; quasisatellites; rh120; space; toutatis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: jennyp
Not quite a moon. I think "companion" is a better word. See http://www.astro.queensu.ca/~wiegert/3753/3753.html for more info.
21 posted on 09/12/2002 12:33:36 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RonF
You mean my 12X63 binocs won't do it? A decent 6" is currently outside my budget.
22 posted on 09/12/2002 12:38:43 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke
Actually, take a look at here. Page forward through it. This says that in a rural dark sky, a 12.5" scope ought to be able to see 16th magnitude, but in a bright suburban sky you'd need a 16".
23 posted on 09/12/2002 12:59:52 PM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: A tall man in a cowboy hat; cogitator
Well recovering the old satellites would be a good start.

The rub is the fuel and energy required to accomplish the orbital rendezvous for this endeavor. Is it actually worth the effort to attempt recovery of non-working obsolete space debris? IMHO, it is not.

24 posted on 09/12/2002 5:33:25 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
Thanks for the ping :-)
25 posted on 09/12/2002 5:33:54 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
Looks like Cruithne's closest approach is in 2285 @ 9.3 million miles. We probably won't be visiting it anytime soon.
26 posted on 09/12/2002 5:43:25 PM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Is it actually worth the effort to attempt recovery of non-working obsolete space debris?

Non-working, no (though if recovery was feasible, grabbing an old Saturn launch stage would be cool). The article that I read was about recovering satellites that are still functional but pretty much non-functional due to depletion of maneuvering fuel, or possible some glitches that could be fixed with a bit of new circuitry.

27 posted on 09/16/2002 8:13:06 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: A tall man in a cowboy hat
should you need a license to mine and astroid

If a person or company wishes the protection of a sovereign state for ground operations, then one would need approval from that sovereign state. Also, thanks to the 1967 UN Treaty on Outer Space, which most countries signed, no country can claim any outer space resources. So, you are in a bind and no smooth-talking sales staff can change that.

29 posted on 09/16/2002 12:12:24 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator

To: A tall man in a cowboy hat
I am not a country

If a person wished to do business, he would go to the market. The market is in countries. Mine all the asteroids you want, but if you wish to make a dollar you must deliver your product. All countries are prohibited from receiving celestial resources thanks to the 1967 UN Treaty on Outer Space. Before a country can license the business, it must withdraw from the treaty.

31 posted on 09/17/2002 9:28:15 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
BUMP
32 posted on 09/17/2002 9:33:51 AM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: A tall man in a cowboy hat
"black market."

What, a black market for iron and aluminum? Those being the main products to be expected from space mining, the ones that will turn a profit.

34 posted on 09/17/2002 10:05:30 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
"If a person wished to do business, he would go to the market. The market is in countries. Mine all the asteroids you want, but if you wish to make a dollar you must deliver your product. All countries are prohibited from receiving celestial resources thanks to the 1967 UN Treaty on Outer Space. Before a country can license the business, it must withdraw from the treaty."

But since only the United States and a few of our allies bother to obey International Treaties, that still leaves 2/3 of the earth as a market. Provided that you could mine the moon or asteroids cheaper than you could on Earth (Probably impossible with current technology)


35 posted on 09/17/2002 10:24:29 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: apillar
that still leaves 2/3 of the earth as a market

What? And suffer the wrath of the UN? Kofi will be disappointed to know of this.

36 posted on 09/17/2002 11:55:12 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson