Batman's arch-enemy, The Penguin speaks again!
Posted on 09/09/2002 2:32:04 PM PDT by mhking
We are still trying to fathom the depths of the hatred that brought this incredible catastrophe to our land and transformed our lives. The fallout from the tragedy, with its senseless loss of life, will be felt for years to come. Indeed, it was a sad turning point for America.
Since then, we have learned some truths about ourselves. Happily, one is that we as a nation will always rally together in a crisis and meet the challenges. But another is that our image in the eyes of others is not what it is to us. Many see us as arrogant and uncaring about the rest of the world.
The surprise assault on Sept. 11 made us realize that we are no longer protected by two oceans and that we could be as vulnerable to outside attacks as any small nation.
In the early days after our siege, President George W. Bush found a sympathetic world anxious to help. Foreign leaders seemed willing to overlook his earlier appalling approach to foreign policy -- repudiating some environmental and collective security agreements. For a time, Bush became an internationalist in search of allies.
Soon, however, with his conservative advisers egging him on, he proclaimed a new doctrine that smacks of old imperialism -- that we have the right to strike militarily anywhere without provocation.
This policy of preemption -- might is right -- is antithetical to what America has always stood for -- "magnanimity in victory," as Winston Churchill once put it, helping our former enemies and rejecting policies dictated by vengeance.
Since that fateful September day, we attacked Afghanistan and destroyed the inhumane Taliban regime, hoping to erect a democracy in its place.
Yet, I keep remembering Bush's ominous New Year's message. "This is the first war of the 21st century," he said. Is that any way to inspire the nation?
Bush claims the terrorists are motivated by hostility to our freedom. Others see them impelled by religious zealotry. But the motivation for such virulent hatred obviously deserves more probing. And we need to hear what our government, which has interrogated so many suspects, has learned.
In our personal lives since Sept. 11, we have seen a widespread acceptance of unprecedented "big brother" security measures. Much of our fear has subsided, but apprehension and concern remain over possible future attacks.
Americans wonder if they should fly anymore. For a time, fear gripped children who saw on television the blazing ruins of the World Trade Center towers and one side of the Pentagon and soon learned that these scenes were not just a surreal horror movie.
Many people of all ages found their natural self-confidence temporarily shattered. Significant segments of the population -- particularly Arabs and Muslims -- are viewed with suspicion: Stereotyping and racial profiling are back in style.
Americans of Middle Eastern heritage were outraged when Peter Kirsanow, a conservative member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, reportedly suggested in July that the public would support their detention in internment camps if there is another Arab terrorist attack on the United States.
The Detroit Free Press reported he made the remarks at a commission hearing, predicting in effect that these citizens would be treated in the same egregious way that Japanese Americans were during World War II.
The Free Press quoted Kirsanow as saying later he personally did not support such camps. He also said after the article appeared that it had misinterpreted his remarks, a charge the paper denied.
When I talked recently to a commission spokeswoman, she called the comments "unfortunate." But the damage was done. Many Arab and Muslim Americans felt that such a scenario is possible and that they might be the victims.
To meet potential threats, the federal government has tightened security at airports, borders and public buildings. It created colored alerts to show degrees of danger, but they only left people unsure of where to hide and what to be afraid of.
Our leaders began using the alien term "homeland security," and it is now part of our everyday vocabulary.
Also in the name of security, the Justice Department has taken more intrusive measures such as listening in on conversations between lawyers and clients in terrorism cases and going to court more often to get approval for wiretaps and access to e-mail.
The government has designated hundreds of fighters captured in Afghanistan as "detainees" and denied them prisoner-of-war rights under the Geneva Accords.
Federal officials are more tightly scrutinizing would-be immigrants. And the government is employing wholesale deportations, ruling out appeals to the courts by detainees found in violation of visa laws.
What other arrows do Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Attorney General John Ashcroft have in their quivers? Who or what might stop them? Maybe the courts will. They seem to be more combative as more constitutional rights are being set aside.
In this atmosphere, many Americans have become wary of dissent and criticism of the administration. Many Democrats, in particular, have lost their voices as the loyal opposition.
In the post-Sept. 11 era we have ventured into uncharted territory. But I don't believe we have to lose our traditional spirit of tolerance or undermine the primacy of our constitutional rights to win the war on terrorism.
In fact, if that happened, we would lose much more than we would gain.
(Helen Thomas can be reached at helent@hearstdc.com)
I remember an old PEANUTS comic strip where Lucy tells Linus, "Your stupidity is appalling." Linus replied, "Most stupidity is."
Well Linus, that is true. where were you in the late 90's when Clinton and Daschle were telling us that Saddam must be removed militarily?
" But the motivation for such virulent hatred obviously deserves more probing. "
Let's go back in history and try to understand the Nazis. Maybe if we weren't so intolerant of there desire to rule the world and kill all Jews, then maybe we could avoid war. I'll give you a probe. Islamic extremists want to destroy us because we represent everything they hate. Our freedom, of speech, our freedom of religion, our freedom of the PRESS. They hate us because we don't kill homosexuals and we let women go to school and have an education and horror of horrors, we let them show their face in public.
"In fact, if that happened, we would lose much more than we would gain. "
Here in the south my dad raised me to look at all people as special and having dignity. I was surprised when I got older that some people disliked black, Jews, and folks who's named ended in vowels. I am glad to say we have come a long way, tho' we still have further to do. But if 99 % of all terrorists acts against America had been committed by middle aged white guys with thinning hair, then I would expect to be looked over very carefully at the airport. And I WOULD understand.
"Many people of all ages found their natural self-confidence temporarily shattered. Significant segments of the population -- particularly Arabs and Muslims -- are viewed with suspicion: Stereotyping and racial profiling are back in style. "
Since the thrust of your article was to blame the Bush Administration for what you do not like, I have to take particular exception the above quote. The President has gone to the extreme to ask Americans to refrain from stereotypes and prejudices. You tho' distort the truth to try make yourself like wise and all knowing. My father who taught me colorblindness, and honesty, and care for my fellow man, and compassion for others also told me that a distortion of the truth was a terrible thing, it was a LIE. I can never ever trust anything you write or say because you have intentionally lied and tried to deceive. Shame on you! Having been weighed in the balances, you have been found wanting.
...
|
|
You're a better man than I. I didn't make it past the first sentence. |
Interrogations reveal: they hate us because women work outside the home here while they are embarrassed that they live like slaves and have nothing. They hate us because the few leaders that own everything in their countries say it's our fault.
Suffice to say, she should have quit while she ahead.
I was watching History Channel's look back at the past year last week. One night they interviewed CBS correspondants one after the other who were saying "I think this" and "I think that". I don't care what these vermin think. I want them to report what they see, not give me their biases opinions on everything.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
.jpg)
