2, I see that I have not misread your hostility. You continue to dismiss my honest attempts to communicate with insults like "disingenuous" and "anti-American".
And I see that I have not misread your hostility. Or hypocrisy.
Our "representatives" may indeed have been answering to the popular will in enacting these laws, but regardless of that, they have exceeded their Constitutional Authority, and these laws are for that reason illegitimate.
Bologna. Baseless, of course.
If my comments have offended you in any way, I apologize. But it is you who have consistently expressed hostility, and declined to present reasoned argument to support your own viewpoint.
You accuse me of hypocrisy. Very well, on what basis? Just saying that I am a hypocrite will not convince me or anyone else.
Bologna. Baseless, of course.
Again, you dismiss without rebuttal. My conclusion is that you have no rebuttal to deliver.
Once again, I assert that there is an obvious conflict between the current Federal "War on Drugs" (prosecuted without Constitutional support), and the prior perceived need to enact a Constitutional Amendment before the feds could presume to prohibit the production, sale, transportation or use of alcohol.