Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Roscoe
And I see that I have not misread your hostility. Or hypocrisy.

If my comments have offended you in any way, I apologize. But it is you who have consistently expressed hostility, and declined to present reasoned argument to support your own viewpoint.

You accuse me of hypocrisy. Very well, on what basis? Just saying that I am a hypocrite will not convince me or anyone else.

Bologna. Baseless, of course.

Again, you dismiss without rebuttal. My conclusion is that you have no rebuttal to deliver.

Once again, I assert that there is an obvious conflict between the current Federal "War on Drugs" (prosecuted without Constitutional support), and the prior perceived need to enact a Constitutional Amendment before the feds could presume to prohibit the production, sale, transportation or use of alcohol.

664 posted on 09/25/2002 2:31:39 PM PDT by SJC_Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 662 | View Replies ]


To: SJC_Libertarian
Again, you dismiss without rebuttal.

https://www.tourolaw.edu/2ndcircuit/november96/96-2060.html

Now, what was the basis for your assertion that " they have exceeded their Constitutional Authority, and these laws are for that reason illegitimate?"

666 posted on 09/25/2002 2:36:03 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 664 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson