[SJC_Libertarian]

It seems no matter where the conversation starts with a Libertarian it always seems to end up with a discussion about drugs.

That's odd, I was attempting to set the record straight about Steve Kubby. If the subject arose about how some Republican took insulin for his diabetes, or was undergoing chemotherapy for his prostate cancer, would you call that "a discussion about drugs"?

Rather than defaming me as only being concerned with drugs, why don't you try engaging me in a substantive discussion on some other subject, like RKBA?

[Roscoe]

That's odd, I was attempting to set the record straight about Steve Kubby.

Backwards. You were attempting to misrepresent the facts.

It was noted that, "Their 1998 candidate for Governor of California has fled to Canada after a couple of drug convictions."

You disingenuously replied, "A bit misinformed, aren't you? Steve Kubby is suffering from Adrenal Cancer, and requires cannabis..."

Kubby's drug convictions were not for "cannabis."

[freebilly]

Rather than defaming me as only being concerned with drugs, why don't you try engaging me in a substantive discussion on some other subject, like RKBA?

Why would I debate you on the 2nd Amendment? Unfortunately, those who would debate you are not going to be swayed from their opinion that there need to be more gun laws and restrictions on gun ownership.