Clinton leads the revolt against war (PROJECTILE VOMITING ALERT)

The Evening Standard ^ | September 6, 2002 | Joe Murphy

[MadIvan]

Tony Blair and George Bush today face mounting opposition to the war on Iraq from both sides of the Atlantic.

In Britain, a survey of Labour MPs showed almost zero backing for military attacks on Saddam Hussein's regime.

And in the States, former president Bill Clinton led a growing chorus of demands to postpone action until Osama bin Laden, the terrorist godfather thought to be behind the 11 September atrocities, is caught.

In another blow, the head of the intelligence committee in Congress, Bob Graham, also called for war to be postponed until Afghanistan was dealt with.

Mr Blair, who flies to Camp David tomorrow for a war summit with President Bush, came under pressure from Robin Cook, the leading "dove" in the Cabinet who pressed for MPs to be given a Commons vote on the issue.

Number 10 has so far refused to promise a vote and has rejected an early recall of Parliament to debate the crisis.

But Mr Cook said that before the original Gulf War in 1990, Labour and the Conservatives agreed to hold a vote.

"I am sure that this Labour government will be aware of that precedent," he said in an interview with the Financial Times.

Mr Cook, the Leader of the Commons, also demanded that military action be conducted under the auspices of the United Nations. "If we are to succeed in curbing Saddam's military ambitions, we have a better chance of success if we have the world with us and Saddam isolated," he said.

The scale of opposition among backbenchers was revealed in a survey of 100 Labour MPs carried out by the BBC. Only four said they thought there were currently sufficient grounds to declare war on Iraq, compared with 88 who did not.

Almost nine in 10 - 86 per cent - said there should be a Commons vote before the Cabinet takes a decision on military action. That was a direct challenge to ministers who have only offered a debate, without a vote, after the Cabinet has made up its mind.

Tensions were also growing in America, where Mr Clinton used a fundraising gala in California to attack President Bush for targeting Saddam Hussein before "finishing the job" in Afghanistan.

"Saddam Hussein didn't kill 3,100 people on 11 September," declared Mr Clinton. "Osama bin Laden did, and as far as we know he is still alive. Before we give up the effort in Afghanistan we need to finish the job. Bin Laden is still our biggest security threat."

Mr Clinton also warned that a strike against Saddam would strip the Iraqi leader of any incentive to hold off using chemical and biological weapons. He said: "Saddam Hussein is not a good man by our definition. There is no question that he has significant stocks of chemical and biological agents.

"I think we have to assume that if he knows we're coming, he'll do everything he can to use them. He has maximum incentive not to use the stuff. If we go in, he has maximum incentive to use it because he knows he's going to lose. That's a risk and it's an issue the President-has to address." The former president-said America should be trying to "lead the world" not "run the world". And he warned that Saddam was "admired" by many ordinary Arabs.

Labour MPs were furious today that Mr Blair decalred in a television documentary that he was prepared to pay the "blood price" needed to preserve the special relationship with the US.

He insisted that the UK must be there "when the shooting starts" to maintain its most important alliance.

Mr Blair will fly to Russia on Monday for talks with Vladimir Putin, his first piece of shuttle diplomacy on behalf of the fledgling coalition.

Russian backing is vital because Mr Putin has the power to veto any UN resolution as a permanent member of the UN security council.

Jack Straw will today insist it would be "wildly irresponsible" to rule out military action against Saddam. In a speech at Birmingham University, the Foreign Secretary will say: "Until Saddam co-operates fully with UN weapons inspectors, we have no guarantees that a dictator who has previously shown no restraint in using weapons of mass destruction will not use them again."

[MeekOneGOP]

heh heh !

[MeekOneGOP]

Sometimes hillary throws ashtrays, and sometimes she has a nasty bite!

http://www.las-cruces.org/museums/natural-history/images/hillary.jpg

[mhking]

Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.

[Clara Lou]

we need to finish the job
Take it from Filthy Bill-- we need to finish what he was too cowardly or too disinterested (or both) to start-- the scum!

[MadIvan]

Take it from Filthy Bill-- we need to finish what he was too cowardly or too disinterested (or both) to start-- the scum!

The only kind of job he ever finished involved using the bathroom sink or an intern, whichever was most handy (he said, as delicately as possible).

I like your moniker for him, "Filthy Bill", very much. ;)

Regards, Ivan

[desertcry]

Tiney tommy, and tiney dickie is just taking orders from you know who: her highness, hillary the bitch. You may ask by what means does her highness able to enslave the demons of congress? Simple, it's called MONEY. The clintons have had 9 years to accumulate their ill-gotten rotten money. It is through this billion dollar stash that they control the democrat party. The evil duo are cooking the American Taxpayers with their own fat sad to say.

[nopardons]

You should know, Brian. Now, dear, go back to your ward, before they realize that you're using the computer again, without permission. :^ )