Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peacock Tease
New Times ^ | 8-22-2002 | Tony Ortega

Posted on 08/28/2002 1:31:22 PM PDT by JennysCool

New Times contributor is fired for faking story about nonexistent NBC "reality" show.

BY TONY ORTEGA

New Times L.A. freelance writer Antoine Oman was fired last week for fabricating a story about teenage rape victims Tamara Brooks and Jackie Marris.

Oman, who had a short history with the alternative weekly, was escorted from New Times' offices on Friday afternoon and made no comment.

His story, published in last week's issue, claimed that the NBC television network was about to announce that Brooks and Marris had been signed to host a new prime-time reality show produced by an amoral lowlife named Billy Slattery. The program, supposedly slated as a midseason replacement, was to be called Survive This!.

According to Oman's story, the show would have pitted teenage contestants against recently paroled predatory sex offenders, all of whom would be released in a remote and wild locale.

NBC, however, said that no such show is planned, and that Slattery does not exist.

Neither, it turns out, do the other so-called "experts" whom Oman quoted in his story.

"This is a dark day for New Times, and it puts a black eye on all of Los Angeles journalism," lamented NT editor Rick Barrs, who has helmed the feisty publication since its 1996 inception. "I can only extend my deepest apologies to the Peacock network, which I should have known would never stoop so low for ratings."

The story generated a large response, Barrs says. "The good news, however, is that many of our readers are highly educated, and detected Oman's fabrication. I just wish I hadn't been so easily duped."

Others weren't so quick on the uptake, however, and Barrs said he regretted any inconvenience this may have caused them.

Online gossip reporter Matt Drudge, for example, briefly included a link to the fallacious story on his Web site, drudgereport.com.

Drudge had e-mailed New Times the morning the story came out, Thursday, August 14, but received no response. A day later, Drudge prominently linked to the New Times story on his site, apparently too impatient to wait for a reply from the newspaper confirming the validity of the story.

Hollywood Reporter writer Scott Collins called that afternoon, just as Oman was being hustled out of New Times' spacious West Los Angeles offices. The savvy entertainment scribe said he'd seen through Oman's falsehoods after an extensive database search turned up none of the experts listed in the story. But he said other writers at the Reporter were convinced of the article's veracity and were busy hunting down leads about Survive This!.

Barrs expressed regret that other journalists, including a People magazine writer, felt compelled to call for more details on the story.

"I hate to waste their time. I know how valuable it is," Barrs said.

New Times also regrets the confusion it caused Alissa Chirchik, who described herself as a television industry employee. "I actually quite enjoyed your unbiased reporting," Chirchik wrote via e-mail, "but I am mainly writing to see if there are others out there as OUTRAGED at NBC as I am... Please respond with any information you have on other organizations that want to stop this program from ever seeing any air time."

Chirchik's search for compatriots, however, was not in vain. Jennifer Gottlieb, for one, also felt her pain, and sent New Times a cry for help. "Thank you for informing readers of NBC's plans for the new show Survive This!. I would like to write to NBC in protest of it," Gottlieb scribbled via e-mail. "I find it to be exploitative and sadistic. Can you e-mail me NBC's address and mention to which department I should send my letter?"

Celeste McCullough of Beverly Hills summed up the outrage many other readers felt. "I have never been so shocked and disgusted in my entire life," she wrote. "The way Bill Slattery goes on (very bluntly) about the show, it doesn't seem real. What intelligent person with any morals would come up with an idea to have convicted sex predators chasing women through the woods? Would he send his sister or mother on this show -- I doubt it. As far as the "fires down below' [a reference to Slattery's assertion that some sex offenders had been tamed from years of incarceration], they DON'T die out after sitting in prison, and ARE still the predators they once were. Get an education instead of producing sick TV shows. He is a filthy pig and perhaps should be castrated himself."

Barrs expressed regret that Slattery was not an actual person -- if for no other reason than for the producer to feel the full force of McCullough's eloquently penned wrath.

Other readers pleaded for evidence that Oman's story lacked truth. "If this story is true, this is the most repulsive, nauseating, disgusting bunch of putrefied offal I have ever read," wrote Jim Byers of Laguna Hills. "Before I go sending hate mail to NBC, I need to know if Billy Slattery is a real person, an actual producer for NBC. For the hope of mankind, I pray that he is not."

Mr. Byers, your prayer is answered.

Oman's story elicited a very different response from reader Tom Gibbons, who in a telephone call felt compelled to express his doubts not about Slattery and NBC, but about Brooks and Marris and their miraculous escape from convicted multiple felon Roy D. Ratliff.

"Their stories just don't add up," Gibbons told NT. The self-described "meddler" described his reasons for believing that Ratliff, who abducted and raped Brooks and Marris, had actually gotten a bum rap. Gibbons claimed that he'd seen enough to make it plain to him that Ratliff had been wrongly killed by sheriff's deputies, and was guilty of nothing more than consensual, if illegal, sex with a minor.

"Statuary rape," Gibbons called it, and asserted that Ratliff should not have been gunned down for it.

Gibbons may have a point. Surely, statuary rape would be its own penalty


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hoax; nbc; newtimes
Didn't know if this had been posted as yet. Credit again to most FReepers who almost instantly saw this as a hoax.
1 posted on 08/28/2002 1:31:22 PM PDT by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
It just keeps getting better, doesn't it?
2 posted on 08/28/2002 1:44:35 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
Today's hoax: tomorrow's reality?
3 posted on 08/28/2002 1:46:53 PM PDT by Loyalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tictoc; Physicist; StopDemocratsDotCom; SarahW; sinkspur; headsonpikes; RightOnline
This "feisty" rag is sure on a roll, no?

Survive This!

4 posted on 08/28/2002 1:51:04 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
It's not near as serious a matter, but over on alt.fan.tolkien/rec.arts.books.tolkien, a poster posted an account of a review of the LOTR I/ Fellowship of the Ring film. The reviewer not only reviewed the film, he did a comparision/contrast between the film and the book. That's not so bad-except he did NOT read the book, he skimmed an online summary of the book. And unfortunately for the reviewer , the summary he chose to utilize for the review was at a Tolkien satire site. It was very deadpan, and you'd have to read several sentences before you'd catch the parody. So the film critic has been revealed not only as a liar (he claimed to have read the book) but as a thief, who helped himself to another writer's online creation without permission or attribution. Obviously, that's not as horrible as a hoax that could seriously hurt two young girls, but it makes one wonder about the ethics some of our 'schools of journalism' are imparting.
5 posted on 08/28/2002 2:01:13 PM PDT by kaylar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
According to Oman's story, the show would have pitted teenage contestants against recently paroled predatory sex offenders, all of whom would be released in a remote and wild locale.

Darn. And I was so looking forward to the segment with the cheerleaders....


6 posted on 08/28/2002 2:03:35 PM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
See, that's the kind of problem when I read too fast. I thought the lead said, "New York Times," and I thought to myself, "they've never fired anyone for fabricating a story. Hell, if they did, they'd have no political writers." Then, I reread it and saw it was the "New Times."
7 posted on 08/28/2002 2:10:55 PM PDT by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
"Today's Hoax: tomorrow's reality?"

Nope. 'Today's hoax: tomorrow's 'history lesson'. ;^)
8 posted on 08/28/2002 2:16:09 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
New Times L.A. freelance writer Antoine Oman was fired last week for fabricating a story about teenage rape victims Tamara Brooks and Jackie Marris.

Aw, come on. That piece was hilarious.

9 posted on 08/28/2002 4:01:33 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
...unless, of course, "Antoine Oman" is a fabrication himself.
10 posted on 08/28/2002 4:40:04 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
Below is the photo they included with the article (caption: "Go, man: Oman gets the boot."). This article is as much a joke--I won't say hoax--as the original article. They are having way too much fun with this to let it go.

(Furthermore, the only two New Times articles that mention "Antoine Oman" is the original article and this one.)


11 posted on 08/28/2002 4:55:14 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
Oh, man.
12 posted on 08/28/2002 10:34:17 PM PDT by tictoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson