Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lack of outrage over desecration a sign of times
Boston Herald ^ | August 28, 2002 | Joe Fitzgerald

Posted on 08/28/2002 9:15:06 AM PDT by NYer

Dick Burchell spoke for many when he admitted, ``My senses have been dulled.''

A longtime reader, the 58-year-old New Hampshire Realtor called here yesterday to vent, acknowledging, ``I am not enamored by most of your columns on the Catholic Church.''

``You're not alone,'' he was assured.

The timing of his call was significant, coming in the throes of the vilest affront yet to Catholicism, that sexual tryst in the middle of a Mass at St. Patrick's Cathedral in New York, promoted by radio renegades and eagerly sponsored by Boston Beer baron Jim Koch.

We'll get to Burchell's reaction in a moment.

But what about Protestant, Jewish and Muslim leaders? What are their reactions? What's keeping them so tight-lipped?

Not that an extra dimension was needed to underscore the depravity of what took place, but it surely wasn't coincidental that it happened on Aug. 15, the Feast of the Assumption, one of six holy days of obligation in the Catholic Church, assuring the sacrilege would be witnessed by a maximum number of parishioners.

Do you suppose Koch, who bantered throughout the live broadcast, would have found it just as hilarious if those contestants had been encouraged to cavort in a synagogue on Yom Kippur, or in a black church on Martin Luther King Day?

Would that have amused him, too?

If not, why not?

When a temple is defaced, or an inner-city church damaged, or a mosque threatened, media and government waste no time professing indignation and demanding accountability.

Is what happened in the pews at St. Patrick's Cathedral any less intolerable?

Burchell, a father of five, the youngest of whom is serving with our armed forces in Afghanistan, remembers an earlier time in his life when he was more inclined to get involved, write letters, speak out.

``But then, I got away from theorizing,'' he said. ``I began to realize life was going by, that it was time to start accomplishing things for myself and my family, and if the rest of the world was going to hell in a handbasket, well, that was too bad, but I had to pursue my agenda.''

Lately, however, the news of the day has reawakened a restlessness that prompted him to call.

``For the first time in many years,'' he explained, ``I feel moved to put my pen on paper and express how I feel. I could fax those feelings to you in a tidy, time-efficient manner.''

``Forget the fax,'' he was told. ``Just talk.''

``Well, I despise popular culture. Take a look at any newsstand and you'll understand why. Our society is saturated with so much junk that it's almost hard to take personal offense anymore. It's not that I'm shrugging my shoulders; it's just that my senses have been dulled.

``So I see this thing that happened in New York as a logical extreme of where we're heading. Sure, I wonder what kind of people we're talking about here, but I also feel a lack of surprise. Do you know what I mean? I view it as more of the same.''

But this was not the same.

Indeed, this was the most brazen blasphemy yet, the ultimate display of contempt for Catholicism, and for what?

To sell more Sam Adams beer by drawing attention to the desecration of the pre-eminent church in New York.

At least Jim Koch had an excuse, albeit no defense; he's a bottom-line businessman who understands the Almighty Dollar has no conscience, that there's money to be made in vulgarity, especially in peddling it to a youthful audience.

There is, however, no excuse for the silence of those, especially leaders of other faiths, who should have been the quickest to condemn his venality as well as the abdication of responsibility by radio executives who looked the other way.

It's simple: There are times when neutrality is not an option, times when you're either part of the problem or you're part of the solution, and this is very definitely one of those times.

``I'm just a middle-of-the-road guy,'' Burchell said, ``living in a morally ambiguous world where there are many shades of gray. It isn't that I'm not indignant, but how do you change society? Where do you start?''

``You already have,'' he was told, ``just by making this call.''


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: catholic; media; scandal; stpats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last
Indeed, this was the most brazen blasphemy yet, the ultimate display of contempt for Catholicism, and for what?

It's open season on the catholic church and the media are savoring each and every story.

1 posted on 08/28/2002 9:15:07 AM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Siobhan; american colleen; sinkspur; livius; Lady In Blue; Salvation; Polycarp; narses; ...
There is, however, no excuse for the silence of those, especially leaders of other faiths, who should have been the quickest to condemn his venality as well as the abdication of responsibility by radio executives who looked the other way.

This proves my point.

2 posted on 08/28/2002 9:17:18 AM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
the vilest affront yet to Catholicism

Worse than the church's own sex scandals?
3 posted on 08/28/2002 9:24:52 AM PDT by Egregious Philbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer; Antoninus; sandyeggo; frogandtoad; saradippity; maryz; Jeff Chandler; ken5050; Slyfox; ...
Ping
4 posted on 08/28/2002 9:27:21 AM PDT by Siobhan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Seems to me there has been a total outrage over this. I don't know what he's so mad about. WNEW has been embarrassed, to the point of the radio guys being fired (and a syndicated show being pulled); plus wasn't the shameless, immoral couple arrested themselves?

Some leftys in New England aren't outraged, so what else is new?
5 posted on 08/28/2002 9:29:18 AM PDT by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
It's open season on the catholic church and the media are savoring each and every story.

Exactly. The Catholic Church is just the first though. The offensive views of being Pro Life, calling homosexuality a sin, and not ordaining women as well as being resistant to parishioner to clergy governance is unacceptable to the liberal media. Now that “Operation Trojan Horse” by the homosexuals has begun, there’s a crack in the armor. Time to attack!

Sadly, many Christians and Conservatives have seen this as a chance to pile on as well. Little do they realize, they’re next on the liberal’s agenda.

Owl_Eagle

”Guns Before Butter.”

6 posted on 08/28/2002 9:33:44 AM PDT by End Times Sentinel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Egregious Philbin
RIGHT! Worse than the scandal within the Church!

The lack of your own perspective in not seeing and understanding the difference lies within your own lack of understanding of the composition of Catholicism.

You fail to understand what makes up the statement that WE ARE THE CHURCH!

Those who were and are involved in the filthy scandals ... whether by active participation, protectionism or any other means by which the problem grew ... are a very miniscule portion of that composition.

We, the good priests, (which far outnumber the predators and their human shields;) WE, the Faithful laity ... are scandalized, vilified and scorned for our Faith.

This "salacious event" in St. Pat's is proof positive of some of the root causes of why the hierarchy behaved in many protective instances ... because people ... in many ways people, such as yourself, are standing there waiting to sling mud on each and every one of us for the sins of a few.

I make no excuses for the bad behavior of the few among us ... I despise the crass society that we daily allow to grow and to thrive!

Look to those "acceptable societal mores" which are a violation of natural law and inevitable God's Laws, and which dumb down the sensitivities of the general population in the name of an advancing culture ... for ALL of the major problems that man (and Christ's very Church) face today.
7 posted on 08/28/2002 9:49:09 AM PDT by AKA Elena
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Egregious Philbin
Worse than the church's own sex scandals?

Yawn, may those who eat your hypocritical tripe enjoy the seeds of liberal jihad in churches..... (hint: they would have never dared do that in mosque .... full of pedophiles)

8 posted on 08/28/2002 9:49:27 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise; AKA Elena
hypocritical tripe

Howso? The adjectives I would use to describe the radio stunt are many - gross, disrepectful, inconsiderate, ignorant, idiotic, obscene... But if you want something truly vile, I would point to Cardinal Law's covering up of the criminal acts of priests, and the church's continued failure to address these crimes with respect to their victims.

Making that distinction is not the same as slinging mud upon the whole church.
9 posted on 08/28/2002 10:02:03 AM PDT by Egregious Philbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
Yawn, may those who eat your hypocritical tripe enjoy the seeds of liberal jihad in churches...

No, the hypocrisy is the the way the Catholic Church chose to protect their pervert preists rather than those who put their faith in them. A couple of jerks screwing in a church won't damage the church. Hundreds of pedophile preists and the church's denial and protection of them has damaged them beyond anything the Catholic bashers ever could.

10 posted on 08/28/2002 10:46:21 AM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Egregious Philbin
The hypocrisy lays in that we let abortion clinics have the right to ban catholics who want to save babies, vilifying them, yet we all tend to take it mildly, that is, we require appologies from Catholics to protest when liberals crusade in our houses and churches with their fantasies. Enough is enough.
11 posted on 08/28/2002 10:46:27 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
A couple of jerks screwing in a church won't damage the church.

So a couple of perverts touting the benefits of having sex in your house despite your express rules against such behavior is OK? You guys are the freaking hypocrits.

As for the pedophile scandal, don't you think this radio show is actualy encouraging illicit sex? That's another hypocrisy, blaming the church, yet proselytising it into illicit sex.

Secondly the church is not going on the airwaves unappologeticaly preaching. Even if the church's contrition about the inquisition, crusades, treatment of Jews and pedophiles is too small according to some, at least it is not boasting pride in such perversion and abuse as these evil radio show people are doing.

If America want their bedrooms safe from commies, I suggest America to rething its consumerism gone so unappologetic we even let jihadesque radio hosts stream around their fantasies in churches.

12 posted on 08/28/2002 11:13:00 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Thanks for the ping. This act is another signpost on the road to Gomorrah –maybe the last. The good Lord has been very patient with us.
13 posted on 08/28/2002 11:55:56 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Egregious Philbin
And we (if you hadn't noticed) have been drug through the mud for months by the national liberal press JUST TO MAKE YOUR POINT .....

YOUR POINT HAS BEEN MADE.

The national liberal press corpse HAS emphasized the point endlessly, but also HAS deliberately PROTECTED the homesexual nature of these (very, very few) assaults by describing them as "assaults against children ... just like you have.

That 98% were done by homesexual priests against young men susceptible to homesexual presion is deliberately ignored by the media. The revulsion, hatred, and anger agsint the those sinners (criminals!) who did the acts is also IGNORED by the media.

The result?

Exactly what you did: Lump everybody together and assault the Catholic Church because of its stand against abortion (the "sacrament" of the liberals' religion, their most precious possesion: the right to kill an inconventent living person.)

In the meantime, what would you do if the national press paid somebody to slaughter a pig on Yom Kipper in the biggest NY Jewish tabernacle?

Think THAT would be ignored by your darling national press corpse?

Would that act be defended as "free speach" ... or would be publically funded "high advanced edge art" like a crucifix submerged in urine, or elephant dung on a painting of Mary, or the Pope shown defecating?

Oh yeah. Those already ARE defended by your liberal media as being "art" forms.
14 posted on 08/28/2002 11:56:42 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Egregious Philbin; Hugin
You guys are dead on. It's sickening that some people are more upset about some stupid Howard-Stern-wannabe stunt than they are about child abuse.
15 posted on 08/28/2002 12:07:26 PM PDT by Sloth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
I never mentioned abortion, homosexuality, Andres Serrano, or "my" liberal media. Please reread the comments I made!

Cheap blasphemy such as this stunt and the "art" you've mentioned doesn't compare to the crimes committed by a very few Catholic priests. I don't even think it compares to the crime of the church's inadequate response to those crimes. Are you saying that the media (and as this author says - clergy of other faiths!?) should somehow atone for the all the reports on the crimes by priests by presenting this anomaly of an event as somehow equivalent?
16 posted on 08/28/2002 12:14:24 PM PDT by Egregious Philbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
So a couple of perverts touting the benefits of having sex in your house despite your express rules against such behavior is OK?

Maybe you should read what I actually said. I never said that was OK. What I said was it won't do damage to the curch, whereas pedophille priests and the coverup by the bishops have done tremendous harm to both the church and those who put their faith in them.

Like I said, those guys ar a couple of jerks, but the church and their knee-jerk defenders need to get their priorities straight.

17 posted on 08/28/2002 12:47:59 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Egregious Philbin
Making that distinction is not the same as slinging mud upon the whole church.

I'm a devout Catholic, and I'm with you 100% on this. The sex act at St. Patrick's was disgusting and highly offensive. The homosexual teenage boy/priest rape scandal in the Church is just pure evil.

18 posted on 08/28/2002 12:54:47 PM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
You guys are dead on. It's sickening that some people are more upset about some stupid Howard-Stern-wannabe stunt than they are about child abuse.

You're right.

19 posted on 08/28/2002 12:55:57 PM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lainie
Seems to me there has been a total outrage over this.

Seems that way to me too, given that the protagonists were fired, their show cancelled, and the sponsor has had to issue a (rather inadequate, IMHO) public apology. It may be that the author wrote this before those events unfolded, or it may be that he finds it more convenient to pretend that there's been no outrage for some reason. But there certainly has.

20 posted on 08/28/2002 12:55:59 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson