Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Houston and DC are eliminated. Looks like it will be the Bay Area, the NYC proposal is just too expensive. NYC survived the cut due to the Carnahan factor.

Another feather in Lee P. Brown's cap, he's having a great month!

1 posted on 08/27/2002 2:30:20 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Diddle E. Squat
Might I just say, as a resident of NYS, that I don't want A DIME OF MY TAX MONEY going to this bloody boondoggle. Or to relieve the mountain of debt its going to leave behind. CA can have it. With my blessing. No offense to CA. I hope somebody files a lawsuit. Anyone in NYS who wants to try, in the event we're unfortunate enough to get this mess, count me in.
2 posted on 08/27/2002 2:33:23 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat
I think it'll be New York; the "Carnahan factor" will still be at work next year at this time.

Dallas actually thought it had a shot at this last year.

You're right about the Texas taxpayers. We dodged a bullet here.

3 posted on 08/27/2002 2:33:54 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Oh man...another reason to move from this city.
4 posted on 08/27/2002 2:35:24 PM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Excerpt from the Houston Chronicle story (note that it says that SF is in, then it says it is out):

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/topstory/1549585

Houston out of the running for 2012 Olympic games
Copyright 2002 Houston Chronicle


CHICAGO -CHICAGO -- Houston's dream of hosting the 2012 Olympic Games evaporated today when the U.S. Olympic Committee's site selection team eliminated it from the competition.

The task force announced this afternoon that it will submit San Francisco and New York to the USOC's board of directors for a final Nov. 3 vote to determine the United States' candidate for 2012.

Ten months ago, Houston's bid survived the cut from eight contenders to four, but the city's technically strong bid -- most of the facilities needed for the games are already here or under construction -- apparently couldn't compete with the international appeal of Houston's competitor cities. The other city that lost out, San Francisco, had proposed a venue that was more spread out than its rivals.

5 posted on 08/27/2002 2:36:22 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat
CHICAGO -- Houston's bid to host the 2012 Olympic Games was rejected today by the U.S. Olympic Committee's site selection team.

The USOC task force selected San Francisco and New York as finalists to become the U.S. bid city for 2012. The 123-member USOC board of directors will take a final vote Nov. 3 in Colorado Springs, Colo.

The International Olympic Committee will select the 2012 host city in 2005.

Houston and Washington, D.C., were eliminated from contention after a day-long meeting by the 10-member USOC task force, chaired by 1952 track gold medalist Charles H. Moore.

The decision to drop Houston from consideration ends a decade-long dream that began with former City Councilman John Kelley and was carried forward by the Houston 2012 Foundation. Foundation chairman George DeMontrond III and foundation president Susan Bandy were present for the announcement this afternoon.

The centerpiece of Houston's 2012 bid was Reliant Park, which would have hosted 13 Olympic events. Included in the plan was a $90 million proposal to convert the Astrodome into the world's first enclosed, full-scale track and field arena.


Now it's time to vote his thieving butt out of office and get all the do-nothing lackies off the city payroll.
6 posted on 08/27/2002 2:36:30 PM PDT by WilliamWallace1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat
I don't think any US city has a chance now - the Eurocrats will mobilize world opposition against us, particularly if we are rude enough to achieve military victories in the Middle East. That said, at least in the Bay Area the athletes wouldn't risk death from heat prostration. (Houston in September...what were they smoking???)
7 posted on 08/27/2002 2:38:47 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat
They smelled downtown Frisco and selected it anyway? What is their plan to get the homeless to stop pissing and defecating in the street?
14 posted on 08/27/2002 8:27:05 PM PDT by altair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat
I had to laugh at the news anchors here in Houston this afternoon, they were acting as if the city were in mourning over this. Houston is too hot and humid during the summer to host the Olympics. I had a hunch SF would make the cut, and personally, I would have chosen SF as well. I have never been there, but from what I've seen from tv, movies and books, it is a beautiful city. I would not have chosen Houston, NYC or Washington DC. Anyway, I'm especially glad that Houston didn't make the cut under Lee Period Brown's term, hehe.
18 posted on 08/27/2002 8:42:43 PM PDT by dougherty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Well, if they have it in San Francisco, I can only imagine what the opening ceremonies will be like. I foresee something on the order of a Gay Pride parade. You know the gay rights activists will insist on being part of the celebration.
20 posted on 08/27/2002 9:09:33 PM PDT by 3catsanadog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson