Posted on 08/27/2002 10:16:32 AM PDT by RCW2001
In my experiance, the liberals make no such distinction. If you disagree with things like sensitivity training, you're the ignorant, hate filled, toothless wonder. If you think that race based acceptance policies at universities are racist, you're the ignorant, hate filled, toothless wonder. If you hate everyone that is different from you and want to drive them all into the sea, you're....you guessed it, the ignorant, hate filled, toothless wonder.
There is no graduated scale here, if you disagree with their agenda, you're headed for this tired slander. Full stop.
Yet it amazes me to see the degree to which the fear of this stereo-type has poisoned our side. Even this esteemed forum gets whipped into a hate-hunting frezy at least twice a month, as we frantically scurry around trying to ferret out another "hater" and make our sacrifice to the liberal cartoon....
Oh great and powerful mis-characterization, please accept this sacrifice and see that we are worthy to be called "NOT-haters"...let your lies pass over us so that we be not branded the ignorant, hate-filled, toothless wonder....ooohm shaliooohm.
by denying this mechanism and participating in it's abuse, you offer obeisance to the liberal agenda.
...hopefully we can put all the Idaho/Alabama skin-heads and nazis and Aryan Nations' volk into one big pit in the ground, along with the Trotskyites, the Socialist Vanguards and the PETA-ites, and have them get into one massive pummeling fest until none of their respective species are left standing on this good, green earth......
And if you are a betting man, you'll probably find that the bookies are giving 5-1 odds in favor of the skinheads. Undernourished vegans, maggot infested homeless squatters and anarchists, and egghead leftists don't make very good street fighters. They only feel safe in attacking when they massively outnumber their opponents. Right-wing skinheads, on the other hand, actually have to work for a living.
A bunch of ARA (anti-racist action) fools in Maryland recently attacked a bunch of National Alliance members and innocent bystanders (because they all look alike, after all) at a bus stop and motel; not only did they try to beat people up, but they rushed into the motel throwing smoke bombs and generally behaving like the criminals that they are. As a result, most of the ARA in Maryland is behind bars or out on bail, facing assault, battery, and numerous other charges, including "hate crimes" charges. They are off the streets, but not, unfortunately, out of the gene pool. Having seen the species up close and personal, I can attest that your average street fighting leftist is every bit as stupid and ignorant as your average KKK loser. But guess which group gets the favorable media coverage?
Course, if they cancelled each other out nice and purdy like, well, that'd suit me just fine!
I don't bet, but figuratively speaking, yeah, I'd put in on the Nazi scumbags I guess.
Course, if they cancelled each other out nice and purdy like, well, that'd suit me just fine!
Since that is never going to happen, lets bring this discussion back closer to reality.
What group - radical leftists or radical rightists - is better represented in the media? Which group has actual access to influencial people? Which group has sympathizers within the ruling elites? Which group has an actual chance of influencing policies which effect you, personally? Which group is more likely to attack you, either directly, physically, or indirectly through politics? Which group serves as a front group for, or the "bad cop", to the "good cop", of mainstream ruling elites, to further the interests of these elites? Which group serves as the "bouncer" or the thuggish street enforcer, for the policies of these elites?
The answer to all these is: radical leftists. The radical right is irrelevent, and has been ever since conservatives accepted the double standard foisted on them by the left, that certain views, policies, ideas, positions, politics, etc., were beyond the pale of public debate. The right has been fighting with one hand tied behind its back ever since (at least since WWII, or the 1950's at the latest). The mainstream left can use extreme left nutballs as "useful tools" for all kinds of projects; the right no longer has such an option to use its own extreme right. Hence, post-WWII politics has been a leftward ratchet: our politics can move leftward, but never rightward; the most "conservatives" can ever do is slow the ratchet effect a bit.
And let's not fall for the canard that "nazis" are leftists because they are socialists - leaving aside that in pre-WWII Europe many conservatives advocated forms of socialism, the fact is that, today, very few extreme rightists of any kind advocate socialism. There are a few nazi purists today who do advocate socialism, but these are a tiny minority within a tiny minority. Your average extreme rightist today wants a smaller government; right wing socialism is a fossil from the pre-WWII era.
In any case, neither extreme right or extreme left are going away. It's time to dispense with the wish-fulfillment fantasies. A reassessment of political realities by conservatives would be a welcome thing, but I suspect it will not happen until we have a massive crisis of some kind. Until then conservatives will play at politics and live in fear of being tarred with the "extreme right" label(s).
There are probably NA members or supporters who are as crazy/dangerous as anyone in the KKK, but I'll wager that even an NA loon is smarter than anyone in the KKK.
BTW my grandfather was a member of the KKK back when it was cool to be so, but although he's still a racist, even he admits that the current KKK are nothing but a bunch of ignorant white trash losers.
Pre-WWII, the KKK represented entire white communities, and in fact represented a large segment of white America. As such it was not only representative, but effective (given the limitations of its rather anarchic and chaotic organization).
When southern whites backed away from any kind of violence, or activist politics to oppose "civil rights" in the 1960's, however, that was the effective end of any pretense that the KKK represented anyone but a few losers. Since then, the KKK has been toothless - which is fitting since some KKK members, in a fit of self-stereotyping, are also, literally, toothless.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. We need to be honest and acknowledge the fact that we all harbor a certain level of racial prejudice. To deny it is to deny the truth. With that said, I prefer to overlook a person's ignorance and much prefer to parlay on the level of personal honor and integrity. Heck, some of my best friends are white supremacists, and I'm black.
I think those two qualities are just about the best standard that can be used to determine a mans worth. I wish they counted for more these days. Too much effort is spent arguing over which pigeon hole we square pegs fit into and a great deal more effort is spent trying to stuff us in one, wether it fits or not.....
ok so how would I prove that ????
I don't have cable anymore and Howard has never been on the radio down here (I don't know how well something like that comes across on the radio).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.