Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Guns and 'Slander': Who is lying to whom?
Union Leader ^ | August 26 2002

Posted on 08/26/2002 2:47:48 AM PDT by 2Trievers

TWO YEARS AGO, "historian" Michael Bellesiles gained national fame for his book, "Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture," in which he posited that gun ownership in early America was rare and that there was no historical basis on which to claim that the Second Amendment protected individual rights to bear arms. His book won the Bancroft Award, the highest American award for a history book. Then objective reporters and historians began picking apart his book.

What they found was a mountain of lies. Bellesiles left out most historical evidence that contradicted his theory — evidence which greatly outweighed the evidence that backed up his theory. Furthermore, he misrepresented historical records and even claimed to have examined California records that do not exist — they were lost in the 1906 San Francisco earthquake. After a lot of these flaws and apparent fabrications were revealed, Bellesiles still managed to win a $30,000 grant of National Endowment for the Humanities money, funneled through the Newberry Library in Chicago.

In February, the William and Mary Quarterly devoted an issue to having "Arming America" reviewed by other professional historians. The verdict was not favorable. Bellisiles' professional reputation was so tarnished that in April his employer, Emory University, announced it would conduct an investigation. Bellesiles is now on paid leave while the probe into his "research" continues.

All the while, columnist Ann Coulter was working on her book "Slander: Liberal Lies About The American Right." Since its publication in July, the book has held the No. 1 spot on The New York Times' best-seller list. Coulter's premise is that the left-leaning media in America are dishonest in their coverage of conservatives. The number of documented errors in Coulter's book: two, and they were both minor, according to a recent story in The New York Observer.

While the disgraced, yet award-winning, Bellesiles is working on his taxpayer-funded next book, also about the history of guns in America, we wait to see how many grants and awards the factually accurate Ann Coulter wins.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; authors; credibility; michaelbellesiles
Ouch! &;-)
1 posted on 08/26/2002 2:47:49 AM PDT by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
Dear Professor Melton:
(History department chair at Emory)

Every time I see an article like this one:

Guns and 'Slander': Who is lying to whom?
http://www.unionleader.com/articles_show.html?article=13668

from the New Hampshire Union Leader, I am reminded of the glacial pace at which Emory is (not) dealing with a blatant case of academic deceit. I have been following this case for around two years, and am flabbergasted that you and your department still have not taken appropriate action to remove this scoundrel. Oh, well, at least you've suspended him.

Frankly, your credibility is right there with Enron executives, Arthur Anderson auditors, and Department of Education accountants.

Good day.

< FreedomPoster's real name>
< email addy>
< town, state, near Emory>

2 posted on 08/26/2002 3:27:35 AM PDT by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
They don't call it the "IVORY TOWERS" for no reason FP. &;-)
3 posted on 08/26/2002 3:34:39 AM PDT by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
The Coulter book has a LOT of material, pages of ideas, documentation and research from a variety of sources (mostly Nexus, I would guess). It is almost inevitable that there would be some errors . And Coulter has admitted were she was wrong.

Her critics used these minor mistakes as a way of discrediting the entire book. When they cannot argue the basic premise of what she wrote, the pick it apart based on a mistake or two.

Bellisiere's major concept was based on a purposeful, fraudulent distortion of much of the evidence.

I understand Emory University ,where he teaches, has placed him on 6 months administrative leave with pay. They have taken down his controversial material from the school's web site. It appears Emory hopes the criticism will now quiet down and the author would just go away.


4 posted on 08/26/2002 3:52:38 AM PDT by catonsville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
Excellent job, FP.
5 posted on 08/26/2002 4:34:23 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
Bellesiles is now on paid leave while the probe into his "research" continues.

Wow. Must be nice to be rewarded with a paid vacation just for tarnishing the reputation of your employer. Doesn't seem to work out here in the private sector, alas.

6 posted on 08/26/2002 4:53:14 AM PDT by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catonsville
My points exactly. Colter's premise is supported, and supported quite well.

I was going to buy "Slander" for one of my liberal freinds, but realized that her conceit was greater than her IQ. That creates a rationalization mechanism that will ultimately defeat all truth.
7 posted on 08/26/2002 4:59:11 AM PDT by gortklattu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gortklattu
I was going to buy "Slander" for one of my liberal freinds, but realized that her conceit was greater than her IQ

If she is a dedicated Liberal you have no shot because if they were able to think rationally and logically they would not be liberals to begin with.

If a person is a LIB by birth or background and hasn't really sat down and thought about things you have a chance
But for the dedicated ones Forget it
8 posted on 08/26/2002 5:19:10 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
There is a great article about Ann Coulter in today's Wall Street Journal.

I'm trying to find a link.
9 posted on 08/26/2002 5:38:56 AM PDT by gortklattu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
Bellesiles left out most historical evidence that contradicted his theory

Thomas Jefferson, by no means an imprecise thinker, was well aware of this consideration. In commenting upon how the Constitution should properly be read, he said: "On every question of construction let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning can be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one which was passed.”

10 posted on 08/26/2002 6:12:08 AM PDT by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
All the while, columnist Ann Coulter was working on her book "Slander: Liberal Lies About The American Right." Since its publication in July, the book has held the No. 1 spot on The New York Times' best-seller list. Coulter's premise is that the left-leaning media in America are dishonest in their coverage of conservatives.

Gee I wonder why this is?
< /sarcasm>

You would think that after all these years of the right shouting about the bias in the media and the loss of readers and viewers by the mainstream media they would get a clue.
You could think that...but you'd be wrong.

11 posted on 08/26/2002 7:04:35 AM PDT by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows
Oh but what did he know? He was just another dead white guy, and a slave owner to boot.
12 posted on 08/26/2002 7:06:34 AM PDT by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Needless to say, I didn't get a response to that one today.
13 posted on 08/26/2002 8:35:44 PM PDT by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
If Bellesiles had been an equally-young minority guy with a Ph.D. in a glutted field like history - but who made something not dear to the Left his academic specialty:

1) He'd never have gotten any beyond-academia mass-circulation book published.
2) No book he got published would ever have been reviewed in "mainstream" dailies.
3) He'd have had a damn hard time getting grant money - competing with the horde of others.
4) He'd have been fired or forced to quit instantly when he was caught falsifying research.

Scandals of antigun politicians and activists - including Bellesiles fraud!

14 posted on 08/26/2002 8:42:13 PM PDT by glc1173@aol.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson