[Valpal1]

The porn was not the motive, bvw, it was evidence of the the motive,-a sexual interest in children-

The kidnaping of children for sexual purposes, is the #1 reason for non-family abductions. So the motive is and was sexual and the porn was evidence of that sexual interest.

Why is that so hard to understand?

[bvw]

When was the last time Westerfield was reported to have viewed the porn? How many images were there that the Jury found of "child" porn? How much of the porn was adult, and how much and how often did Westerfield "use" it?

The men who kipnap kids for sex, what do their collections of porn look like? Were they similar to Westerfields in ratios? Did westerfield have other material besides CD's and zip disks that were pornographic? Which child-sex-abductors are there know that only have computer files?

Where is Westerfield's collection of momentos?

Where was the expert testimony that would have explained this?

Without that expert testimony to substantiate your claims, the Jury -- imo -- gave to much weight to and was poisoned by the porn and prejudice.