To: Valpal1
When was the last time Westerfield was reported to have viewed the porn? How many images were there that the Jury found of "child" porn? How much of the porn was adult, and how much and how often did Westerfield "use" it?
The men who kipnap kids for sex, what do their collections of porn look like? Were they similar to Westerfields in ratios? Did westerfield have other material besides CD's and zip disks that were pornographic? Which child-sex-abductors are there know that only have computer files?
Where is Westerfield's collection of momentos?
Where was the expert testimony that would have explained this?
Without that expert testimony to substantiate your claims, the Jury -- imo -- gave to much weight to and was poisoned by the porn and prejudice.
609 posted on
08/21/2002 2:08:17 PM PDT by
bvw
To: bvw
The jury saw the porn, all of it, and made their own conclusions. GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY.
They had access to the directory printouts, how much of what, where, etc. GUILTY.
bvw, he was convicted of possession of material depicting minors engaged in sexual activity. I guess the child porn really was porn, too bad.
612 posted on
08/21/2002 2:18:07 PM PDT by
Valpal1
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson