Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN chief claims US media 'censored' war
pressgazette.co.uk ^ | 8/15/02

Posted on 08/16/2002 11:16:51 AM PDT by GeneD

US news organisations “censored” their coverage of the US campaign in Afghanistan in order to be in step with public opinion in the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks, a CNN senior executive has claimed.

Coverage of the war in Afghanistan was shaped by the level of public support that existed for US action, Rena Golden, the executive vice-president and general manager of CNN International claimed.

Speaking at Newsworld Asia, a conference for news executives in Singapore, Golden said: “Anyone who claims the US media didn’t censor itself is kidding you. It wasn’t a matter of government pressure but a reluctance to criticise anything in a war that was obviously supported by the vast majority of the people.

“And this isn’t just a CNN issue -- every journalist who was in any way involved in 9/11 is partly responsible.” Senior figures from Afghanistan and Pakistan criticised Western news organisations which flooded the region with journalists, who were unfamiliar with its politics and history.

Major General Rashid Quereshi, chief media advisor to Pakistan’s president, General Pervez Musharraf, spoke during a debate on whether Western news coverage undermined the Government’s ability to balance its support for the anti-terror campaign and the hostility of its Muslim people.

He told delegates that at one stage there had been 3,500 foreign journalists in the country “many of whom knew nothing about the country or its problems”.

The presence of so many journalists caused “serious difficulties for a Government determined not to impose press restrictions on the media”, he claimed.

APTN chief Ian Ritchie agreed: “If journalists are to have objectivity, they first need to understand.”

CNN New Delhi chief Satinder Bindra also backed claims that by pushing “harder than they should for a story” some journalists endangered other colleagues in the field.

“One of many totally untrained journalists I encountered was determined to get closer to the front - close enough to see the Taliban frontline,” said Bindra. “I told him that if we could see the Taliban, they could see us, and they’d shoot us. For what purpose? There was no story, no good picture, but because this guy wanted to make a name for himself we all had to follow, just in case.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; aoltimewarner; cnn; cnninternational; renagolden; satinderbindra; selfcensorship

1 posted on 08/16/2002 11:16:51 AM PDT by GeneD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GeneD
It used to be called discretion.
2 posted on 08/16/2002 11:51:37 AM PDT by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
What a joke. And an even bigger one that these "journalists" actually seem to take themselves seriously.
3 posted on 08/16/2002 12:04:40 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
US news organisations “censored” their coverage of the US campaign in Afghanistan in order to be in step with public opinion in the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks

You mean the media acted like Patriots???? Go figure.

4 posted on 08/16/2002 12:06:31 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
I remember Satinder Bindra's reporting, he was good.

Of course, this is more leftwing nonsense that the Bush Administration is destroying civil liberties. Of course, these folks never said one word about the slaughter of the Branch Davidians or the people arrested, who criticized Bill Clinton, or that Clinton used the IRS to audit his political opponents. The lefties complaining about civil liberties has a long history, the commies were doing this going back to the 30's.

5 posted on 08/16/2002 12:37:16 PM PDT by Kermit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
US news organisations “censored” their coverage of the US campaign in Afghanistan

They always censor stuff, so what? CNN of all networks should know about self censorship. Hypocrites.

6 posted on 08/16/2002 1:52:05 PM PDT by Tom Bombadil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
“Anyone who claims the US media didn’t censor itself is kidding you.

Was this self-control during active war a good thing or a bad thing or just a thing? Are we supposed to think better or worse or not at all of CNN?

7 posted on 08/16/2002 1:56:10 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
You mean the media acted like Patriots???? Go figure.

And it sounds to me like Rena Golden, the executive vice-president and general manager of CNN International, was taking them to task for it.

"...every journalist who was in any way involved in 9/11 is partly responsible."

Interesting...

8 posted on 08/16/2002 1:59:14 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
No such self critisism was made when Clinton ordered the strikes in Yugoslavia
9 posted on 08/16/2002 3:07:45 PM PDT by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD; All
CNN Lies!


10 posted on 08/16/2002 3:31:22 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson