[Dead Corpse]

"A desperate attempt to ignore facts because they originate from a government agency, I.E. if the facts came from the government, they're suspect."

And on the other hand, the government has given us a lot if evidence to support the theory that they are, in general, a bunch of liars. Or do we need to re-hash Global Warming, "It's for the Children", "Reasonable Gun Control", "Read my lips, no new taxes", and "It depends on what the definition of the word 'is' is...". Those are just some small examples from those at the top of the heap. Imagine what their underlings can get away with.

exodus has some theories that are walking on EXTREMELY thin ice and possibly verging on the absurd. However, no one has ALL the facts yet and there is quite a bit of rhetoric flying around.

So far, it's looking REALLY bad for Mathews.

Just my 2 cents.

[tpaine]

--- on the other hand, the government has given us a lot if evidence to support the theory that they are, in general, a bunch of liars. Or do we need to re-hash Global Warming, "It's for the Children", "Reasonable Gun Control", "Read my lips, no new taxes", and "It depends on what the definition of the word 'is' is...". Those are just some small examples from those at the top of the heap. Imagine what their underlings can get away with.
_________________________________

Well said.

But, of course, having
'defended' oswald, - thus having unclean hands;
--- most PC people here at FR have given up on my opinions.

[Shooter 2.5]

The liar has already been told a dozen times already that the bullet came from Mathew's pistol. That and eyewitnesses plus the fact that even if it was friendly fire, Mathews is still responsible. After all of that, the liar still says that Mathews didn't kill Taylor.
It matches the phrase I coined. Oswald's Defense.
I have a very healthy distrust of any government because talk is cheap. No one can say that this was a case of friendly fire.

[tpaine]

"exodus has some theories that are walking on EXTREMELY thin ice and possibly verging on the absurd. However, no one has ALL the facts yet and there is quite a bit of rhetoric flying around."
_________________________________

Yes indeed, thin ice.
-- But some are calling him a liar for noting that the murder weapon has not been positivily established, thus leaving open the slim possibility of friendly fire.
-- Which of course, would NOT absolve him of responsibility for murder.
-- Charges of 'lying' though , at this stage, are indeed empty, overtblown rhetoric.