Making Colonies out of Nation-States

Will Americans ever escape the gag of political correctness? Probably not, but the English are making a last-ditch effort. On Aug. 7, the London Times published an article by one of its editors titled "Britain is Losing Britain."

Third World immigration, hitherto an unmentionable subject, is quadrupling the rate of Britain's population growth and creating a new city of immigrants the size of Cambridge every six months.

Immigration, the Times says, is transforming Britain into "a foreign land." British society is being utterly transformed "against the wishes of the majority of the population, damaging quality of life and social cohesion, exacerbating the housing crisis and congestion" and burdening the health service to the breaking point.

Finding the situation "so extreme and so damaging," the Times editor writes that "silence is no longer an option." Britain is literally disappearing. In many British cities, "you can wander around for hours without seeing a white face, one monoculture having replaced another." Yet "immigration celebrationists" continue "to brainwash the British public into thinking that it is all for their own good. But almost every reason given to support this immigration is bogus."

"In the past five years," the Times says, "while the white population grew by 1 percent, the Bangladeshi community grew by 30 percent, the black African population by 37 percent and the Pakistani community by 13 percent. ... Whole villages in Bangladesh have been transplanted to northern English towns."

The British political order has broken down. Polls show that without question, "the large majority of British people – including around half of ethnic minorities – think there is too much immigration." But public opinion is powerless: "No mainstream political party dare reflect public opinion." British politicians cower before the immigration lobby and fear being called racist, Nazi or xenophobic.

Name-calling aside, the Times says that massive immigration without assimilation leads to social fragmentation. More non-Britons wish to live in Britain than are consistent with the existence of Britain. "The people of Britain have a right to decide who can move here."

The Times assertion that the people of Britain – and not the immigration lobby – have the right to decide immigration policy is heresy to multiculturalists. But the very next day (before anyone could burn the heretic), the Daily Mail, Britain's largest-circulation newspaper, reprinted the Times article. Thus, debate has begun before hysterical "immigration celebrationists" can shout it down.

Sir Andrew Green, a career British diplomat, together with Oxford University demographer David Coleman, has formed a new organization, Migration Watch UK. These developments are shifting the burden of argument. Now immigration enthusiasts are on the hot seat. They must explain why they aren't racists for wishing to destroy Britain with massive Third World immigration.

Americans are losing their country, too, but Americans are not allowed to say so. Third World immigration to the United States is higher than to Britain. One in five of the U.S. population was born abroad or born of parents who were born abroad. This is a massive change from 1970, when new immigrants counted for only one in 20 U.S. births.

While the British worry about losing cities to Third World immigrants, the United States is losing entire states. Assimilation has broken down. In its place, Americans now endure Third World enclaves or colonies.

As the United States becomes a polyglot, how can it have any foreign policy? How much longer will the United States be able to conduct a pro-Israel foreign policy and plan invasions of Middle Eastern countries?

The outlines of U.S. domestic policy in the New Immigrationist State (NIS) are already apparent. The tax burdens on native-born whites will rise to meet the needs of the poor immigrants. The burden of the federal personal income tax rests on a narrow base of 35 million taxpayers who are, in effect, slaves of the state. The colonization of these taxpayers will intensify as millions of needy new immigrants enter the United States each year.

The United States, like Britain, faces extinction as a nation-state. Both countries are becoming colonies for a plethora of Third World cultures.

As one Briton put it, "We resisted Hitler in order to become a colony for Africa, Asia and the Middle East." The United States has done the British one better. We have become the world's colony.

Dr. Roberts' latest book, "The Tyranny of Good Intentions," has been published by Prima Publishers.

Just today, on television, I watched as two happy families were reunited with the missing children. One in Los Angeles, one in Abilene.

I was very happy that the children were recovered unharmed. However, the parents had to express their joy through a translator. Only the mother of the TX baby spoke any English.

"Immigration, the Times says, is transforming Britain into "a foreign land." British society is being utterly transformed "against the wishes of the majority of the population, damaging quality of life and social cohesion, exacerbating the housing crisis and congestion" and burdening the health service to the breaking point."

Sounds like the good ole USA, doesn't it?

Immigration, the Times says, is transforming Britain into "a foreign land."

Wrong. British liberalism has already transformed Britain into "a foreign land." Just look at the sorry condition of the Church of England and you'll see how the country has been destro.. rui.. transfor.. er, "enlightened." The effect of excessive immigration-sans-assimilation is merely the icing on the cake.

The mothers are illegal alien mexican nationals who had instant u.s. citizen babies? Great celebrate the colonization of the united states by mexican nationals.

While their immigration status was not brought up, with all the dramatic events of the kidnappings and recoveries, it was obvious that could not speak English.

The family of the four year old covered in Los Angeles, spoke only Spanish, and their translator said it would have helped, if the posters and stuff would have been in Spanish, as well as English. That four year old girl will be starting school soon. Do they learn English when they start school in California?

On the recovery of the one month old infant in TX, the father could not speak English. The mother spoke "some" English. But she drove a mini-van, and shopped at Wal-Mart.

He is what going to happen (it did happen in every other democratic country or country in transition to democracy with a very few exclusions), once the second largest tribe raises to about 30%-40% of population countries do split along the tribal lines.

One would ask why it did not happen in US already ? The answer is trivialy simple: so far the domineering tribe (WASPs) did a remarkable job of assimilating every other group on immigrants including most of the minorities. Naturally, domineering tribe had changed (including its name and means of identification) in the process too. It is a huge topic on its own, however, all we care about at the point is that as a result the US tribal landscape is dominated by a huge tribe called 'American Mainstream' aka 'Dead White Men Culture'. So, US did not break up along tribal lines (say German-Americans vs Irish-Americans) because real tribal line is 'American Mainstream' vs very few others. Sure, assimilation is a dirty word but let us face it, this what is keeping this country togther.

So, what will happen in the future is 100% depends upon whether or not Hispanic immigrants could be assimilated into the mainstream too. If it will happen there will be realtively few principal changes, if it wont happen country will fall apart along Spanich/English Language divide, whether it will be civil war, velvet divorce or something in between.

This is that simple, folks.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.