Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Page 1 editorial: Mr. Smith has gone Washington
Union Leader ^ | August 12 2002

Posted on 08/12/2002 3:28:41 AM PDT by 2Trievers

"This is not a party. Maybe it is a party in the sense of wearing hats and blowing whistles, but it is not a political party that means anything. . . ."

"The party, to put it bluntly, is hypocritical . . . It does not criticize the Republicans who are pro-choice. So why criticize Bill Clinton? . . . "

"It is true in both parties that the party platform is not worth the paper it is written on. That is why I am an Independent. That is why I am going to stay an Independent, whatever happens in the future. I am still the same formula. I am still Classic Coke."

— U.S. Sen. Bob Smith, in his 1999 "Decision of Conscience" speech in which he quit the Republican Party.

We don't fault Bob Smith for leaving the Republican Party. Nor do we fault him for returning. People are entitled to change their minds.

But Bob Smith didn't just change his mind. He changed his "formula." The Mr. Outsider whom New Hampshire conservatives elected to make change in Washington nearly 20 years ago has himself become a classic Mr. Insider.

The man who called Republicans hypocrites for not criticizing pro-choice members has now warmly welcomed the reelection endorsements of big-name, liberal pro-choicers.

The man who denounced expensive federal budgets now boasts that he can bring home the most bacon.

The man who claims to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with President Bush voted against Bush's energy-independence policy and is misrepresenting the environmental record of fellow Republican John E. Sununu.

The man who saw benefit in staying independent of the party, "whatever happens," changed his mind precisely when another Republican senator's death opened up the chairmanship of a powerful committee.

The man who once boasted of daring to back Ronald Reagan's primary challenge of an incumbent President now complains bitterly that a primary challenge to him endangers "his" party.

Bob Smith was right in much of what he said about party politics and hypocrisy. We wish he had meant it.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: bushadmin; independents; ment; nh; unionleaderendorse
What is it about the Beltway that changes these chameleonesque politicos? Grrrrrrrrr! &;-)
1 posted on 08/12/2002 3:28:41 AM PDT by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
They forgot to mention his liberal animal rights views, too. I'd rather my senator not be a best buddy of PETA.
2 posted on 08/12/2002 3:33:59 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
>>What is it about the Beltway that changes these chameleonesque politicos?<<

Most of them are weak narcissists to begin with.

But when they get there with plans to cut the government, they turn on the phones, open the mail, and for two or six years hear nothing but a sustained scream, GIMME! GIMME! GIMME!

We have met the problem, and he is us.

3 posted on 08/12/2002 3:43:52 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
The big problem is simple - Political office was designed and intended to be a temporary stop-off for otherwise productive, above average people. One was supposed to make the sausage for a while, and then return to private life for at least a while to see how it tastes. Career politicians don't do that.

A secondary problem is the elimination of the appointment of senators by the various state legistatures. Without a merit-based promotion system, there can be found very little merit. After all, today's US Senator isn't much more than a congressman with tenure.
4 posted on 08/12/2002 4:02:25 AM PDT by MortMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Gimmee, Gimmee, Gimmee!Eventually we will Get, Get it, Get it, in the form of an economic disaster and nation we don't want.
5 posted on 08/12/2002 4:02:44 AM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
Frank Capra's great and uplifting classic, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, stars Jimmy Stewart as the idealist who goes to the Senate and maintains his ideals. There never was, and never can be, a sequel intitled, Mr. Smith Serves His Fourth Term.

The simple truth is that all politicians tend to "go native," as it were. The disease of "Potomac Fever" is not new. Jay, Hamilton and Madison recognized in the Federalist more than two centuries ago, the tendency of elected officials to "transfer their allegiances" from the interests of the people back home, to the interests of the people and powers in the capitol. That is the very definition of Potomac Fever.

Politicians who do not occasionally go home and stay, do not occasionally "swim in the common sea," as John Adams wrote, become unfit to remain in office. In the case of this particular Mr. Smith from New Hampshire, the voters have got his number. John Sununu is going to beat him like a rented mule in the primary, and deservedly so.

Congressman Billybob

Click for latest book: "to Restore Trust in America"

6 posted on 08/12/2002 4:08:41 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MortMan
Perzactly ... and when you give it ANY thought ... your blood begins to boil! &;-)
7 posted on 08/12/2002 4:10:03 AM PDT by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
People who seek power are overwhelmingly likely to be people who value power over all other things. Friedrich Hayek delineated this in "Why The Worst Get On Top" in his classic The Road To Serfdom.

Nor was Hayek the first to notice: Listen to the words of Leo Tolstoy:

In order to obtain and hold power, a man must love it. Thus the effort to get it is not likely to be coupled with goodness, but with the opposite qualities of pride, cunning, and cruelty.

The last person to be trusted with power is the man who actively seeks it. Rather give the scepter to the man who has to be dragged into office kicking and screaming, and clamors his whole tenure long to be released from it.

Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit The Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com

8 posted on 08/12/2002 4:22:25 AM PDT by fporretto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fporretto
"People who seek power are overwhelmingly likely to be people who value power over all other things."

Power, Sex, Money and Fame explains a LOT of life's problems. &;-)

9 posted on 08/12/2002 5:13:53 AM PDT by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
I always worry about those claiming to be of conservative breeds helping out the Democrats directly or indirectly.
10 posted on 08/12/2002 5:35:12 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
Unfortunately the electorate/sheepole have VERY short memories! &;-)
11 posted on 08/12/2002 5:53:20 AM PDT by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
McQaid's second front page editorial in a short period of time. The prior one endorsed Humphrey. This one, while critical of Smith, endorses nobody. What is the point?
12 posted on 08/12/2002 6:22:29 AM PDT by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Didn't know this was written by McQaid ... how do you KNOW that? I presumed it came from the UL editor. &;-)
13 posted on 08/12/2002 6:41:42 AM PDT by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
[The Party] does not criticize the Republicans who are pro-choice. So why criticize Bill Clinton? . . . "

The inherent stupidity of that statement needs no comment. But here is one anyway--control of the Senate means conservative judicial nominees get confirmed.

14 posted on 08/12/2002 6:57:49 AM PDT by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: San Jacinto
The inherent stupidity of that statement needs no comment

That's our Bob Smith for ya!

15 posted on 08/12/2002 7:35:29 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
I don't know if you brought up Jefferson Smith in relation to Bob Smith with the knowledge that the latter thinks he's the former, or not, but it's disturbing to me that he does-- no, really, he does.

He recreated scenes from the movie the day he left the "party of party hats" and not much else, and quoted him in his speech like he quoted actual human beings and not figments of Frank Capra's imagination. When you add this to the fact that he thought he was a credible presidential candidate, voters truly wonder how firm a grasp he has on reality.

16 posted on 08/12/2002 7:40:39 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
Didn't know this was written by McQaid ... how do you KNOW that?

I read it in the paper! ;*) ....the real, actual newsprint paper. McQuaid infrequently will do a front page, signed editorial. The editorial page editorials are unsigned now.

17 posted on 08/12/2002 9:28:02 AM PDT by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Some of the editorials are soooooooooooo bad they SHOULD remain unsigned. Nackey must be turning in her grave at times! LOL &;-)
18 posted on 08/12/2002 8:00:56 PM PDT by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson