Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bob J
I missed the original thread, but it might be best not to discuss *anything* about a case that's under investigation.

It does sound like that now-banned freeper is setting up Jim Rob for a lawsuit and the less information posted the better.

44 posted on 08/10/2002 2:21:49 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Catspaw
It may not seem like it, but the information that Bob has provided is very generalized. There's nothing he provided that isn't very well known to the AFers. That's the shame of it all.
50 posted on 08/10/2002 2:25:35 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Catspaw
I agree and this is the direction the SC Chapter seems to be taking. My comments were resereved for what I believe to be commonly known facts on the general forum.
54 posted on 08/10/2002 2:27:02 PM PDT by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson