Replies

>> Will you check out post #4 by BillyBoy? Here we go again...its all of us Conservatives having doubts about Bush's policies in some areas who are now trying to bring down FR and ruin JR! Will you please do something about these people? I love FR but I am tired of being attacked just because I'm not a BOT <<

Interesting accusation because I did not mention Bush ONCE in post #4 or said in any way that Freepers had to support him. I did make an indirect reference to Buchanan in a later reply to DoughtyOne, where I clearly pointed out that I was NOT saying that Buchanan supporters were disruptors. Evidentially, he understands that and you don't

It's ironic that you accuse me of being a Bushbot when I just got flamed by a couple of hard-core Bush supporters a few days ago for saying I would probably vote for Tancredo in the 2004 primary if Bush keeps up his current immigration policy. Clearly you know nothing about my beliefs or my posts. (BTW, I'm a longtime freeper and supported Forbes during the 2000 primary-- not Bush!)

I am a Republican voter, apprently that offends you. I'm not a STRAIGHT ticket Republican voter, although certainly, I like to associate with other GOP voters on this forum. It's unfortunate you take that as an attack. I don't have a problem with most 3rd party folks on this forum-- let me state that for a third time on this thread since you didn't seem to notice the last two times.

On the other hand, when I see threads where so-called "conservatives" say they want Janet Reno to defeat Jeb Bush as Governor of Florida, I do have a problem with that. When I see "conservatives" attack Bush for being "a tool of big oil" (an accusation used BY liberals instead of an object to Bush for doing something liberal) I have a problem with that. When I see threads praising Robert Byrd, I have a problem with that. When I see threads trying to convince folks that Roy Barnes is a "consevative" Democrat (when everyone knows he's not) I have a problem with that. And when I see "conservatives" crusify Mark Easley for meeting regularlly with the NAACP-- and then those same "conservatives" PROMOTE an NAACP member in a mayoral race, I do have a problem with that. I find it pretty fishy that those so-called "consevatives" would hold these beliefs. Either they are incrediby detached from reality or they are liberal disruptors. So I suggest keeping an eye on them.

Oh, and your thread attacking me? I have a problem that. I'll state for the record that I don't believe you're a disruptor at all. More like a crybaby.

Sorry if I offended you or misunderstood what you are saying. However I'm not a cry baby, just a fed up Freeper...sick to death of being attacked by Bots on issues that they refuse to discuss because they consider it anti Bush. I think Bush should be questioned. When he out Democrats a Democrat, something smells. I supported him, I voted for him but I refuse to put blinders on. Buchanan is looking better and better...ditto Keyes. But to be put down because you think so is usually only done by a BOT. If you aren't then I apologize. I decided that I was NOT going to take it anymore. ITs gone on too long. I'll flag Jim everytime someone thinks an independent thinker should be banned and removed. If that in turn removes me, then fine. I love FR and admire JR. But I will not be called names by people who drink koolaid.