Skip to comments.
Hackers to Beijing: Have a Cow!(Encryption program is letting computer users get past the censors)
Business week online. ^
| 8/5/02
| Einhorn
Posted on 08/10/2002 11:28:45 AM PDT by Rebelbase
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:16:33 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
If a Chinese official had to come up with a list of his government's enemies overseas, a 51-year-old former journalist and ex-U.N. official in Toronto proudly admits he would be ranked near the top.
An active member of two computer hacking groups, the man, who goes by the alias Oxblood Ruffin, is leading an effort to help Chinese dissidents by providing them software that allows Internetusers to avoid Beijing's censors. Oxblood is a member of Cult of the Dead Cow, a hacker group that started in the mid-1980s. He is also active in a newer, related group, Hacktivismo, which last month released Camera/Shy, a free program that helps encrypt content on the Internet.
(Excerpt) Read more at businessweek.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: censorship; china; chinastuff; encryption; netcensors; nethackers
Hackers tend to be fairly libertarian-oriented people, into freedom and democracy, not too much government intrusion into their lives Unless they are 14 year old script kiddies.
1
posted on
08/10/2002 11:28:45 AM PDT
by
Rebelbase
To: Rebelbase
I hate to quote President Bush, because I'm not a fan of his, but like he said...you are either for democracy or against it. I don't think you can have it both ways. Great minds think alike.
To: *China stuff
To: conspiratoristo; hinckley buzzard; Las Vegas Dave
China Bump
4
posted on
08/10/2002 12:15:49 PM PDT
by
Pontiac
To: Rebelbase
I wonder how much the kiddy porn will use this tech? Perfect tools developed by a bunch of Libertarians.
5
posted on
08/10/2002 3:26:14 PM PDT
by
LowOiL
To: Rebelbase
"we will study ways and means of circumventing state-sponsored censorship of the Internet and will implement technologies to challenge information rights violations." Point for the libertarians.
6
posted on
08/10/2002 5:27:09 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: Lowelljr
How much kiddie porn used Kodak film?
7
posted on
08/10/2002 5:28:04 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: Tribune7
How much kiddie porn used Kodak film? Have you tried sending your film over the internet? (not suggesting your involvement with porn whatsoever). Would you recommend kiddie porn people develope their film at Walmart? You could of made a better statement if you said a Digital camera other than Kodak film. But the point of this article is how to send hidden photographs without being detected. Your point is mute.
8
posted on
08/10/2002 7:06:49 PM PDT
by
LowOiL
To: Lowelljr
Gun control advocates love to use that "if it saves one child...." bull$hit just as anti-kp people love to argue that "if banning any tool that could be used to help pedos escape capture stops one child from being molested it's worth it." Either way the tool is blamed for the actions of the perp.
9
posted on
08/11/2002 10:25:48 AM PDT
by
dheretic
To: Rebelbase
Someday they grow up and if they still value freedom likely would recognize who else values that and who doesn't too.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson