[Askel5]

Taken to its logical conclusion, indeed child porn and sexual activity with "consenting" children is acceptable.

See, the Interlock's criminal, pedophile pornographer Kinsey and the Supreme Court (who's okayed "faked" cyber child porn -- as if there's some substantive difference in the real ejaculations intended) for more.

[Spunky]

See, the Interlock's criminal, pedophile pornographer Kinsey and the Supreme Court (who's okayed "faked" cyber child porn -- as if there's some substantive difference in the real ejaculations intended) for more.

I wonder. Do they have "FAKE CHILDREN" to do their dirty deeds with, or do they use "REAL CHILDREN"

Ya! sure, Supreme Court. Fake cyber child porn doesn't hurt a child.