Posted on 08/08/2002 8:22:24 AM PDT by anymouse
The ultimate in miniaturization is the atom -- there are 10 million billion of them in a single grain of salt.
The scientist Richard Feynman suggested several decades ago that it would be possible to use single atoms to store bits of data. Researchers from the University of Wisconsin at Madison have taken a large step toward making the idea a reality with a prototype that uses single silicon atoms to represent the 1s and 0s of computing.
Practical atomic-scale memory would increase the amount of information that could be stored per square inch of recording material by several thousand times.
The researchers realized they had hit upon a mechanism for atomic memory when they discovered that scattering gold atoms on a silicon wafer caused the silicon atoms to assemble into tracks exactly five atoms wide. The pattern resembled the microstructure of a CD.
Making the tracks turned out to be relatively easy. "We can actually get atoms to assemble themselves... precisely, without any type of lithography," said Himpsel. "It is actually quite simple, and my graduate students make the surfaces routinely now," he said.
The breakthrough that made the prototype possible was working out a practical way to write data into the memory, Himpsel said. "In general, it is difficult to work with an individual atom in a controlled way, without affecting neighboring atoms," he said.
The researchers initially tried to write information to the memory by moving atoms along the tracks. "That works well at very low temperatures with loosely-bound atoms, but not at room temperature where we wanted the memory to operate," said Himpsel. Eventually, "instead of moving them, we [picked] up the atoms," using a scanning tunneling microscope, he said.
The researchers found that the optimum spacing for each bit is a four-atom section of track. This makes the bit spacing 1.5 nm along the tracks and 1.7 nanometers between tracks, which amounts to a data storage density of 250 trillion bits per square inch. This is equivalent to storing the contents of 7,800 DVDs in one square inch of material. A nanometer is one millionth of a millimeter.
The researchers formatted the memory by depositing extra silicon atoms onto the tracks to make every bit a 1, then wrote data by removing atoms to represent 0s.
To read the data, they scanned along the tracks looking for the presence or absence of the extra atoms.
The approach bridges two broad camps of work on data storage, said Himpsel. "One group of researchers manipulates atoms with great precision at very low temperature," he said. The other group improves existing memory devices, which use thousands of atoms per bit. "We attempt to bridge the gap between the two camps by sticking to the atomic density limit, but... obtaining realistic numbers for the ultimate performance limits of a memory, such as speed, error rate, and stability" at room temperature, he said.
The researcher's prototype resembles the way nature stores data in DNA, said Himpsel. The memory structure self-assembles into the tracks. In addition, "the density and readout speed of DNA [is] quite similar to our silicon memory," he said. While DNA uses 32 atoms to store one bit using one of four base molecules, the researcher's silicon memory uses 20 atoms including the atoms between the individual atoms that store the bits, said Himpsel.
The prototype is clever, said Phillip First, an associate professor of physics at the Georgia Institute of technology.
Writing atomic bits is impractically slow at present, but the work is a realistic analysis of bit stability, which is good, recording density, which is high, and readout speed, said First. It is "a very impressive demonstration of the practical limits of two-dimensional data storage using single-atom bits," he said.
Although the prototype is very slow at reading data compared with readout speeds of magnetic disks, the researcher's work shows that this can be improved, said First. The fundamental limit of readout speeds has to do with signal-to-noise ratio, and the researchers showed that this limit is substantially higher than the speed they were able to achieve with the current prototype. If the researcher's storage media were combined with microelectromechanical systems that allowed for parallel data readout from the memory, "the ultimate data rate could be comparable to magnetic disks," according to First.
The researchers intend to boost the readout speed next, said Himpsel. "An immediate next step is the use of fast scanning electronics to speed up the readout to its theoretical limit, which is 100,000 times faster than our simple electronics allowed," he said.
Because the readout speed decreases as the bit size gets smaller, when practical atomic storage devices are eventually made, scientists are likely to strike a balance between storage density and performance that falls short of the 20-atoms per bit density the researchers have proven is possible, said Himpsel. "Somewhere on the way to the atomic limit is an optimum combination of density and speed."
The researchers are also working on finding the optimum coding and signal filtering methods for the memory in order to cut down on the error rate, Himpsel said. Using more than a single atom per bit could also reduce error rates.
And the researchers eventually need to tackle the as yet unsolved problem of making the memory work outside of a vacuum, said Himpsel.
Although the research shows that it is possible to store bits of data in single atoms, there is a lot of work to be done before the technology could be made practical, said Himpsel. It will take "decades," he said. "I will be retired by the time we have atomic-scale memory in use."
This type of memory may eventually become useful for storing vast amounts of data, but because the stability of each bit of information depends on one or a few atoms, it likely to be used for applications where a small number of errors can be tolerated. "I would not want to trust my bank account to a memory where a single atom could wipe out my savings," said Himpsel. "However, for pattern recognition -- face or handwriting recognition -- it is not critical that all the pixels are stored perfectly," he said.
Himpsel's research colleagues were Roland Bennewitz of the University of Wisconsin at Madison and the University of Basel in Switzerland, and Jason Crain, Armen Kirakosian, Jia-Ling Lin, Jessica McChesney and Dmitri Petrovykh of the University of Wisconsin at Madison. They published the research in the July 4, 2002 issue of the journal Nanotechnology. The research was funded by the National Science Foundation.
In a related story, Microsoft released its latest version of MS Office. It comes on 7,800 DVDs.
classic!!!
In a related story, Microsoft released its latest version of MS Office. It comes on 7,800 DVDs.
Okay..now, CLASSIC!!!!
Free the USA -- thanks for the ping!
I'll ping the group!
OK, I've got to know what thread this was meant for...
I remember when IBM did that, it was *maybe* one decade ago.
It seems to me that just arranging atoms to spell a word may cool, but it's relatively useless.
To be able to direct atom arrangement so as to be able to make use of them for data storage and processing purposes is much higher accomplishment, one worthy of our attention and respect.
Duh.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.