Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

What's the deal here? I need some perceptions and opinions on this! Is So. Cal Edison gonna go down after all? Is GANG-GREEN gonna get Davis to buy SCE cheaper after it's bankrupt so's they can keep us humans offa the huge properties of SCE in the end?
1 posted on 08/07/2002 9:23:14 PM PDT by SierraWasp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; snopercod; Carry_Okie; Dog Gone; Robert357; Grampa Dave
One Pingy Dingy, Two Pingy Dingy...
2 posted on 08/07/2002 9:25:27 PM PDT by SierraWasp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
We should radiate Davis and use him for energy. For the first time he could become useful! LOL
5 posted on 08/07/2002 9:37:59 PM PDT by A CA Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
Hi Waspersin,

I'm in Utah right now. It's saner here (at least most of it).

Maybe Bray Dayfist wants to offer Bill Simon a good deal on some bonds?
7 posted on 08/07/2002 9:50:16 PM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
Reuters thinks that the word "impact" is a verb. It's really annoying to try to read an article written by an illiterate.
8 posted on 08/07/2002 9:51:59 PM PDT by Neanderthal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
Wednesday August 7, 6:06 pm Eastern Time, Reuters Company News

S&P cuts California power projects to junk status



LOS ANGELES, Aug 7 (Reuters) - Standard & Poor's on Wednesday cut the ratings of some power projects that supply Southern California Edison to "junk" status, citing uncertainty about the utility's own longer-term credit standing.

The rating agency noted improvements in the credit strength of the Rosemead, California-based utility, a unit of Edison International (NYSE:EIX - News), but said it was "still impossible to determine SCE's long-term credit-worthiness."

SCE, which a year ago was on the brink of bankruptcy, is currently rated BB by Standard and Poor's, a non-investment or junk rating. The projects were cut to BB from BBB-minus, the lowest investment grade.

"The projects really derive their credit from SCE," Standard and Poor's analyst Peter Rigby told Reuters, noting they rely heavily on the utility for capacity payments.

In March, Standard and Poor's raised the utility's corporate credit rating to BB from D after it paid $4.8 billion to creditors, clearing much of the debt it incurred at the height of the state's power crisis last year.

The downgrade impacted Edison Mission Energy Funding Corp., a finance vehicle for Edison Mission Energy's Big Four co-generation projects in California.

Edison Mission Energy (EME) is a merchant power plant owning unit of Edison International. The cut did not impact EME's main rating, which remained low investment grade.

"Edison Mission Energy Funding is an entity down the family tree from Edison Mission Energy. It is a one project company and nothing is triggered here by a drop to BB," Edison International Chief Financial Officer Ted Craver told Reuters.

Such a move could trigger the accelerated repayments of some company debt and force the company to post collateral on some trading positions.

Edison Mission Energy itself, however, continues to be rated BBB-minus, the lowest investment grade, S&P said.

In March, Standard and Poor's raised SCE's corporate credit rating to BB from D after it paid $4.8 billion to creditors, clearing much of the debt it incurred at the height of the state's power crisis last year.

OTHER PROJECTS CUT

Other projects that saw their ratings cut on Wednesday were Salton Sea Financing Corp. and FPL Energy Caithness Funding Corp., both of which supply power to SCE but are otherwise unaffiliated with Edison International.

Standard and Poor's noted in its statement that a deal struck between SCE and state regulators "removes the immediate but not the long-term threat of a bankruptcy filing."

The pact allows the utility to collect $3.6 billion in past power purchases costs from customers. It was initially forbidden from fully passing on those costs due to a price freeze imposed under California's power deregulation.

The company said earlier that as of June 30 it had collected $2.0 billion of the $3.6 billion.

Craver said Standard and Poor's concerns appeared related to the absence of clear rules about how the utility will recover its power purchase costs in the future.

"They are not as concerned about past under-recovery and more focused on the utility getting good rules relating to (future) procurement," he said.

The California Department of Water Resources currently buys power for the state's three investor owned utilities after skyrocketing prices in 2000 and early 2001 resulted in the state's largest utility, PG&E Corp. (NYSE:PCG - News) unit Pacific Gas & Electric filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

California wants its utilities to resume buying power for their customers when they regain credit-worthiness. The rules under which that would happen, however, are not yet agreed.

Craver said that if Calif. Gov. Gray Davis signs Assembly Bill 57, which has been passed by state lawmakers, "it would be constructive from a credit standpoint."

The bill deals with the rules under which the utilities would return to buying power. A key feature is the elimination of "after-the-fact" reasonableness reviews and mechanisms that seek to ensure the "timely" recovery of utility costs through customer rates.

Edison International shares closed up 12 cents or one percent at $11.90 on the New York Stock Exchange on Wednesday.

10 posted on 08/07/2002 10:01:17 PM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp; Dog Gone; Ernest_at_the_Beach; RonDog; ElkGroveDan; NormsRevenge; Shermy
I'm waiting for S&P to rate all Kalifornia Bonds to pay for Electricity used by whining and free loading socialists/communists last year as a Zulu ranking or a Zero. Of course those whining and free loading socialists/communists are the bulk of the sheeple who vote for the Rats in every Kali election at least twice.

Then, the most crooked Rat in politics today will force his pet lap dog, Cal Pers to buy up these bonds.

Notice we haven't heard a single word about these upcoming porking junkers in weeks.

The un noticed kiss of death for bad bonds either Edison or Kali came out last month. These are the 4 efunds of bonds that are sold on the stock exchange like stocks. (SHY, ITF, TLT and LQD by Goldman Sachs, the latter for the top corporate bonds. If you ain't in LQD, your bonds be junk.

With all that has happened on Wall Street re exposure of Rat practices and Arthur Andersen accounting, these funds represent the beginning of the end of the Wizards of Oz, the bond guys, playing games behind the screen with funds. Transparency instead of the bond mumble jumble will start to take over. The mumble jumble artists will go to jail and help clean Martha's pans and pots if they try to present an Edison bond or a Kali bond as a good deal in the new market.
11 posted on 08/07/2002 10:15:13 PM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp; Grampa Dave
Using nouns as adjectives--

'GRAVE' Davis buries California.

15 posted on 08/08/2002 6:56:05 AM PDT by d14truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SierraWasp
This actually may not be good news. When Michael Milken got ahold of it, MCI had "junk" status and several Argintinian bonds had "AAA" status. The term is meaningless, as the market usually heavily weights itself to EXISTING companies as opposed to dynamic start-ups. But in CA's case, the rating is probably accurate.
17 posted on 08/08/2002 8:28:22 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson