Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CSPI: NASCAR, anti-drug PSAs don’t mix
Broadcasting and Cable.com ^ | 8/7/02 | John Eggerton

Posted on 08/07/2002 12:26:06 PM PDT by GeneD

The Center for Science in the Public Interest has sent a letter to the head of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, with copies to CSPI’s friends in Congress, complaining that NASCAR and anti-drug public service announcements don’t mix.

CSPI singled out the use of driver Jimmy Spencer in PSA’s, since he is sponsored by Anheuser-Busch. But it also referred to NASCAR’s "nonstop" reminders of drinking: "Beer brand logos are omnipresent on NASCAR’s drivers’ uniforms, cars, infield equipment and kid-friendly promotional items," CSPI’s Alcohol Policies Project Director George Hacker wrote.

Calling beer the "major drug problem" for young people, CSIP asked ONDCP Director John Walters to reevaluate the NASCAR partnership and to include anti-alcohol messages among those supported by the Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign. That campaign buys PSA’s on major media with the stipulation that those media match that time with their own anti-drug messages.

Among the representatives receiving the letter were Virginia Republican Frank Wolf and California Democrat Lucille Roybal-Allard, who, along with CSPI and Mothers Against Drunk Driving, are trying to drum up support for a hearing in Energy & Commerce on alcohol marketing to young people.

ONDCP spokesman Tom Riley responds that 'if you want to reach young people effectively, NASCAR is a good medium.' The administration thinking, says one source, is that NASCAR is essentially an advertising vehicle (literally and figuratively) and that not to use it because it also advertises beer would be like not putting PSA’s in NFL games because they are also a major vehicle for beer ads.

Riley also says ONDCP’s anti-drug media campaign does include "millions of dollars" worth of PSA’s decrying underage drinking, and that it is an issue that Drug Czar John Walters is concerned about and plans to address more specifically. How much money he will have to do so remains to be seen. ONDCP’s funding has yet to be set for 2003. Currently the House markup has a figure of $170 million, down $10 million. The Senate version would cut funding almost in half -- to $100 million -- while the administration is still pushing for full funding at $180 million.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anheuserbusch; drugczar; frankwolf; jimmyspencer; johnwalters; nascar

1 posted on 08/07/2002 12:26:07 PM PDT by GeneD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GeneD
A bit of elitist snobbery.

Maybe if NASCAR had an imported luxury car class?
2 posted on 08/07/2002 12:28:45 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD; Wolfie; headsonpikes; JediGirl; WyldKard; WindMinstrel; EBUCK; general_re; Xenalyte
ONDCP spokesman Tom Riley responds that 'if you want to reach young people effectively, NASCAR is a good medium.' The administration thinking, says one source, is that NASCAR is essentially an advertising vehicle (literally and figuratively) and that not to use it because it also advertises beer would be like not putting PSA’s in NFL games because they are also a major vehicle for beer ads.

Anyone care to point out the flaw in that logic?

3 posted on 08/07/2002 12:33:11 PM PDT by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Right. As long as that beer commercial comes on the television, I will never want to drink alcohol again.
4 posted on 08/07/2002 12:36:28 PM PDT by JediGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Last I checked alcohol beverages were still legal to drink for those over 12. Also can anyone imagine driving at NASCAR speeds while drunk? Personal responsibility is appitimized by the life and death judgement skills of a NASCAR driver. These nanny state elitists need to get a life.
5 posted on 08/07/2002 12:37:01 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
"Last I checked alcohol beverages were still legal to drink for those over 12."

Over 12? When did that happen? That would have made high school tolerable.
6 posted on 08/07/2002 12:41:28 PM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: norton
Maybe if NASCAR had an imported luxury car class?

10-4! Don't think it's worth doing if only plain-ol' "domestic" cars (and common people) are involved. Absolutely a snob-factor at work.

7 posted on 08/07/2002 12:42:09 PM PDT by toddst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
It might help if they had their facts correct.

Jimmy Spencer is sponsored by Target Stores, not a beer company.

8 posted on 08/07/2002 12:46:52 PM PDT by Don Munn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
CSPI singled out the use of driver Jimmy Spencer in PSA’s, since he is sponsored by Anheuser-Busch.

Beer companies are funny, in a capitalistic kind of way. They pretty much say, "Don't do those drugs....because you might not want to do our drugs too".

9 posted on 08/07/2002 12:49:11 PM PDT by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dakmar
Uh, I can't find it, I'm to damn high on legal drugs to spot it....LOL

EBUCK

10 posted on 08/07/2002 12:51:46 PM PDT by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Don Munn
This story does seem to be a rewrite of CSPI's press release, and God knows those pills have a hotline to every American newsroom, but it did include this photo from Jimmy Spencer's Web site.
11 posted on 08/07/2002 12:57:27 PM PDT by GeneD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Jimmy was in the yellow freight sponsored car. In the NASCAR Busch series. Hence the busch beer in the foreground. In the Nascar Winston Cup series, Jimmy is sponsored by Target.
12 posted on 08/07/2002 1:04:23 PM PDT by mn_b_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mn_b_one; Don Munn
Thanks for the clarifications.
13 posted on 08/07/2002 1:09:53 PM PDT by GeneD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
Damn, must have been drunk when I typed that. :) Should have read 21. Dyslexic fingers. Not safe for me to drive in NASCAR either. :)
14 posted on 08/07/2002 1:30:15 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GeneD
Calling beer the "major drug problem" for young people
Prohibition for alcohol again? Budweisers and rum and cokes on Schedule 1 along with green buds and nose candy? Why not? It worked so well the first time around.
15 posted on 08/07/2002 2:27:50 PM PDT by RANDomScout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson