Posted on 08/06/2002 1:47:27 PM PDT by WindMinstrel
Suppose you buy a mosquito trap and find, after using it for a few months, that there are just as many mosquitoes in your yard as before, if not more. You complain to the manufacturer, which says it now has a new model that works much better. You try it, but its no more effective than the first one. Then you read in Consumer Reports that the company never tested the trap and has no evidence that it works. Livid, you call the manufacturer again, and youre told the bad reviews apply to products it no longer makes. It is now developing a new mosquito trap that no one has tested yet.
This is essentially the strategy that DARE, the countrys leading drug education program, has successfully used to stay in business for nearly two decades. One study after another has found that students who complete DARE (a.k.a. Drug Abuse Resistance Education) are just as likely to use drugs as students who dont. Yet DARE claims it is constantly revising its curriculum, so any research indicating that it doesnt work is immediately outdated. And with a few exceptions, school districts--four-fifths of which use the program--always seem willing to give DARE another chance.
A study in the latest issue of the journal Health Education Research concludes that many schools use heavily marketed curricula that have not been evaluated, have been evaluated inadequately or have been shown to be ineffective in reducing substance abuse. The lead researcher, Denise Hallfors of the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, does not mince words in her evaluation of DARE. Theres no scientific rationale whatsoever for maintaining DARE in the schools, she says.
But such criticism does not faze DARE. The organizations executive director, Charlie Parsons, told the Associated Press the research cited by skeptics refers to DAREs old curriculum, which is no longer used.
The authors of a 1999 study anticipated this new and improved argument. After following DARE participants for 10 years, they found that in no case did the DARE group have a more successful outcome than the comparison group. Noting that DAREs defenders may argue that we have evaluated an out-of-date version of the program, they wrote, We believe that any changes in DARE have been more cosmetic than substantive, but this is difficult to evaluate until DARE America shares the current content of the curriculum with the broader prevention community.
Never mind. Two years later, DARE unveiled an even newer curriculum that supposedly addressed the weaknesses it had always denied. Now A.P. reports that DARE America is conducting a five-year study to evaluate the new approach. Whatever the outcome, you can be sure there will be yet another curriculum waiting in the wings.
DARE to Keep Cops of Donuts
(Donut Abuse and Rotundity Elimination)
So PIRE challenges DARE, and DARE refutes PIRE, and plans to do a 5 year study to prove that DARE is right and PIRE is wrong...
I say they can both ESABATM.
FMCDH
As one of the few (I imagine) elected Freepers, I am happy to report that I led the effort on our city council to end our city's contribution to the school run DARE program.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
FMCDH
FMCDH
Ha ha! I suspect the popular DARE bumper sticker has more to do with people trying to make a good impression to get out of traffic tickets. It's usually placed on the left bumper where an approaching cop might see it. Cops probably just get annoyed.
Hm. Sounds like my adventures with the many flavors of "Windows."
OH, and vis-a-vis DARE: Just follow the money. Matthew Lesko isn't the only guy who's figure out how to get "millions!" from the government.
My kids say it stands for "Drugs are Really Excellent". They got the idea from the multiple choice test at the end of the curriculum in 7th grade, where that was one of the options in the question of what DARE stood for.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.