Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To suggest otherwise is considered hateful and homophobic. But the facts paint a dark picture of homosexuality much different from the clean, harmless image most people see in the positive portrayals of homosexuals on television and in movies. The silence of the media has hidden the seedy, dangerous and disgusting behavior typical of homosexuals which would stagger the minds of decent people.
1 posted on 08/04/2002 1:00:32 PM PDT by TonyTheTigger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TonyTheTigger
Great article!
2 posted on 08/04/2002 1:16:28 PM PDT by shiva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyTheTigger
…which would stagger the minds of decent people.

Seeing that it is a slow news day, I’ll play.

The anti-everything nanny league that pontificates here at FR likes to tack this little caveat on everything they disapprove of. Although the line is mostly used by the WOD Nazis in reference to pot smokers, what is your point?

3 posted on 08/04/2002 1:21:35 PM PDT by TightSqueeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyTheTigger
This guy should be convinced to write a more 'secular' version of this article, so the major/local/national newspapers would be more likely to run it. This message needs to be sent to as many people as possible!

How can less than 5 percent, as the author claims, have such a grip on our country?

6 posted on 08/04/2002 1:36:50 PM PDT by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyTheTigger
I have doubts about these statistics cited in this article:

The median age of lesbians at death is forty-five compared to seventy-nine for married women, and seventy-one for unmarried women generally. The International Journal of Epidemiology reported on a study “to assess how HIV infection and AIDS impacts on mortality rates for gay and bisexual men.”

Why do lesbians supposedly die so young? Is it because they are having unprotected anal sex with HIV-positive gay men?

I think not.

10 posted on 08/04/2002 1:42:45 PM PDT by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyTheTigger
A 1981 study revealed that only 2 percent of homosexuals were monogamous or semi-monogamous-generously defined as ten or fewer lifetime partners.

"Generously" is quite an understatement! I wonder what the percentage of homosexuals who were truly monogamous could be...

11 posted on 08/04/2002 1:43:11 PM PDT by Smile-n-Win
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyTheTigger
TonyTheTigger,

An otherwise decent article is spoiled by hideous (and I do mean hideous) web page design.

If you intend folks to read your articles, do try to place text on a background that provides HIGH CONTRAST for the letters.

Here's a simple test, which of the following lines are easy to read, and which are harder:

Line 1: Standard Black on White
Line 2: Inverse White on Black
Line 3: Black on Blue
Line 4: Black on Cyan
Line 5: Black on Green

It gets even worse if the background is some detailed pattern.  Your stuff will be read by more folks, with greater interest and comprehension, if they are not struggling just to see the words.

 

13 posted on 08/04/2002 1:45:09 PM PDT by Rebel_Ace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyTheTigger
Some 95% of the woe in this world is self-induced. Homosexuality is a choice, and as such is not much different than choosing to be, say, a Democrat. A choice made on limited information, and with the assistance of persons who have an agenda, but hey, if you have a low self-esteem to begin with, of course you don't trust your own reasoning processes. Worthless people make worthless decisions because they think worthless thoughts.
14 posted on 08/04/2002 1:45:50 PM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyTheTigger
Since heterosexuals are in the majority we will set the standards.Homos are "heterophobic"!
16 posted on 08/04/2002 1:55:39 PM PDT by INSENSITIVE GUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyTheTigger
I especially agree with the article's questioning the too often propaganized notion that AIDS is "everyones" disease. Clearly not everyone is at significant risk.

For example, 85 year old nuns living in a convent are not candidates for AIDS and neither are heterosexual couples living in a faithful monogamous relationship who were not in promiscuous relationships before marriage.

Let's face it if everyone held to traditional moral values, AIDS wouldn't be much of a problem.

PS Ditto on the background of the web site being too busy. Search out a copy of The HTML Web Classroom by Paul Meyer for a great introduction to HTML and basic web design.

18 posted on 08/04/2002 2:04:56 PM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyTheTigger
Bless you Tony. Thank you for your help.
24 posted on 08/04/2002 2:21:18 PM PDT by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyTheTigger
Homosexual can do whatever depraved things they want in their bedrooms and bathhouses. Just keep their influence away from my kids and my family.
29 posted on 08/04/2002 2:28:20 PM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyTheTigger
Human male sexuality is wild by nature and essentially unrestrained when engaged in concert with other males. This makes particularly male homosexuality ultimately destructive to a society based on the Judeo-Christian ethic where heterosexual marriage otherwise constrains the savage male nature, instead facilitating the channeling of some of its energy into society building endeavors.

This is the philosophy essentially elucidated by Dennis Prager who convincingly argues that when early Judaism insisted that male sexuality be directed into marriage, it effectively changed the world.

It also forms a basis of reason for why heterosexual prostitution should remain illegal and something to be spurned.

36 posted on 08/04/2002 2:43:06 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyTheTigger
Belated Bump
41 posted on 08/06/2002 7:06:47 AM PDT by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TonyTheTigger
Look at this site. http//www.itsnotgay.com
49 posted on 10/07/2002 7:48:18 AM PDT by wjcsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson