Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Stockpiles Oil To Avoid Price Shock
The Guardian ^ | 8-3-2002 | Julian Borger

Posted on 08/02/2002 7:19:37 PM PDT by blam

US stockpiles oil to avoid price shock

Bush learns a lesson from slump after first Gulf conflict

Julian Borger, Washington
Saturday August 3, 2002
The Guardian

Beneath the gently curving coastline of Texas and Louisiana, vast underground caverns are being filled with crude oil as part of Washington's war preparations that could be as important as the Pentagon's military blueprints. The caverns were once subterranean pillars of salt, but the salt has been dissolved and sucked out, leaving gigantic sealed reservoirs which for the past quarter century have served as the US strategic petroleum reserve (SPR). Last November, when the Bush administration began to think about extending its "war on terror" from Afghanistan to Iraq, the president ordered the reserve to be filled to its 700 million barrel capacity.

This vast tank is intended to insulate the country, and the world economy, from oil price shocks of the sort experienced during the Gulf war in 1991. The ensuing slump cost the first President Bush his job.

Since the presidential directive in November, crude oil is being poured into the caverns at the rate of 150,000 barrels a day. According to a US energy department schedule, it will continue filling up at that rate for the rest of the year.

Adam Sieminski, an oil analyst at Deutsche Bank in London, said that US purchases for the SPR have accounted for half the total increase in demand for oil around the world this year, helping to buoy the oil price up at $25 a barrel.

The big question is whether the SPR can prevent the oil price shooting up to $50 or $60 in the event of a Gulf war, and reversing the US economy's faltering recovery.

That recovery is arguably already endangered by the US government's return to deficit spending largely as a result of its $355bn (about £227bn) defence budget for 2003, approved by the Senate this week. That would be further bloated by contingency spending on a war. The Gulf war cost about $80bn in today's dollars but 80% of that was paid for by US allies. This time, no one else is going to foot the bill.

The defence deficit will put upward pressure on inflation and interest rates, but its impact could be dwarfed by a serious oil shock. The likelihood of that will depend on the success and speed of a US invasion.

If Saddam Hussein is toppled in a speedy strike, the only physical impact on the market would be a temporary interruption in Iraq's one million barrels a day supply under the UN oil for food programme, which could be easily compensated for by drawing down the US reserve, which can supply over four million barrels a day for three months.

President Bush's father also turned to the SPR to mitigate the impact of the Gulf war, but many analysts believe he left it too late, announcing his intentions in January 1991, at the start of the coalition air campaign but several months after the invasion of Kuwait. The oil market got jittery and the price per barrel rose temporarily to $40. Most observers say the current administration will signal its intention to draw down the SPR ahead of any military action.

Richard Cooper, a former CIA analyst who is now a Harvard economics professor, said the US might not even have to use much of its reserves.

"World demand is weak at the moment, and there's a lot of excess capacity, particularly in Saudi Arabia, but also in other countries. And I think that any shortfall from Iraq would, in relatively quick order, be made up by production elsewhere," he said.

However, Saddam could strike at other oilfields, terminals or tankers in the Gulf. Conceivably, he could block Saudi Arabia's exports of eight million barrels a day.

With that in mind, Mr Sieminski said, the US has sounded out the Germans and Japanese about using their reserves in coordination with the SPR. Together, they could pump nine million barrels of oil a day on to the world market, at least for a month.

However, there was an even worse "nightmare scenario". A prolonged conflict could trigger serious unrest across the Gulf and ultimately bring down pro-western regimes such as the Saudi royal family. (We can hope)

The emergence of a hardline Islamic state and the long-term interruption of Saudi oil, representing nearly a third of the world's known reserves, could send the energy market into a panic.

"In that case, you'd have very expensive oil, and the world economy would be in a lot of trouble," Mr Sieminski said.


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: energylist; oil; price; shock; stockpiles; us

1 posted on 08/02/2002 7:19:37 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
". A prolonged conflict could trigger serious unrest across the Gulf and ultimately bring down pro-western regimes such as the Saudi royal family.

The best idea I've heard so far is that Jordan would be allowed to control the Holy Cities and the U.S. would administer the oil fields.

2 posted on 08/02/2002 7:22:54 PM PDT by crypt2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Energy_List; Grampa Dave; Tumbleweed_Connection; Liz; Free the USA; Dog Gone; ...
Ping.
3 posted on 08/02/2002 7:32:23 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: crypt2k
Be careful what you wish for........remember what happened to Iran when Jimmy Carter did in the Shah.
4 posted on 08/02/2002 7:35:34 PM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
Russia has already delivered a tanker of oil to Texas. This isn't a terribly efficient route for oil, but it is an important symbol.
Russia can cover a lot of an oil shortfall from the mid-East, and this proves they can do it.

Not to mention that they can use the money.

5 posted on 08/02/2002 7:36:34 PM PDT by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crypt2k
wasn't it clinton who depleted the spr in the late 1990s? i seem to recall he had some difficulty taking the political heat when gasoline jumped from about 79 cents a gallon to about 1.02 a gallon.

speaking of democrats, er i mean socialists, if anwar was open, this would not be a news item. if you think about it, the socialist agenda of the democrats has hamstrung our current administration in waging war. i have to admire bush for carefully maneuvering around several socialist icebergs before we strike...

6 posted on 08/02/2002 7:36:42 PM PDT by mlocher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: speekinout
your observation is correct. the lone tanker to texas is more symbolic than anything at this point. the russian oil infrastructure is in major disrepair and needs investment capital. but in a few years they will be a major source of petrol. too bad anwar aint open.
7 posted on 08/02/2002 7:38:14 PM PDT by mlocher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam

At this rate the SPR will filled to capacity in something over a two years.... The SPR has a capacity of about 700 million barrels and stands at 578.4 million now.


Strategic Petroleum Reserve Inventory for August 02, 2002

      

Current Inventory

To be Delivered

Sweet

Sour

Total

Royalty-in-Kind

Exchange 2000  

210.7  million bbls

367.7  million bbls

  578.4  million bbls

17.8  million bbls

15   million bbls

Note: Royalty-In-Kind deliveries are currently scheduled to extend through April, 2003. Exchange 2000 deliveries are currently scheduled to extend through January, 2003.

Delivery Schedule as of:
July 30, 2002

Year Month Scheduled(MB)
2002 Jul 3329
2002 Aug 2987
2002 Sep 5160
2002 Oct 3106
2002 Nov 3069
2002 Dec 2421
2003 Jan 6873
2003 Feb 2500
2003 Mar 2500
2003 Apr 2250

Last updated 7/30/2002

Strategic Petroleum Reserve - Quick Facts

The Strategic Petroleum Reserve is a U.S. Government complex of four sites created in deep underground salt caverns along the Texas and Louisiana Gulf Coast that hold emergency supplies of crude oil.

Inventory

Drawdown Capability

Past Sales

Past Exchanges

Financial


8 posted on 08/02/2002 7:48:15 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
This discussion just reminded me, I discovered y-day that the Chinese own 1/3 of Canadian oil thru a subsidary of Hutchison-Whampoa.

It can be found here:
http://www.hutchison-whampoa.com/eng/energy4.htm
9 posted on 08/02/2002 8:11:54 PM PDT by Lokibob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Wasn't SPR oil used to keep gas prices down just before the 2000 election, remember?
10 posted on 08/02/2002 8:14:54 PM PDT by 11x62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport
How about these inconsistencies?

"...the president ordered the reserve to be filled to its 700 million barrel capacity.

Of course, this was followed shortly by:

...which could be easily compensated for by drawing down the US reserve, which can supply over four million barrels a day for three months.

So, this journalist is guilty of lazy reporting (aren't they all?)

If it can hold 700 million barrels, and yet depleting the reserve takes only the extraction of 90(days)*4mm = 360mm barrel, then where did the other 340mm barrels go? That isn't a simple mistake.

11 posted on 08/02/2002 10:02:16 PM PDT by ImaGraftedBranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mlocher
too bad anwar aint open.

I think that's one of the things W is going for in this election. He wants a GOP Senate so he can get Constructionist judges and Anwar.
If he can't get that in 2002, he will try again in 2004. But the SPR can get us through until 2004.

12 posted on 08/02/2002 10:03:57 PM PDT by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam
As an insider in the industry, I can tell you all "official" information is phony.

Mystery wrapped in enigma compared to what really happens.

I'm old now but even when I was a child oil from Russia came here{just an example of the many untruths of "official" information}.

13 posted on 08/02/2002 10:05:58 PM PDT by norraad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlocher
wasn't it clinton who depleted the spr in the late 1990s? i seem to recall he had some difficulty taking the political heat when gasoline jumped from about 79 cents a gallon to about 1.02 a gallon.

I recall something about VP Gore arranging for the sale of the Pacific Naval Oil Reserves that were "no longer necessary" as part of his "reinventing Government" initiative/scheme. I believe it was sold to associates of his mentor Armand Hammer, at considerably BELOW market value. Of course the media, which promptly reported any possible connection between Bush/Cheney and the oil industry, seemed to overlook this event. Tsk tsk.

14 posted on 08/02/2002 10:43:00 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: norraad
"Mystery wrapped in enigma compared to what really happens."

Didn't Winston Churchhill say that too?

15 posted on 08/03/2002 2:00:48 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
"I recall something about VP Gore arranging for the sale of the Pacific Naval Oil Reserves that were "no longer necessary" as part of his "reinventing Government" initiative/scheme."

Yup. I remember that. They sold off a lot of reserves. They sold off a huge pile of bauxite(sp) down here that had been acquired and stored in the late 40's, early 50's. They hauled the last truck load out about a month ago. (It was a mountain)

16 posted on 08/03/2002 2:06:12 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
thanks. i knew i did not have it quite right.
17 posted on 08/03/2002 5:00:20 AM PDT by mlocher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
Actually, Oxy paid far more than any other company would have for the Naval Reserve fields. It was a sealed bid sale, and I was involved in the bid submitted by the company I worked for at the time.

When Oxy won by bidding as much as it did, we all laughed at them. They paid far too much.

18 posted on 08/03/2002 6:10:40 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blam
The Gulf war cost about $80bn in today's dollars but 80% of that was paid for by US allies. This time, no one else is going to foot the bill.

There's another possibility: Occupying Iraq would allow for selling their oil to reimburse us for war costs - past and "present." Let's be creative here.

19 posted on 08/03/2002 6:31:35 AM PDT by toddst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Sounds like a reasonable thing to do.
20 posted on 08/04/2002 9:21:15 AM PDT by mafree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson