Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ml/nj
I agree with you....I will hold my tongue about Quayle...I did not think his was extremely bright, but not to the degree that the Dems demozied him, so I will cease and desist. (I think Bush Sr. was cynical in choosing him as a running mate because of his youth and looks...it wasn't quite fair to him either, he wasn't ready for that quick catapult into comparisons with Jack Kennedy.)
888 posted on 08/05/2002 4:01:49 PM PDT by Vinomori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 885 | View Replies ]


To: Vinomori
it wasn't quite fair to him either, he wasn't ready for that quick catapult into comparisons with Jack Kennedy.

You mean he wasn't a master of the sharp one-liner. You can be sure that Benston was coached by some form-over-substance Carville type. My opinion is that Quayle was the sharpest of the four running in '88. Even today there aren't many people on the political scene that I would rate ahead of him in intelligence. (Bill Bennett is one.) Quayle's comments about the Murphy Brown thing may have been ridiculed at the time by the demagogues. He never backed down and now nearly everyone agrees with him now. Pick another politician who could start, and start on the "wrong" side of national debate, and prevail. I cannot remember any other since Reagan.

ML/NJ ML/NJ

891 posted on 08/05/2002 4:16:34 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 888 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson