Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What the Senator [Torricelli] Did Not Say
The New York Times ^ | July 31, 2002 | Editorial

Posted on 07/31/2002 9:08:07 PM PDT by Torie

What the Senator Did Not Say

For violating ethics rules, Senator Robert Torricelli of New Jersey faced the music this week but proved he doesn't really know the tune. Even as he said he agreed with the findings of the Senate Ethics Committee, he continued to deny that he had done anything wrong.

The committee report stopped short of saying specifically that Mr. Torricelli had accepted valuable gifts from David Chang, a New Jersey businessman who is now serving an 18-month prison term for making illegal contributions to the Torricelli Senate campaign in 1996. But the report made it clear there was considerable largess floating around. Mr. Torricelli's sister and his former girlfriend got expensive jewelry, his office was outfitted with expensive artwork and the senator himself got a big-screen television and stereo, although he later reimbursed Mr. Chang for the wholesale price. The committee ignored claims that Mr. Torricelli had received money and expensive clothing, saying the evidence was conflicting.

The committee report, while muted, was still a stunning rebuke, delivered only a few months before fall elections in which control of the Senate may hinge on whether Mr. Torricelli can win re-election. If he wants to put the Chang episode behind him, the first thing he should do is hold a press conference in which he answers any and all questions about his behavior. The voters have a right to know, for instance, why Mr. Torricelli brought Mr. Chang along to a meeting with the South Korean prime minister, and to hear him answer charges by a former American ambassador that Mr. Torricelli embarrassed the embassy by lobbying hard for Mr. Chang's business interests.

Mr. Torricelli should also stop fighting the disclosure of a letter from federal prosecutors that summarizes their findings after a four-year investigation. That letter, given to the Senate after prosecutors decided not to seek an indictment of the senator, is under seal in federal court. Several news organizations, including The New York Times, are seeking its release. The senator argues that releasing it would violate his privacy.

Voters will have to judge not only how serious Mr. Torricelli's misbehavior was, but whether he will steer clear of these conflicts in the future. History suggests that when it comes to ethics, the senator has trouble navigating learning curves, and his speech to the Senate was not heartening. Essentially, Mr. Torricelli delivered a mea culpa without the mea. He accepted the committee's judgment that he had violated the Senate rules, then reminded his colleagues that "it has always been my contention that I believe that at no time did I accept any gifts or violate any Senate rules." He left it to his audience to figure out whether that meant the committee was wrong, the contention was wrong or the senator's unwavering belief in his own innocence was wrong. But there is something wrong somewhere, and so far Mr. Torricelli has done nothing to identify exactly what it is.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS:
So the question before the house is can Torricelli get away with not releasing the letter of the federal prosecutors without the mainstream media continuing to pound him, and without going into free fall in the polls?
1 posted on 07/31/2002 9:08:07 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Torie
What he didn't say was, I did it.
2 posted on 07/31/2002 9:15:33 PM PDT by Darlin'
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
What he didn't say, he hasn't been saying for quite a while.

www.torricelliduck.com

3 posted on 07/31/2002 9:24:19 PM PDT by martin_fierro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie

The mainstream media has already forgotten this episode. They're already gearing up for another slam against President Bush, Attorney General John Ashcroft, or any Conservative Republican - like Sen. McCain -

N O T ! ! !


4 posted on 07/31/2002 9:27:45 PM PDT by webber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Your favorite newspaper is of the opinion that The Torch may we found a bit wanting.
5 posted on 07/31/2002 9:29:04 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Essentially, Mr. Torricelli delivered a mea culpa without the mea

That's the essence of Clintonism, isn't it? The Demo/Commies have perfected that one, haven't they?

6 posted on 07/31/2002 9:35:14 PM PDT by The Electrician
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Electrician
"That's the essence of Clintonism, isn't it?"

How many times have we heard Clinton and the Democrats say "Ah accept full responsibility"?

And how many times have they avoided the consequences that come with "full responsibility"....???

7 posted on 07/31/2002 9:59:07 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Electrician
My bottom line is not one individual but all of the Senate & how they protect their fiefdom. I think this has me think'in about never going to the ballot box again. They all are co-conspirators. No opposition to his escape. Just business as usual in the "Two-Party Cartel". Voting for these bums only gives them credibility. Suppose we had an election & nobody showed up. Why vote - They do whatever they want & believe me, you are not in their plans.
8 posted on 07/31/2002 10:07:14 PM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: okie01
"David Chang, a New Jersey businessman who is now serving an 18-month prison term for making illegal contributions to the Torricelli Senate campaign in 1996."

If I was David Chang - I'd be heading to the nearest phone to call my lawyer for being in jail illegally!!!

If there was nothing wrong - he should not be in jail!!

9 posted on 07/31/2002 10:07:42 PM PDT by LADY J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: okie01
better stated...name one time any dem said i accept and actually do it
10 posted on 07/31/2002 10:10:08 PM PDT by cactusSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cactusSharp
Talk radio has to keep this thing alive. Tiny Tom said today that the committee said the Tourch [is that Italian for crook? ] was innocent. Rush and the boys and girls should have fun with this all the way to Nov.
11 posted on 07/31/2002 10:22:45 PM PDT by bybybill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cactusSharp
Rat Senaters running for re-election need to be grilled on this
12 posted on 07/31/2002 10:25:12 PM PDT by bybybill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Torie
And what the NYT's didn't say is that he couldn't be tried and convicted in the Senate because if he were expelled, the RATS would lose control of the Senate.
Therefore, he skates.
13 posted on 07/31/2002 10:26:20 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webber
Interestingly, your friend Mr. McCain was publicly calling on the Torch to release all records pertaining to this abuse of power.
14 posted on 08/01/2002 4:57:41 AM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Torie
That letter, given to the Senate after prosecutors decided not to seek an indictment of the senator, is under seal in federal court. Several news organizations, including The New York Times, are seeking its release. The senator argues that releasing it would violate his privacy.

Funny there's no 'leak' when it comes to a corrupt Democrat!! If he had been a Republican, this letter would wind up 'seeing the light of day'!

15 posted on 08/01/2002 5:37:41 AM PDT by Uff Da
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop
If severely admonishing a Senator for corrupt practices is sufficient for those running our government, why isn't severely admonishing Enron, WorldCom or Qwest not sufficient?
16 posted on 08/01/2002 6:24:19 AM PDT by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Torie
This letter should come out. "Privacy" problems? Redact it a la a FOIA response. That will only raise more questions and keep the story alive. Hehehehe....
17 posted on 08/01/2002 7:20:06 AM PDT by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
And what the NYT's didn't say is that he couldn't be tried and convicted in the Senate because if he were expelled, the RATS would lose control of the Senate. Therefore, he skates.

Actually, if Mr. Torricelli was expelled, the Democrats would not lose control of the Senate. Governor McGreevey (D-NJ) would just appoint another democrat to fill his seat.

This wasn't true about a year ago, when New Jersey had a "Republican" Acting Governor, but it's true now.

18 posted on 08/01/2002 8:34:24 AM PDT by clikker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Torie
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/750856/posts

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/9/17/162056.shtml

19 posted on 09/29/2002 7:56:30 PM PDT by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

WIPE THE SMILE OFF OF THIS MAN'S FACE.

VOTE THE RATS OUT!!

DONATE TONIGHT.
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

20 posted on 09/29/2002 7:57:41 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson