To: justshe
Oh well then, I'm sure you haven't heard of the 9th Circuit Court. Thanks anyway.
To: DoughtyOne
Doughty, Doughty, Doughty..........sigh.
YOU wrote:
Do you by any chance live in California? If you did you would know that these courts out here are iffy at best. You may have heard of the OJ Trial. If so I'm sure it will give you food for thought. Nothing is taken for granted out here like it is back east.
PLEASE read what I wrote:
The 'procedures' are the same in all federal courts.
I did not respond to what I thought was your condescending tone: "You may have heard of the OJ Trial." and your "food for thought" advice.... because I might have misread your intent.
But I DID point out your error re: the OJ Trial---and that was a trial NOT held in a FEDERAL COURT.
But having said that..read my post again.
NOTE the word PROCEDURES. I didn't say anything about decisions, as with the 9th Circuit Court. I said PROCEDURES being common across Federal courts. Or at least having more commonality than you find in state courts that can vary from state to state.
Got it?
67 posted on
07/30/2002 4:17:31 PM PDT by
justshe
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson