Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
1) the horde of attornies [sic] from all over the nation that swarmed the state. Did they have standing?
Uhm, there may have been a hoard of attorneys swarming the state, but they didn't all show up in the court pretending that they had some relevancy and should be heard. And, as a matter of fact, Larry is the only lawyer that I recall who asked to speak and was told "no" because he had no standing.
2) Who Larry was there to speak for (Bush or Gore) is not the issue. The issue is that Larry had no part in the proceedings, and he should have known it. He's supposed to be a lawyer, after all.
3) And I think you refuse to see that those of who are not Klaybots think that Larry has had plenty of time and more than enough of other people's money to prove that he could make a difference-- in ANY lawsuit he has brought to date. Instead, he's claiming a big "victory" because his suit wasn't thrown out. Pathetic. And so Larry-ish.
46 posted on 07/30/2002 2:55:50 PM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Clara Lou
All you had to say was that you were perfectly willing to trash Klayman even if he was on your side. I would have understood.
52 posted on 07/30/2002 3:17:42 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson