[elbucko]

As a warrior who was disabled in the Vietnam War..

I would also say that he was a bit out of line.

I disagree. Had the father been active or reserve, you would be technically correct. Prior service, however, does not relinquish one's 1st. Amendment rights. The father had every right to express himself to the "president". Moreover, as a former soldier, the father had a duty to other soldiers facing peril in the future, to rip Clinton.

[Alberta's Child]

You are right -- I stand corrected. I should not have said that he was "out of line" in expressing his opinion, but that his criticism was unfounded.