Skip to comments.
Libertarian candidate Stanley sentenced
Rocky Mountain News ^
| 26 jul 02
| Charlie Brennan
Posted on 07/26/2002 2:01:55 PM PDT by white trash redneck
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
The judge in this case forbade Stanley's lawyer from citing the Constitution in his defense. So much for constitutional protections in Denver. Let's hope Stanley decides to devote his energy to an appeal, rather than taking votes from Wayne Allard.
To: white trash redneck
But it shouldn't affect his campaign to wrest the Senate seat from Republican U.S. Sen. Wayne Allard,...Er, actually if he was found in BED with a dead girl or a live boy, it "shouldn't affect his campaign..."
I mean, how much "affect" can one-third of one percent of the vote have?
2
posted on
07/26/2002 2:14:16 PM PDT
by
Illbay
To: white trash redneck
"I find in all your comments that there is no (acknowledgment of) responsibility on your part to avoid introduction of a gun into the community - a loaded gun - and that concerns me," Patterson said. I bet it didn't have a trigger lock either - the horror!
3
posted on
07/26/2002 2:26:49 PM PDT
by
Gil4
To: Illbay; *bang_list
I mean, how much "affect" can one-third of one percent of the vote have? Given that the anti-gun Republicans in this state are about as effective as a wet tissue in stopping the advance of Socialism, I would hope the arrest of a veteran for exercising his Constitutional rights would result in some rather "affected" people. I'm both effected and affected.
To: Illbay
But it shouldn't affect his campaign...///...how much "affect" can one-third of one percent of the vote have? Who was it that said (something like) "There's no such thing as bad publicity." This may even triple his support so he can crack the one percent barrier.
5
posted on
07/26/2002 2:31:25 PM PDT
by
Gil4
To: Illbay
In the WA election where Maria Cantwell won her seat in the US Senate in 2000, her margin over the Republican incumbent Gorton was smaller than the number of votes for the Libertarian third party candidate. While your comment is certainly correct in general, that the Libertarian vote is miniscule, it can affect races here and there.
I've got a lot of sympathy for libertarian ideas, but I think that Libertarians would be more helpful and less harmful if they would work within the Republican party, much like the socialists who worked within the DemocRAT party as opposed to running Socialist Party candidates.
To: white trash redneck
--I have to agree with you. If either the Libertarian or American Independent vote in Nevada had gone to John Ensign in the 2000 election, Harry Reid would have lost--
To: white trash redneck
Is the the whackjob that had a posting spree here recently about how "unfairly" he was being treated. The one that dared the sheriff to arrest him?
But yet, when loons like this run under that libertarian banner, the party bames the public for being too stupid to vote for them.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not bashing the libertarian principles. I don't agree with all of them, but I don't disagree with all of them either. It just seems to me that they need a better class of candidate if they are ever going to be taken seriously.
8
posted on
07/26/2002 2:46:49 PM PDT
by
Cable225
To: white trash redneck
I've got a lot of sympathy for libertarian ideas, but I think that Libertarians would be more helpful and less harmful if they would work within the Republican party, much like the socialists who worked within the DemocRAT party as opposed to running Socialist Party candidates. The primary difference between the R's and the D's right now is that the D's are overtly Socialist while the R's are covertly Socialist.
The Republicans give the Socialists the golden opportunity to claim that free market capitalism and the principals of a Constitutional Republic are failing.
To: Cable225
The one that dared the sheriff to arrest him? FYI, the arresting officier was present at Columbine. While students and teachers bled to death, he spent several hours cowering being a fire truck.
He excels at disarming peaceful, law abiding veterans.
To: white trash redneck
"I find in all your comments that there is no (acknowledgment of) responsibility on your part to avoid introduction of a gun into the community - a loaded gun - and that concerns me," Patterson said. I wonder how greater his concern would be if nearly every gun owner in CO showded up to a rally in Denver fully armed.
I couldn't imagine a more beautiful sight than hundreds of thousands of American citizens, brandishing their favorite firearm, at a rally in support of their 2nd amendment rights.
To: Cable225
It just seems to me that they need a better class of candidate if they are ever going to be taken seriouslyWell I take this guy prettty seriously. He was willing to risk a jail sentence, loss of freedom, loss of income and getting his ass kicked in prison to provide a test case for the RKBA.
He's a hell of a lot more serious than myself and 99% of the people I know.
How serious are you about your freedoms?
12
posted on
07/26/2002 4:34:34 PM PDT
by
ibbryn
To: ibbryn
bump!
To: Cable225
"But yet, when loons like this run under that libertarian banner, the party bames the public for being too stupid to vote for them".
Having read the article, I am befuddled on how you come to the conclusion that Stanley is a "loon".
I would be willing to bet more people admire him standing up for his principles, than your entire history of posts and sideline criticism.
To: ibbryn
It seems to me there is a whole Hell of a lot of point-missing going on around here. This kookaboo judge (Judge Robert L. Patterson) lectured the defendant's lawyer that he was not to mention the Bill of Rights or the Constitution during the trial and that the precedents of the Colorado Supreme Court and even the Constitution of Colorado are not applicable within the city of Denver because Denver is a home rule city.
Or maybe you are right, maybe it is more fun to wrangle about a fraction of one percent of some half-assed vote.
15
posted on
07/26/2002 4:53:05 PM PDT
by
edger
To: edger
I got the point, I think you misdirected your reply to my attention.
Perhaps someone else missed the point?
16
posted on
07/26/2002 5:02:28 PM PDT
by
ibbryn
To: Jagdgewehr
"I find in all your comments that there is no (acknowledgment of) responsibility on your part to avoid introduction of a gun into the community - a loaded gun - and that concerns me," Patterson said.What's this "introduction of a gun" bullshit? Sounds like the same mindset that wants to "get guns off the street." The defendant was not "introducing a gun into the community." He was safely exercising his right to keep and bear arms. From the judge's words, you'd think he had left a loaded gun in a public place, sort of like a lot of LEO's we've read about recently.
To: white trash redneck
I've got a lot of sympathy for libertarian ideas, but I think that Libertarians would be more helpful and less harmful if they would work within the Republican party,The GOP already has too many of 'em.
IMHO, the libertarian dopers are overly prone to stupid stunts like this, and actually generate more anti-gun backlash as a result.
I'm a 100% pro-2nd Amendment advocate, but these irresponsible pot-smokers are scarey.
To: Willie Green
I must have missed the part in the article that talked about Stanley's pot smoking.
To: white trash redneck
I must have missed the part in the article that talked about Stanley's pot smoking.I'm talking about the general platform of the libertarian party.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson