Skip to comments.
Boeing's futuristic aircraft
- "Batwings and dragonflies"
Economist ^
| 07/25/2002
| Staff
Posted on 07/26/2002 9:16:16 AM PDT by lds23
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
A closer alliance between defense and market-driven technologies can only be helpful.
1
posted on
07/26/2002 9:16:16 AM PDT
by
lds23
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: ConstitutionMan
I really didn't have any insightful comment on the article, but I felt I had to post something. It was really just meant to be one of those light reading pieces for a summer Friday.
3
posted on
07/26/2002 9:59:58 AM PDT
by
lds23
To: lds23
Possible "Dumb Question Of The Day"...
Would a big cargo plane with "mag-lev" inside walls suspending special, magnetized containers (therefore floating everything) weigh any more than just an empty plane?
Think about it: A plane suspending a full load of cargo in the inside of the cabin (I'm someone with NO physics background, BTW)would weigh just a little more than an empty one! right?
Please, someone, set me straight!
To: Captainpaintball
Are you baiting people in order to start a long, useless thread, or are you from a state where there's medicinal marijuana?
5
posted on
07/26/2002 10:13:38 AM PDT
by
biggerten
To: Physicist
question in here for you...bwhwhahahaha.
To: Captainpaintball
It would weigh the same -- equal and opposite reactions. The weight of the cargo would push down on the magnetic field and the thing generating the magnetic field with the same amount of force as it would on the floor.
Think of the magnetic field as water, and the cargo as small boats. Even though the cargo is floating and not toughing the floor of the plane, the crago is still pushing down on the water, which is pushing down on the plane.
No such thing as a free lunch.
7
posted on
07/26/2002 10:19:53 AM PDT
by
jae471
To: Captainpaintball
No, because the 'maglev' units in the floor would still bear the weight of the cargo. All magnetic levitation is (for example, in maglev trains) is essentially a repulsive magnetic field, which produces force in the direction opposite of the repulsion.
Plus, there would probably be tremendous power requirements.
Unfortunately... with physics, as with most things, there is no free lunch.
To: jae471
No such thing as a free lunch. Get out of my brain ;-)
To: Mike-o-Matic; jae471
No such thing as a free lunch.
You both obviously worked out of the same textbook ;-)
To: biggerten
I'm flattered that you thought my dumb question was the result of chronic marijuana use! So I'll admit to smoking the dope, rather than looking like one!
To: Captainpaintball
Or, think of it this way:
What if 200 passengers had each consumed 1 pound of bad fish and in mid-flight all 200 passengers vomited their fish upward simultaneously? Would the plane weigh 200 pounds less for perhaps 1 brief horrible second?
To: lds23
Hope they have fun making new planes.... thanks to the B$ at the airport I'll never be back there.
To: Captainpaintball
Yes. It would way exactly the same (although the maglev gear would add ALOT of weight to the plane). The suspended containers would be exerting the same amount of force downward on the levitator as it exerted upwards. The advantage of mag lev is not weight reduction; it's friction. If you would like to test it, get to magnets and attempt to press them together with both of the positively charged sies facing each other. You will feel both magnets pushing away from each other at the same time. Do that vertically, and you have "magnetic levitation".
14
posted on
07/26/2002 10:27:41 AM PDT
by
Shryke
To: Mike-o-Matic; jae471
So when 'they' say "for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction..." they aren't kidding!
To: Captainpaintball
Doesn't matter, the responses are off and running.
Time for me to get my drug of choice, I'm going to the cabin and popping a cold one. Have a nice weekend.
To: macamadamia
"What if 200 passengers had each consumed 1 pound of bad fish and in mid-flight all 200 passengers vomited their fish upward simultaneously? Would the plane weigh 200 pounds less for perhaps 1 brief horrible second?" Do not neglect the downward thrust of upward-facing projectile vomit...
You're looking at a "C" in Freeper Physics here.
-Boris
17
posted on
07/26/2002 10:37:32 AM PDT
by
boris
To: lds23
Bump for a later read.(where is the bookmark button?)
18
posted on
07/26/2002 10:41:45 AM PDT
by
segis
To: macamadamia
What if 200 passengers had each consumed 1 pound of bad fish and in mid-flight all 200 passengers vomited their fish upward simultaneously? Would the plane weigh 200 pounds less for perhaps 1 brief horrible second? If you can somehow apply that scientific principle to air freight and make it work ...you are gonna be rich!!! Keep me in mind when you make it bg!!!
To: Captainpaintball
I'm someone with NO physics background It was not necessary to mention that.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson