Skip to comments.
Bomb man loses privates
THE SUN (UK) ^
| July 25, 2002
| JOHN COLES
Posted on 07/25/2002 4:24:43 PM PDT by aculeus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: aculeus
Will his attorney be representing him pro-bono?
To: aculeus
I hesitate to ask what the relative proximity of hands and testicles might have been--and why.
22
posted on
07/25/2002 4:53:48 PM PDT
by
Illbay
To: Redcloak
Well, from now on no matter how aggressive he might attempt to be, he's shootin' blanks.
23
posted on
07/25/2002 4:54:57 PM PDT
by
Illbay
To: aculeus
At least he will never have the balls to make another bomb.
To: aculeus
That'll teach him to go off half cocked...as if he now has a choice.
To: aculeus
I guess it's kinda fitting that he lost his hands too...can't whack what ya ain't got.
To: Illbay
That's what I was thinking. Maybe
he was a FOB and shorted out the bomb?
To: aculeus
Instant justice! No trial, not public expense.
To: aculeus
Poor bloke was reduced from King to Queen. Ouch!
To: aculeus
Let's give the guy a hand. He sure had balls!
30
posted on
07/25/2002 5:23:10 PM PDT
by
Drew68
To: Buffalo Head
Instant justice! No trial, not public expense. Yeah, I'd say he learned his lesson and won't be trying that again.
31
posted on
07/25/2002 5:25:05 PM PDT
by
Drew68
To: Illbay
I hesitate to ask what the relative proximity of hands and testicles might have been--and why.Sounds like he had the bomb between his legs as he put "the finishing touch" to it.
32
posted on
07/25/2002 5:25:07 PM PDT
by
csvset
To: dinasour
Einstein = One Stone (really) This guy sounds like he's now a Nein Stein.
To: aculeus
A businessman plotted to post a bomb to a rival but ended up BLOWNG HIS OWN HANDS AND TESTICLES OFF WITH IT, a court heard yesterday. Dad-of-three Jonathan Griffiths, 42, was making the bomb in a friends kitchen when it exploded IN HIS FACE, said prosecutor Gregory Bull.
Please, no one post a picture of this man's face.
To: aculeus
No matter what crime he commits, he'll never be hung. Besides, the Constitution does not guarantee a right to privates.
35
posted on
07/25/2002 5:42:43 PM PDT
by
Consort
To: aculeus
Both deny having an explosive substance with intent to endanger life and doing an act with intent to cause an explosion.Well, I guess they can deny all they want, but the circumstantial evidence certainly seems strong.
To: aculeus
"Griffiths was overheard mumbling, "Take that, Jones, you bloody bastard!! Ya see what you'd'a gotten, you crook???"
"He then issued a triumphant cackle, waving his stumps about as he did so."
To: parsifal
I think his plans kinda got out of hands. He had too many balls in the air.
s/ wincing Bill
38
posted on
07/25/2002 5:54:06 PM PDT
by
Ole Okie
To: aculeus
Griffiths: "I'll give up
anything to get even with that bastard!!"
Wildy: "You're nuts!"
Griffiths: "Well, um........gotta draw the line somewhere........."
To: Jimer
She might as well finish the job.
40
posted on
07/25/2002 5:57:54 PM PDT
by
chainsaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson