Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: longjack
Watkins IS Dusek's witness.
85 posted on 07/25/2002 9:03:57 AM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: Southflanknorthpawsis; Jaded
OK. Thanks for the info.

I couldn't remember whose witness Watkins was, and figured he was Feldman's based on the testimony he gave. That type of thinking proves the 'ME' part of the famous 'ASSUME' axiom quite nicely, thank you.

Dusek rebutted Watkin's testimony with Neal, then, as he should.

I think Neal's testimony is really damaging to his father. Feldman has to pull something out of his hat now.

longjack

196 posted on 07/25/2002 10:53:23 AM PDT by longjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson