I couldn't remember whose witness Watkins was, and figured he was Feldman's based on the testimony he gave. That type of thinking proves the 'ME' part of the famous 'ASSUME' axiom quite nicely, thank you.
Dusek rebutted Watkin's testimony with Neal, then, as he should.
I think Neal's testimony is really damaging to his father. Feldman has to pull something out of his hat now.
longjack
For what it is worth, Court TV displayed their poll, wherein 90 percent felt Neal's testimony was damaging, to his father.
After hearing about what a hotshot Feldman was/is--I haven't seen much of his supposed brilliance, yet. It could simply be he is doing the best he can, with what he has to work with.